Photos, Photography or Photographs?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Max Potential
    Confirmed User
    • Apr 2008
    • 1045

    #1

    Photos, Photography or Photographs?

    For arguments sake, if you operated a business that sells photographs of animals (you do not shoot them, you just sell them), what .com domain would you prefer and/or what would sound the best or possibly the most professional to you?

    1) AnimalPhotos .com
    2) AnimalPhotography .com
    3) AnimalPhotographs .com
  • scarlettcontent
    www.scarlettcontent.net
    • Mar 2006
    • 6031

    #2
    Photography


    Scarlett Content - Adult Content Provider - High Quality Adult Stock Content for your Websites, Mobile Media and Print.

    Over 3 Million Images (14,000 photo sets) over 5000 Videos - Many Niches, US-2257, Awesome Prices.
    Over 40 years in the adult industry.

    [email protected] Follow us on twitter.

    Comment

    • Asian Amateur
      Registered User
      • Jun 2011
      • 26

      #3
      number 1 is the best for me but it is already registered.

      Registrant:
      lachowin, curtis
      357 Fourth Street
      BROOKLYN, NY 11215-2852
      US

      Domain Name: ANIMALPHOTOS.COM
      Asian Hard Fuck
      Asian bargirl being fucked by white cock

      Comment

      • Max Potential
        Confirmed User
        • Apr 2008
        • 1045

        #4
        I am pretty sure that all 3 of those regarding animals are already registered. I was just using animal as an example. It could be tree, dog, car, porn, or pig in place of animal for that matter. Im just interested to get some thoughts on the photo portion of the domain. Thanks for your thoughts

        Comment

        • Vjo
          So Fucking Banned
          • Oct 2002
          • 6082

          #5
          The first two are both good. Photos is shorter thus, prob better. *photography sounds very professional and would also be a good two word domain altho kind of long.

          It's like *porn is great, *porno is also mildly good but *pornography is real bad.
          Last edited by Vjo; 06-09-2011, 04:01 AM.

          Comment

          • Captain Kawaii
            So Fucking Banned
            • Oct 2007
            • 6748

            #6
            none of the above...
            better ideas would be
            ???-stockpics/pix or ???stockphotos

            If you are looking to sell for commercial purposes something like that would be my choice.
            Seems like it would work better with accompanying seo to get traffic looking to BUY pictures.

            just my

            Comment

            • Max Potential
              Confirmed User
              • Apr 2008
              • 1045

              #7
              Originally posted by Captain Kawaii
              none of the above...
              better ideas would be
              ???-stockpics/pix or ???stockphotos

              If you are looking to sell for commercial purposes something like that would be my choice.
              Seems like it would work better with accompanying seo to get traffic looking to BUY pictures.

              just my
              Captain, just so I understand correctly what you are saying...you think that;

              Animal-StockPics.com, Animal-Stockpix.com or AnimalStockPhotos.com would be better and/or sound more professional than AnimalPhotos.com or AnimalPhotographs.com for a web site that was in business to sell animal photographs?

              Comment

              • justinsain
                Confirmed User
                • Feb 2005
                • 3374

                #8
                I understand you not being specific with your plans and using animals as an example so we don't know your exact intentions.

                Stock photos is usually associated with images that can be bought and used for something else like in a magazine or for advertisement. If that's your intention, using " stock " in the name gives a clear idea as to your intention.

                If you are selling prints suitable for framing and not to be used for commercial purpose, using " stock " would be misleading and confusing.

                You said you were just selling pictures that you didn't create so I would be less inclined to use " photography " as this relates more to the overall process of creating the image than just possessing a picture.

                I think shorter is better so I think animalphotos or animalpics would be better than animalphotographs or you could even use animalimages.

                Thats just my

                Comment

                • TheDA
                  Confirmed User
                  • May 2006
                  • 4665

                  #9
                  animalphotos of those 3. But maybe consider ....prints.com as well.
                  Sharleen Spiteri - 1989 - In The Ass

                  Comment

                  • Chosen
                    • Aug 2001
                    • 63151

                    #10
                    Pics

                    Comment

                    • Cherry7
                      Confirmed User
                      • Aug 2005
                      • 3564

                      #11
                      woof.com

                      My Neighbour Butterfly PORN-The Musical The Long Goodbye


                      Cinema Erotique

                      Comment

                      Working...