The $77 Billion Fighter Jets That Have Never Gone to War

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BFT3K
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Dec 2005
    • 10764

    #1

    The $77 Billion Fighter Jets That Have Never Gone to War

    ‎$77 Billion spent in defense for no reason, but we need to urgently cut hundreds of millions from health, research, and education budgets instead. Yeah, that makes sense...

    Story here...

    http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/77-bil...ry?id=13322450
    Last edited by BFT3K; 04-08-2011, 09:20 AM.
  • spazlabz
    Confirmed User
    • Jul 2003
    • 6548

    #2
    yeah from what I understand it really is not fond of water so they don't fly it in the rain




    but it looks REALLY COOL, so we'll keep it, who wants an educated public any way LOL

    Comment

    • Vendzilla
      Biker Gnome
      • Mar 2004
      • 23200

      #3
      The F22 is a cool plane and it's not one thats needed right now, it's just too good. If you read up on the plane, it's far more advanced than we need.
      It has a BOB Black Out Button , that when pushed, makes the plane do an extreme U turn which will black out the pilot and then fly the plane level and straight till the pilot regains his wits. Just to out run a issle, of which there are no missle capable yet of catching it.

      Like it or not, it's the military budget that brings in most of the new advancements in tech we see each year, like the internet
      Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
      think about that

      Comment

      • PR_Glen
        Confirmed User
        • Oct 2006
        • 9058

        #4
        Originally posted by Vendzilla
        The F22 is a cool plane and it's not one thats needed right now, it's just too good. If you read up on the plane, it's far more advanced than we need.
        It has a BOB Black Out Button , that when pushed, makes the plane do an extreme U turn which will black out the pilot and then fly the plane level and straight till the pilot regains his wits. Just to out run a issle, of which there are no missle capable yet of catching it.

        Like it or not, it's the military budget that brings in most of the new advancements in tech we see each year, like the internet
        i agree with you but it would be nice if they made attempts to cut back a little bit and give a few extra billion for the schools and research too. Seems like every government gets gouged when it comes to military spending unfortunately.
        webmaster at pimproll dot com

        Comment

        • BFT3K
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Dec 2005
          • 10764

          #5
          Originally posted by Vendzilla
          The F22 is a cool plane and it's not one thats needed right now, it's just too good. If you read up on the plane, it's far more advanced than we need.
          It has a BOB Black Out Button , that when pushed, makes the plane do an extreme U turn which will black out the pilot and then fly the plane level and straight till the pilot regains his wits. Just to out run a issle, of which there are no missle capable yet of catching it.

          Like it or not, it's the military budget that brings in most of the new advancements in tech we see each year, like the internet
          I think we need to develop a "Black Out Button" for our current government.

          $77 Billion is TWICE the budget cut figure the asswipes in Washington are currently fighting over - for planes that will never be used.

          It's time to restart this government - with NO lobbyists and NO special interests.

          The American people really need to reclaim their country, and I don't mean through some fake, corporate controlled, Tea Bagger movement either.

          Comment

          • IllTestYourGirls
            Ah My Balls
            • Feb 2007
            • 14311

            #6
            So much waste in the military industrial complex.

            Comment

            • Coup
              🚨 PBBC International 🚨
              • Apr 2010
              • 9931

              #7
              the military is the biggest welfare queen of them all

              Comment

              • BFT3K
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Dec 2005
                • 10764

                #8
                Originally posted by IllTestYourGirls
                So much waste in the military industrial complex.

                I agree with you 100%

                Both sides are guilty of prioritizing corporate and special interests, over the real interests of the American people.

                There are plenty of assholes on both sides of our totally corrupt two party puppet government, no argument here.
                Last edited by BFT3K; 04-08-2011, 09:40 AM.

                Comment

                • IllTestYourGirls
                  Ah My Balls
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 14311

                  #9
                  Originally posted by BFT3K
                  I agree with you 100%

                  Both sides are guilty of prioritizing corporate and special interests, over the American people.

