Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
I don't know what to think of it, the concept is beyond me. My interest in science includes astrophysics, quantum mechanics etc but I am having trouble wrapping my head around their disagreement.
|
The disagreement is based on Hawkings Belief that once something passes an Event Horizon of a Blackhole it can not be recovered.
The author of the book says it's not true because physics does not account for anything lost. The author of the book also say's that once things go into the Event Horizon it has reached zero time but is not lost and there can be recovered.
Somethings:
Light has mass which is why it bends near Black Holes. It is responsive to gravity.
I am inclined to believe that once mass passes the Event Horizon of a Black hole mass simply behaves differently but still constrained to the rules of Time. Author of the book believes that mass reaches zero time.
Which does not make sense unless of course Black Holes are what makes the universe stable from the outset and a large part of what draws the universe back into a singular point in time. If thats the case then Hawking Theory of a Big Bang is true.
If all the mass in our dimension all comes together eventually at a single point and time which is zero then thats where string theory comes from. Where essentially String Theory says our Dimension/Universe is a pocket of something larger where other dimensions like ours break into existence and out of existence. Which means our existence is repetitive and not unique. Thats right we all been here before.
In short string theory also says that basically our current place in time within our Universe is the perfect time for us to exist because at most all other points in time of this dimension it inhospitable since most other points in time of our dimension are subject to different laws of atomic behavior.