Quote:
Originally Posted by helterskelter808
The fact that most cam models have always come from poorer countries of the world should indicate that being publicly visible on a live sex site to the world (no idea what you mean by 'NOT BEING MASS DISTRIBUTED'), and worse, maybe people at home, is not only not the greatest ambition for most girls but it's also not as lucrative as the top handful of performers, or theoretical earnings, might indicate.
But if you think it's such an easy job, and so easy to make $200 an hour, what's stopping you trying?  |
I never said that it was easy. I said that it was a whole damned hell of a lot easier than setting up a whole cam studio and/or network. They don't have to worry about fuck all. Expenses, traffic, legal issues, processing, carders, etc etc etc.
They're not mass distributed in the sense that they're going to be in pictures/videos that will be downloaded millions of times or plastered all over the internet on thousands of sites. Yes, their little preview things could be recorded, and some cam sites sell video/pics but this is not the norm.
When some lady does a regular porn shoot she'll be downloaded and traded and shared now till eternity and makes the $200-$1000 ONCE. On a cam site she makes that with, what, 1% the exposure? .0000001% the permanent exposure?