WTF is the deal with 15-17 year old non-nude solo girls?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • donkevlar
    Confirmed User
    • Sep 2006
    • 4325

    #1

    WTF is the deal with 15-17 year old non-nude solo girls?

    I didn't think this would be legal, let alone accepted considering people's stance on girls who LOOK young having sites.

    Running a non nude site with a 15 year old girl getting her prepared for porn in the future is a bit sleazeballish to say the least, no?

    Or am I on crack and this does not exist?

    EHHH?
    [email protected]
  • Nicky
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Mar 2003
    • 30071

    #2
    I bet it will convert great when she turns 18 and starts doing porn and already has a members base but as you say it is kinda sleazy....

    gfynicky @ gmail.com

    Comment

    • DBS.US
      Geo Cities
      • Aug 2003
      • 11842

      #3
      To even think it is sleazeballish
      Have an unused domain? Make a Free Chaturbate White Label site and be making money tonight

      Comment

      • Casa Nova
        Confirmed User
        • Mar 2007
        • 2867

        #4
        yeh its not right at all.

        ICQ: 405 009 573


        Comment

        • LiveDose
          Show Yer Tits!
          • Feb 2002
          • 25792

          #5
          Gotta ask the parents.

          Scammer Alert: acer19 acer [email protected] [email protected] Money stolen using PayPal

          Comment

          • bigalownz
            Confirmed User
            • Aug 2005
            • 1657

            #6
            Originally posted by Nicky
            I bet it will convert great when she turns 18 and starts doing porn and already has a members base but as you say it is kinda sleazy....

            your right i seen alot of non nude girls turn to hardcore porn
            $100 free credit for all hosting needs

            Comment

            • donkevlar
              Confirmed User
              • Sep 2006
              • 4325

              #7
              Originally posted by DBS.US
              To even think it is sleazeballish
              Yea, I saw a thread today with 'so and so's had her site since she was 15 now shes legal and doing hardcore'.

              I never knew this existed.
              [email protected]

              Comment

              • Hawkeye
                Confirmed User
                • Feb 2002
                • 1291

                #8
                I see no problem with it.

                The Sears catalog that comes in the paper every Sunday has little girls posing in their underwear.

                Comment

                • Dirty F
                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                  • Jul 2001
                  • 59204

                  #9
                  Originally posted by donkevlar
                  I didn't think this would be legal, let alone accepted considering people's stance on girls who LOOK young having sites.

                  Running a non nude site with a 15 year old girl getting her prepared for porn in the future is a bit sleazeballish to say the least, no?

                  Or am I on crack and this does not exist?

                  EHHH?
                  Why would it not be legal for a 15 year old girl to have a site?

                  Comment

                  • Ayla_SquareTurtle
                    Confirmed User
                    • Sep 2005
                    • 3550

                    #10
                    Originally posted by donkevlar
                    Yea, I saw a thread today with 'so and so's had her site since she was 15 now shes legal and doing hardcore'.

                    I never knew this existed.
                    I saw that too and knew someone would bring it up eventually. I remember seeing a few sites like this when I first started being aware of porn on the net. Didn't think anyone was still doing it though.
                    gone. long gone.

                    aylasquareturtle .."a"t".. gmail dawt com

                    Comment

                    • Shoehorn!
                      Die With Your Boots On
                      • Oct 2003
                      • 22872

                      #11
                      I clicked this thread and had no idea what it was referring to, then closed it and read the thread that turned out to be what you are talking about.

                      Comment

                      • donkevlar
                        Confirmed User
                        • Sep 2006
                        • 4325

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Dirty Franck
                        Why would it not be legal for a 15 year old girl to have a site?
                        I don't know, it just seems like it would be illegal.

                        Old men taking any sort of sexual photos of 15 year olds, even though they're clothed, with plans to get them naked as soon as the law permits SEEMS like something America would arrest people for, no?
                        [email protected]

                        Comment

                        • Legendary Samir - BANNED FOR LIFE
                          So Fucking Banned
                          • Jun 2007
                          • 1442

                          #13
                          Is it OK with billing providers?

