Quote:
Originally Posted by L-Pink
Technically that house was the most dangerous spot in the world based on it's occupant. If it wasn't for trying to make a positive identification of the body we would have smart-bombed the entire block. Period.
|
No
While the people of the USA may think its jolly great to bomb everything, outside the USA its considered not. And its important to keep good contacts with other countries.
If the place had been bombed it would have created huge dipolatic problems. The UK would have no choice to condem and presure politicaly in the UK would be to move away from USA suport.
Pakistan would go nuts and condem huge deaths.
The site of women and children being brought out dead would fume those in the east. it would create suport for the terrists.
This presedent is clearly trying to change the view of usa that bombs anything and does not care to a usa that is using its troops in a clever way.
thats why he is a good man. and a clever man. bombing the place would be easy, but the results are unaceptable outide the usa. even in the usa its not fully suported.
this is very significant change in polocy.
its why so far there has been no condemnation (that i have seen) from other country leaders.
it was not thick bully boy usa but a smart usa.