Ultra High Definition TV - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

2MuchMark

Mark of 2Much.net

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 50989
Share

Post
#1

Ultra High Definition TV

05-22-2011, 08:03 AM

http://www.japanprobe.com/2011/05/22...definition-tv/

This 85″ LCD display has a resolution of 7,680 x 4,320 pixels, which is equivalent to 16 times the resolution of HDTV, allowing for the display of incredibly detailed, high-quality images.

In the past the only way to show the Ultra High Definition broadcast at full resolution was using a projector, but due to Sharp?s UV2A LCD technology, which allows for an unprecedented level of precision when controlling the alignment of liquid crystal molecules in an LCD structure, Sharp have been able to create a flawless 33megapixel display.
Tags: None
bronco67

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Dec 2006

Posts: 29032
Share

Post
#2

05-22-2011, 08:21 AM

Isn't anything above 2k just diminishing returns where visual perception is concerned? Looks like it would be overkill.
Comment
GatorB

The Demon & 12clicks

Join Date: Oct 2001

Posts: 18208
Share

Post
#3

05-22-2011, 08:38 AM

That will never be mainsteam.
Comment
Internet User

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: May 2011

Posts: 544
Share

Post
#4

05-22-2011, 09:02 AM

Originally posted by GatorB

That will never be mainsteam.

3-4 years tops
Comment
ArsewithClass

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Mar 2007

Posts: 7957
Share

Post
#5

05-22-2011, 09:40 AM

That picture is incredible! It looks like a window through to real life... I think its fantastic, but I wouldnt like to purchase the camera to film true 7000*5000

Nice bit of equipment
Comment
camperjohn64

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 1531
Share

Post
#6

05-22-2011, 09:41 AM

Originally posted by bronco67

Isn't anything above 2k just diminishing returns where visual perception is concerned? Looks like it would be overkill.

I was thinking the same thing. If you compress images (JPG vs RAW) you lose quality. At some point the video compression will cancel out the quality of pixel display.

Prediction: 25 years from now, compression will be almost lossless (99.8% RAW), and pixels in displays will be imperceptible to the human eye (26,000x16000 pixels). It's just a matter of time.

www.gimmiegirlproductions.com
Comment
Si

Such Fun!

Join Date: Feb 2008

Posts: 13900
Share

Post
#7

05-22-2011, 09:45 AM

Sharp is doing some very good and interesting things lately, I'm still an LG man though.
Comment
scarlettcontent

www.scarlettcontent.net

Join Date: Mar 2006

Posts: 6031
Share

Post
#8

05-22-2011, 10:15 AM

nice bit of kit

Scarlett Content - Adult Content Provider - High Quality Adult Stock Content for your Websites, Mobile Media and Print.

Over 3 Million Images (14,000 photo sets) over 5000 Videos - Many Niches, US-2257, Awesome Prices.
Over 40 years in the adult industry.

[email protected] Follow us on twitter.
Comment
Jack Sparrow

Almost goners..

Join Date: May 2008

Posts: 11420
Share

Post
#9

05-22-2011, 10:44 AM

What resolutiin is real life anyway?
Comment
Scott McD

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 67798
Share

Post
#10

05-22-2011, 11:02 AM

Anything is better than 3D shit!

I Buy My High Quality Traffic Here, You Should Too!
Comment
ArsewithClass

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Mar 2007

Posts: 7957
Share

Post
#11

05-22-2011, 12:59 PM

Originally posted by Scott McD

Anything is better than 3D shit!

I was going to purchase a 3d camera to check out the material when watching it.. do you think it wont take off?
Comment
biskoppen

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 5809
Share

Post
#12

05-22-2011, 01:00 PM

Originally posted by GatorB

That will never be mainsteam.

