Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix
hey man, im not trying to wish your dogs harm or anything
just when you come on here...with two rotts...and then keep on with the radioactive bit
which is passive aggressiveness..it isnt helping your case.
if monday passes and nothing comes of it, id say you are in the clear, also if the other dog owner supports your claim that it was just an accident then you are fine.
however bylaws, and a lawyer wont help you if the game warden decides to come for your dog....or even if its just the animal shelter people.
so, you know...chill
|
I'm already in the clear. Like I'm trying to explain to you, pets fall under bylaws in BC. Even if the dogs had of outright bit the dog in half, there would still be no danger of them being taken away. Game Wardens don't have jurisdiction. It falls under Animal Control, or city bylaw officers, or their agents (SPCA).
When it changes is if a person is hurt. If a person is attacked you then open yourself up for Criminal Negligence under the criminal code and the city would be able to impound the dogs and apply to the courts for an order to destroy them. No person was attacked or menaced in any way.
The reason I'm using references like Spiderman and Superman is to try and point out just how silly it sounds to be posting stupid shit like "I'd take you out then your dogs" on a message board. It's just 100% assinine. It would have no effect on the outcome other than to open a person up to be criminally charged themself. To suggest that an adult would get so angry as to physically attack someone over an accident involving pets suggests a pretty low level of intelligence. We can expect that from Simon based on his long history of utter stupidity but MOST adults would not react in that way. That's just the way it is.