|
Typical armchair quarterbacking after the fact. I love how all the usual critics of the USA jump on anything they do, "the soldiers should have done this"..."they shouldn't have shot him"..."he was unarmed" and so on.
I think the quote "Just shut up, you weren't there" applies here. I will say this though; I think it's safe to assume that in a huge raid and firefight like that one was you're raising your chances of getting shot if you resist in any way, period. If the agent/soldier in question were to admit to having him down on his knees and he executed him with a shot to the back of the head then there might be cause for concern. (major emphasis on the word "might")
Is the world better off without this scum in it? I say yes. Case closed.
|