                  There are plenty of asshole Democrats too, no argument here.
                  Until we elect a non-corporatist this will never end. And even then it is doubtful that it will end for a long time.

                  Comment

                  • AliGbone
                    Confirmed User
                    • Sep 2004
                    • 547

                    #10
                    There's been enough sadness since da terrible events of 7-11.
                    I'm not Ali A, not Ali B, Ali C, Ali D, Ali E, Ali F... but... Ali G!

                    Booyakasha!!!!
                    Need Content? ADULTCENTRO ROCKS! ADULTCENTRO.COM

                    Comment

                    • dyna mo
                      just a fucking jerk
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 68184

                      #11
                      we had all better hope those f-22s aren't needed for what they do.

                      Comment

                      • Gouge
                        Confirmed User
                        • Mar 2005
                        • 1438

                        #12
                        I love the F22 and glad we have them, i wish had another 187 of them in the fleet. Seeing how our government is spending about $10 Billion per day and these planes cost $77 Billion that's just under 8 days of what we are spending up in Washington right now. In the long run these things will pay off, and with the 5th generation improvements they are worth every penny when they go into action.

                        Comment

                        • BFT3K
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Dec 2005
                          • 10764

                          #13
                          Originally posted by IllTestYourGirls
                          Until we elect a non-corporatist this will never end. And even then it is doubtful that it will end for a long time.
                          The president is only elected for 4 to 8 years.

                          Our current system of corruption is much stronger than any one single person.

                          Even if Obama (or anyone) really wants to fix the broken system going in, they are quickly told how things are really going to play out, and within weeks they are whistling a different tune.

                          The bottom line is that the "people" no longer effect or direct the government at all. If a bunch of people want to donate $25 or $50 each, towards the potential candidate of their choice, how much influence are they getting when corporations can donate $millions to get their way instead?

                          We need to restart this system...

                          Comment

                          • JFK
                            FUBAR the ORIGINATOR
                            • Jan 2002
                            • 67373

                            #14
                            Originally posted by IllTestYourGirls
                            Until we elect a non-corporatist this will never end. And even then it is doubtful that it will end for a long time.
                            it will never end

                            FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
                            For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

                            Comment

                            • IllTestYourGirls
                              Ah My Balls
                              • Feb 2007
                              • 14311

                              #15
                              Originally posted by BFT3K
                              The president is only elected for 4 to 8 years.

                              Our current system of corruption is much stronger than any one single person.

                              Even if Obama (or anyone) really wants to fix the broken system going in, they are quickly told how things are really going to play out, and within weeks they are whistling a different tune.

                              The bottom line is that the "people" no longer effect or direct the government at all. If a bunch of people want to donate $25 or $50 each, towards the potential candidate of their choice, how much influence are they getting when corporations can donate $millions to get their way instead?

                              We need to restart this system...
                              We need to make the federal government as small as possible. There is no reason for a rational thinking person who knows that the government is corrupt and run by the banks, wall street and big business to want to grow the power of the government. No matter who is the one growing it or if it "is a good idea" at the time.

                              Comment

                              • Vendzilla
                                Biker Gnome
                                • Mar 2004
                                • 23200

                                #16
                                Originally posted by BFT3K
                                I think we need to develop a "Black Out Button" for our current government.

                                $77 Billion is TWICE the budget cut figure the asswipes in Washington are currently fighting over - for planes that will never be used.

                                It's time to restart this government - with NO lobbyists and NO special interests.

                                The American people really need to reclaim their country, and I don't mean through some fake, corporate controlled, Tea Bagger movement either.
                                Having planes like this is a deterrent and is something I believe in, nobody has a plane that would stand a chance against it.

                                Having a military presence in almost every country in the world it seems is way more costly and a better place to start.

                                While I agree that a better solution of the way we run our government is needed, it's going to take more time to do that when we have a president that wants to inflate the government instead of scaling it back
                                Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
                                think about that

                                Comment

                                • Tom_PM
                                  Porn Meister
                                  • Feb 2005
                                  • 16443

                                  #17
                                  Stop voting for republicans and democrats. Thats our action item it seems. Fine with me!
                                  43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

                                  Comment

                                  • pornguy
                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                    • Mar 2003
                                    • 62912

                                    #18
                                    I see no problem with having them but I do see a problem with having so many and then not using them at all.
                                    PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

                                    AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
                                    TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!