                          Comment

                          • Vick!
                            Confirmed User
                            • Nov 2005
                            • 6882

                            #14
                            Just like 'Free Speech' shit .. anyone should be able to have whatever type of site he/she wants

                            PS: at whatever age...
                            Last edited by Vick!; 06-25-2007, 06:12 PM.
                            Affordable Quality Web Hosting

                            Comment

                            • thonglife
                              So Fucking Banned
                              • Oct 2004
                              • 1566

                              #15
                              Reanna Mae had a NN "modeling" site before going hardcore. I think Real Peachez started young as well.

                              Comment

                              • Phil LoadedCash
                                LoadedCash AM
                                • Jan 2007
                                • 462

                                #16
                                Originally posted by Legendary Samir
                                Is it OK with billing providers?
                                Well it's not Adult.. so PayPal would cover it.

                                Comment

                                • MetaMan
                                  I AM WEB 2.0
                                  • Jan 2003
                                  • 28682

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Hawkeye
                                  I see no problem with it.

                                  The Sears catalog that comes in the paper every Sunday has little girls posing in their underwear.
                                  Sears is selling clothes are these sites not soley selling suggestive sexual content?

                                  Comment

                                  • starpimps
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Sep 2006
                                    • 6954

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by x Shady x
                                    Well it's not Adult.. so PayPal would cover it.
                                    you are joking right..
                                    Teen Porn Models / Solo Girls

                                    Comment

                                    • nation-x
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Mar 2004
                                      • 5370

                                      #19
                                      and miss teen usa doesn't get huge popularity because of the bathing suits... RIIIgghhhtttt... the majority of you you motherfuckers that say you don't look at those girls are the biggest pervs in private...

                                      I don't promote any girls like this on any of the sites I run... it's a personal choice... but I do know that my grandmother was 16 when she married my grandfather and they were married for over 60 years before they passed.

                                      There are LOTS LOTS LOTS of major programs around that have teen sites with models dressed like young teens and made up to look that way... and you don't bitch about that... much.

                                      I promote MET Art and I find their content to be erotic but stylish... natural... I don't see anything wrong with that... I dislike gagging... (biohazard bitches or whatever) and extreme bdsm... (art is fine)...

                                      Comment

                                      • stev0
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Aug 2003
                                        • 6801

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Hawkeye
                                        I see no problem with it.

                                        The Sears catalog that comes in the paper every Sunday has little girls posing in their underwear.
                                        Are you kidding? If you don't see the difference here I'm a little worried.

                                        Comment

                                        • Fap
                                          Just Du It
                                          • Feb 2004
                                          • 12094

                                          #21
                                          I dont know any sites you are talking about.. unless you mean myspace..

                                          Comment

                                          • Tempest
                                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                                            • May 2004
                                            • 10217

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by Hawkeye
                                            I see no problem with it.

                                            The Sears catalog that comes in the paper every Sunday has little girls posing in their underwear.
                                            Not to mention the entire fashion industry that chews up and spits out young girls.

                                            Comment

                                            • thonglife
                                              So Fucking Banned
                                              • Oct 2004
                                              • 1566

                                              #23
                                              I promote MET Art and I find their content to be erotic but stylish... natural... I don't see anything wrong with that... I dislike gagging... (biohazard bitches or whatever) and extreme bdsm... (art is fine)...
                                              Funny... I hear that Galitsin's stuff was art too.. and we all know what became of that.

                                              Comment

                                              • JP513
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • Feb 2007
                                                • 1914

                                                #24
                                                If it's non-nude . . . it's legal.

                                                Having said that, if the minor is not emancipated, how much of this sexually suggestive posing (and income earning) is allowed for a minor, without parental approval? If parental approval is required (and I dont know the law on this one), then u gotta wonder about the parents who approve porn training wheels for their daughters.

                                                Then again, some of these girls are daughters of former strippers and whores and might be fully supportive.
                                                I don't always drink beer, but when I do, I wish I was drinking wine instead.

                                                Comment

                                                • After Shock Media
                                                  It's coming look busy
                                                  • Mar 2001
                                                  • 35299

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by JP513
                                                  If it's non-nude . . . it's legal.

                                                  Having said that, if the minor is not emancipated, how much of this sexually suggestive posing (and income earning) is allowed for a minor, without parental approval? If parental approval is required (and I dont know the law on this one), then u gotta wonder about the parents who approve porn training wheels for their daughters.

                                                  Then again, some of these girls are daughters of former strippers and whores and might be fully supportive.
                                                  Minors who are not emancipated can not enter into any contract, well they can but they can back out at any time and render it useless and even keep any and all money earned and so forth. So yes parental permission is typically gotten.

