Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmycooper
I'm Chicago, not Austria.
|
You said you were a libertarian, a capitalist and a follower of the Chicago school, so I presume you are a follower of David Friedman.
Even if you base your position purely on utilitarian/consequentialist grounds and reject the notion of natural or rational rights, you still cannot condone benefiting from acts of aggression because doing so would reject the (100%voluntary exchanges vs some involuntary exchanges) cost-benefit-analysis that David Friedman's capitalist theory essentially is.