                                    Comment

                                    • BFT3K
                                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                                      • Dec 2005
                                      • 10764

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by IllTestYourGirls
                                      We need to make the federal government as small as possible. There is no reason for a rational thinking person who knows that the government is corrupt and run by the banks, wall street and big business to want to grow the power of the government. No matter who is the one growing it or if it "is a good idea" at the time.
                                      You have to fix the system before you can make that argument.

                                      The current system is: Big Money Interests vs The People's Interests

                                      Big corps do not want government getting in the way of their profit. They want to rape the people without any checks and balances whatsoever.

                                      The Big Money People do not want environmental regulations. They do not want alternative energy research. They do not want subsidized healthcare that takes away from their profit. They do not want banking regulations, etc.

                                      Without an all-out system change the government is the only entity that stands between the people, and all-out corporate control.

                                      I don't like big government either, but unless we restart from scratch, a balance is still needed, however it can be achieved.

                                      Comment

                                      • BFT3K
                                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                                        • Dec 2005
                                        • 10764

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Vendzilla
                                        Having planes like this is a deterrent and is something I believe in, nobody has a plane that would stand a chance against it.

                                        Having a military presence in almost every country in the world it seems is way more costly and a better place to start.

                                        While I agree that a better solution of the way we run our government is needed, it's going to take more time to do that when we have a president that wants to inflate the government instead of scaling it back
                                        Who are you afraid of?

                                        These overpriced, useless planes, are a deterrent against whom?

                                        Comment

                                        • _Richard_
                                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                                          • Oct 2006
                                          • 30991

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by spazlabz
                                          yeah from what I understand it really is not fond of water so they don't fly it in the rain




                                          but it looks REALLY COOL, so we'll keep it, who wants an educated public any way LOL
                                          haha this better not be true

                                          edit: omfg hahahaha
                                          Last edited by _Richard_; 04-08-2011, 10:20 AM.

                                          Comment

                                          • Vendzilla
                                            Biker Gnome
                                            • Mar 2004
                                            • 23200

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by BFT3K
                                            Who are you afraid of?

                                            These overpriced, useless planes, are a deterrent against whom?
                                            Same reason we have trident submarines, the most powerful weapon we have, carries up to 24 ICBMs

                                            Makes the F22 look like a bi plane
                                            Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
                                            think about that

                                            Comment

                                            • dyna mo
                                              just a fucking jerk
                                              • Dec 2008
                                              • 68184

                                              #23
                                              i think this is immensely important to consider when trying to sort out the f22

                                              Origins

                                              In 1981 the United States Air Force (USAF) developed a requirement for a new air superiority fighter, the Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF), to replace the capability of the McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle, primarily the F-15A, B, C and D variants. ATF was a demonstration and validation program undertaken by the USAF to develop a next-generation air superiority fighter to counter emerging worldwide threats, including development and proliferation of Soviet-era Su-27 "Flanker"-class fighter aircraft. It was envisioned that the ATF would incorporate emerging technologies including advanced alloys and composite materials, advanced fly-by-wire flight control systems, higher power propulsion systems, and low-observable/stealth technology.

                                              A request for proposal (RFP) was issued in July 1986, and two contractor teams, Lockheed/Boeing/General Dynamics and Northrop/McDonnell Douglas were selected in October 1986 to undertake a 50-month demonstration/validation phase, culminating in the flight test of two prototype aircraft, the YF-22 and the YF-23. Each design team produced two prototypes featuring one of two engine options, one featuring thrust vectoring. The Pratt & Whitney F119 turbofan with vectored thrust was found to be worth the extra expense and complexity, as it permits a tighter turning radius, a valuable capability in dogfights.
                                              this project began with a early 1980s view on the enemy as we understood it. the pentagon gets rolling on projects like these that take decades to implement. and in the decades since the beginning of the raptor, the enemy evolved. we still have a threat the f22 can deal with (north korea, as per the article).