                                                  Though I find them disgusting, I am just one of those that do not think we need more laws.

                                                  [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                                                  Comment

                                                  • CaptainHowdy
                                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                    • Dec 2004
                                                    • 94125

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by x Shady x
                                                    Well it's not Adult.. so PayPal would cover it.
                                                    ! This comment goes well with your nick! Cute!

                                                    Comment

                                                    • Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life
                                                      (felis madjewicus)
                                                      • Jul 2006
                                                      • 20368

                                                      #27
                                                      there's non-nude sites grooming girls far younger than 15 for this type of lifestyle, what kind of parent allows that???? the fact that a 15 yer old girl (or younger for that matter) has a website in which people need a credit card (this is an all 18+ crowd for the most part) to view her suggestive photos IS CREEPY...

                                                      I'm not gonna front like i didn't want in on sarah peachez site when she was 16 though, but hell I was 16 back then too so i don't feel that creepy myself, lol....

                                                      Comment

                                                      • Pornwolf
                                                        Drunk and Unruly
                                                        • Jan 2002
                                                        • 22712

                                                        #28
                                                        It's sleazier than Skufty's owner IMHO.
                                                        I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade...

                                                        Webair, bitches.

                                                        Comment

                                                        • kane
                                                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                          • Aug 2001
                                                          • 20684

                                                          #29
                                                          I saw a story on this a while back. A 15 year old girl started a site with some guy who ran a network of these sites. He eventually got arrested for other underage things and her site was gone so she taught herself html and had her friends take pictures and ran the site herself. She did some normal modeling in different outfits but a lot of them were pretty bad. Like she would wear thongs or little panties and bras and things like that. She was never nude, but it was pretty suggestive. She had a lot of members and guys sending her gifts all the time. Her mom said she was worried about the guys stalking her daughter and her daughter basically feeding off these pedo's, but she made some serious money with the site so she let her keep it up.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • JP513
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Feb 2007
                                                            • 1914

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by After Shock Media
                                                            Minors who are not emancipated can not enter into any contract, well they can but they can back out at any time and render it useless and even keep any and all money earned and so forth. So yes parental permission is typically gotten.

                                                            Though I find them disgusting, I am just one of those that do not think we need more laws.
                                                            Good reply, thanks. Confirms my thought that parental approval is typically done in this situation.

                                                            I wouldn't get involved in anything with an under 18 feature model.
                                                            I don't always drink beer, but when I do, I wish I was drinking wine instead.

                                                            Comment

                                                            • Chris Corn
                                                              Confirmed User
                                                              • Jul 2006
                                                              • 237

                                                              #31
                                                              underage non-nude is legal if is also NON-SEXUAL...define a 'sexual' image and you should be cool with the law.
                                                              I shoot video.

                                                              Corn.Christopher (at) gmail.com
                                                              ICQ 212-072-421

                                                              Comment

                                                              • direxxx
                                                                Registered User
                                                                • Jun 2007
                                                                • 37

                                                                #32
                                                                Probably it'd be legal with parental consent and if the content wasn't overtly sexual. But whether it's legal or not, the grooming aspect of it seems pretty sick when they're so young.
                                                                Let Direxxx help you promote, and increase the value of your members area. Our current sites are :
                                                                HeadTease - Your Sex and Porn Magazine
                                                                Frisky Fiction - High Quality Erotic Fiction
                                                                Porn Writing - For All Your Porn Writing Needs

                                                                Comment

                                                                • bl4h
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • Jul 2006
                                                                  • 1282

                                                                  #33
                                                                  I'll have nothing to do with it

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • ztik
                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                    • Aug 2001
                                                                    • 5196

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by donkevlar
                                                                    I don't know, it just seems like it would be illegal.

                                                                    Old men taking any sort of sexual photos of 15 year olds, even though they're clothed, with plans to get them naked as soon as the law permits SEEMS like something America would arrest people for, no?
                                                                    Yeah, it SHOULD be illegal.
                                                                    .

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • Miguel T
                                                                      ♦ Web Developer ♦
                                                                      • May 2005
                                                                      • 12470

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Originally posted by LiveDose
                                                                      Gotta ask the parents.

                                                                      Full Stack Webdeveloper: HTML5/CSS3, jQuery, AJAX, ElevatedX, NATS, MechBunny, Wordpress

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      Working...