Ofcourse it will

Submit my videos to make bank, tons of 5 minute videos offered right here
Comment
SDA CASH - Banned for Life AGAIN

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Mar 2011

Posts: 1100
Share

Post
#13

05-22-2011, 01:27 PM

I must get one asap!
Comment
GatorB

The Demon & 12clicks

Join Date: Oct 2001

Posts: 18208
Share

Post
#14

05-22-2011, 03:55 PM

Originally posted by Internet User

3-4 years tops

Nope. No ultra HD content. Networks and cable channels have spent tens of millions upgrading to HD. They're not going to spend millions more in just a few years to upgrade to ultra HD. Not to mention broadcast network can't even handle 1080p so they certainly can't handle ultra HD. Cable and satellite companies have limited bandwidth so unless they only want to offer 1/8 the channels they have now they can't do ultra HD either. No ultra HD online steaming either. Most people don't have connections fast enough to handle it and won't for the foreseeable future. At least not in the US. Even if they did, bandwidth caps that ISPs are now enforcing will make ultra HD useless. All those companies that spent BILLIONS developing blu-ray are not in a hurry to go to ultra HD format. They are still trying to make money on blu-ray. So if there is no content then no one will buy these things.
Comment
Seth Manson

Please dont fuck animals

Join Date: Jul 2010

Posts: 3988
Share

Post
#15

05-22-2011, 03:57 PM

I'm pretty damn happy with regular HD now that most networks and channels have finaly upgraded to it and prices have dropped to be affordable to most people.
Comment
bronco67

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Dec 2006

Posts: 29032
Share

Post
#16

05-22-2011, 04:03 PM

Originally posted by GatorB

Nope. No ultra HD content. Networks and cable channels have spent tens of millions upgrading to HD. They're not going to spend millions more in just a few years to upgrade to ultra HD. Not to mention broadcast network can't even handle 1080p so they certainly can't handle ultra HD. Cable and satellite companies have limited bandwidth so unless they only want to offer 1/8 the channels they have now they can't do ultra HD either. No ultra HD online steaming either. Most people don't have connections fast enough to handle it and won't for the foreseeable future. At least not in the US. Even if they did, bandwidth caps that ISPs are now enforcing will make ultra HD useless. All those companies that spent BILLIONS developing blu-ray are not in a hurry to go to ultra HD format. They are still trying to make money on blu-ray. So if there is no content then no one will buy these things.

Also, look at the production end of UltraHD. It's already a pain in the ass to post-produce effects and edit for 1080p. Just imagine going 8 times bigger. The amount of hard drive space and computing power needed would be incredible.

As a digital animator, I'm still just getting into rendering in HD, which takes up so much more time. Now 3D is getting popular, which means rendering double frames(one for each eye) -- and they eventually want to spring this UltraHD shit, which will be crazy to render and display during After Effects processing.

We're just moving way too fast.

Last edited by bronco67; 05-22-2011, 04:04 PM.
Comment
Socks

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2002

Posts: 8475
Share

Post
#17

05-22-2011, 04:05 PM

We'll be going back to pluggable VCR sized tapes called "hard drives"
Comment
GatorB

The Demon & 12clicks

Join Date: Oct 2001

Posts: 18208
Share

Post
#18

05-22-2011, 04:20 PM

Originally posted by bronco67

Also, look at the production end of UltraHD. It's already a pain in the ass to post-produce effects and edit for 1080p. Just imagine going 8 times bigger. The amount of hard drive space and computing power needed would be incredible.

As a digital animator, I'm still just getting into rendering in HD, which takes up so much more time. Now 3D is getting popular, which means rendering double frames(one for each eye) -- and they eventually want to spring this UltraHD shit, which will be crazy to render and display during After Effects processing.

We're just moving way too fast.

3-D is a fad and will be done in 5 years. Sales of 3-D TVs are a joke. What all these posters saying it's inevitable don't get is there is only so much bandwidth. Boprcaster use 6 MHZ wide channels and have amax bitrate of 19 MBps. Which is barely suitable for 1080i. Espeically since broadcasters still use mpeg2 compression. Now if they switch to mpeg4( which no broadcasters I know have any desire to do ) you can do 1080p. But that's it. No way you could do 2k let alone 4k. DirecTv uses Mpeg4 they barely have enough bandwidth for what they currently have. Now way you're getting 4k TVs. In 2025 TVs will still be 1080p.
Comment
Cherry7

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2005

Posts: 3564
Share

Post
#19

05-23-2011, 02:08 PM

Porn site will be claiming their videos are in Ultra HD in a matter of months...

My Neighbour Butterfly PORN-The Musical The Long Goodbye

Cinema Erotique
Comment
96ukssob

So Fucking Banananananas

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 12991
Share

Post
#20

05-23-2011, 02:17 PM

would be useless for years until TV and movie industry buys cameras that support it

Email: Clicky on Me
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...