                                              Comment

                                              • Gouge
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • Mar 2005
                                                • 1438

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by BFT3K
                                                Who are you afraid of?

                                                These overpriced, useless planes, are a deterrent against whom?
                                                What other comparable plane are you using to determine they are overpriced in your opinion? Did you even bother to read the the very article you posted? It clearly explains why the F22 was designed, do you not comprehend the concept of generational military assets? Honestly man, why do you bother posting an article and bitch about it when you don't even understand it...trolling or attention whore you pick.

                                                Comment

                                                • CPA37710T
                                                  business ready hit me up!
                                                  • Aug 2010
                                                  • 1115

                                                  #25
                                                  pisses me off that they spend this kind of money on jets and war.. that money could be good for so many things

                                                  Comment

                                                  • BJ
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Mar 2002
                                                    • 5590

                                                    #26
                                                    fucking hippies

                                                    Comment

                                                    • BFT3K
                                                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                      • Dec 2005
                                                      • 10764

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by Vendzilla
                                                      Same reason we have trident submarines, the most powerful weapon we have, carries up to 24 ICBMs

                                                      Makes the F22 look like a bi plane
                                                      First of all you didn't answer the questions at all, but then, just to make your point even weaker, you go on to state that we already have weapons that we are not using as deterrents. So this justifies buying more overpriced toys with taxpayer money, how?

                                                      Comment

                                                      • IllTestYourGirls
                                                        Ah My Balls
                                                        • Feb 2007
                                                        • 14311

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by BFT3K
                                                        You have to fix the system before you can make that argument.

                                                        The current system is: Big Money Interests vs The People's Interests

                                                        Big corps do not want government getting in the way of their profit. They want to rape the people without any checks and balances whatsoever.

                                                        The Big Money People do not want environmental regulations. They do not want alternative energy research. They do not want subsidized healthcare that takes away from their profit. They do not want banking regulations, etc.

                                                        Without an all-out system change the government is the only entity that stands between the people, and all-out corporate control.

                                                        I don't like big government either, but unless we restart from scratch, a balance is still needed, however it can be achieved.
                                                        Only an illusion of a balance will be created. It is necessary for the states and the people to reclaim their rights from the federal government and demand that it is smaller. (not saying state governments are without corruption, but at least you can move out of a state 'easily')

                                                        You can not have these people controlling it and expect a balance. Maybe you are talking about a balance between Federal and State and The People. If that is the case you are right. But for that balance to happen the Federal and state governments MUST get smaller.

                                                        Comment

                                                        • Gouge
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Mar 2005
                                                          • 1438

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by CPA37710T
                                                          pisses me off that they spend this kind of money on jets and war.. that money could be good for so many things

                                                          So the $4.08 billion per day our government is spending is not enough for you?

                                                          Comment

                                                          • spazlabz
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Jul 2003
                                                            • 6548

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by _Richard_
                                                            haha this better not be true

                                                            edit: omfg hahahaha
                                                            I know, it is unbelievable right?
                                                            The United States' top fighter jet, the Lockheed Martin F-22, has recently required more than 30 hours of maintenance for every hour in the skies, pushing its hourly cost of flying to more than $44,000, a far higher figure than for the warplane it replaces, confidential Pentagon test results show.
                                                            This Story

                                                            The aircraft's radar-absorbing metallic skin is the principal cause of its maintenance troubles, with unexpected shortcomings -- such as vulnerability to rain and other abrasion -- challenging Air Force and contractor technicians since the mid-1990s, according to Pentagon officials, internal documents and a former engineer.
                                                            source
                                                            http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...070903020.html

                                                            Comment

                                                            • Vendzilla
                                                              Biker Gnome
                                                              • Mar 2004
                                                              • 23200

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by BFT3K
                                                              First of all you didn't answer the questions at all, but then, just to make your point even weaker, you go on to state that we already have weapons that we are not using as deterrents. So this justifies buying more overpriced toys with taxpayer money, how?
                                                              I did answer your question, you just don't have an understanding of what a deterrant is.

