Quote:
Originally Posted by Tam
He wasn't unarmed, he threw his wife at them, real man he was to the very end, huh? 
I don't like to hear of anyone dying, and I didn't and don't celebrate his death, but I think he was a coward. A coward sneaks in and takes it's victims when no one is looking, a real man stands in their faces and beats the hell out of them. He was a coward, because he didn't even do that, he sent others to do it for him.  |
i think that was early reports.
they are saying he did not use her as a defence.
But if I was the presedent, I would have done the sdame, and ordered his death.
A trial would have gone on years and made him look weak.
Moraly it was wrong. It was murder. But he had no option. A trial would cost millions, last years, lots of legal issues and made him a mator and made the presedent look weak, plus he would be in the news each day.
This was the simplist option. Its not right to kill him, but the presedent is a usa presedent. By this he is consentraiting on the USA and had hilory to concentrate on other countries. Unlike Nikson wqho was considered very respected by country leaders but not liked at home (usa).
I think in the UK our priminister has done the same. Consetrate on the home market (UK) but have somone William Heage deal with the foregn dipolotic situation.
I suspect this operation had been incredibly planed out. Clearly they knew were he was for a while and had the whole house scanned. Probably had a satalight just on the house for months. I bet there will be nothing so well planed out ever.