                                                              military strength or an ability to defend a country or retaliate strongly enough to deter an enemy from attacking.

                                                              No one will strike a country that has the ability to remove them from the map, thats what a Trident submarine can do and they are on deployment

                                                              As far as the F22, it was designed before the modern warfare tactics had changed. Personally I think they should improve on the warthog platform

                                                              Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
                                                              think about that

                                                              Comment

                                                              • BFT3K
                                                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                • Dec 2005
                                                                • 10764

                                                                #32
                                                                Should our tax dollars be used to pay for alternate energy research, or for subsides for Big Oil?

                                                                Should our tax dollars be used to supplement health care for people in need, or for supplements and breaks for Big Pharma?

                                                                Should our tax dollars be used to safeguard clean water, food, and air, or for Wall Street bailouts and bonuses?

                                                                For infrastructure issues here in the US, or for rebuilding Afghanistan?

                                                                Do we cut off medicare and medicaid, or give tax breaks for the rich instead, etc....

                                                                Comment

                                                                • BFT3K
                                                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                  • Dec 2005
                                                                  • 10764

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by Vendzilla
                                                                  I did answer your question, you just don't have an understanding of what a deterrant is.

                                                                  military strength or an ability to defend a country or retaliate strongly enough to deter an enemy from attacking.

                                                                  No one will strike a country that has the ability to remove them from the map, thats what a Trident submarine can do and they are on deployment

                                                                  As far as the F22, it was designed before the modern warfare tactics had changed. Personally I think they should improve on the warthog platform.
                                                                  You still haven't answered, so I ask again...

                                                                  Who are you afraid of?

                                                                  And these overpriced, useless planes, are a deterrent against whom?

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • Scott McD
                                                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                    • Nov 2002
                                                                    • 67798

                                                                    #34
                                                                    We are cutting all services here, yet we just sent another £650 million to Pakistan for some reason.

                                                                    You couldn't make the shit up...


                                                                    I Buy My High Quality Traffic Here, You Should Too!

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • bronco67
                                                                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                      • Dec 2006
                                                                      • 29032

                                                                      #35
                                                                      It's just a jobs program. Nothing more, nothing less.

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • spazlabz
                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                        • Jul 2003
                                                                        • 6548

                                                                        #36
                                                                        Originally posted by Vendzilla
                                                                        I did answer your question, you just don't have an understanding of what a deterrant is.

                                                                        military strength or an ability to defend a country or retaliate strongly enough to deter an enemy from attacking.

                                                                        No one will strike a country that has the ability to remove them from the map, thats what a Trident submarine can do and they are on deployment

                                                                        As far as the F22, it was designed before the modern warfare tactics had changed. Personally I think they should improve on the warthog platform

                                                                        the A10 is a bad ass little tank killer. My dad was in the USAF when they were first doing tests on it and told me about how when the .50 cal on the nose burped it cracked the air frame! Lots of re-engineering had to be done but I think it is one of the most effective fixed wing aircraft the US has

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • Vendzilla
                                                                          Biker Gnome
                                                                          • Mar 2004
                                                                          • 23200

                                                                          #37
                                                                          Originally posted by BFT3K
                                                                          Who are you afraid of??
                                                                          No one, that's the point.

                                                                          If you're holding an AR-15 in a room full of guys holding broomsticks, who are you going to be afraid of?

                                                                          Originally posted by spazlabz
                                                                          the A10 is a bad ass little tank killer. My dad was in the USAF when they were first doing tests on it and told me about how when the .50 cal on the nose burped it cracked the air frame! Lots of re-engineering had to be done but I think it is one of the most effective fixed wing aircraft the US has
                                                                          It's been thru a lot changes, but you can shoot half it's wing off and it can still get the pilot home
                                                                          Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
                                                                          think about that

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • theking
                                                                            Nice Kitty
                                                                            • Sep 2002
                                                                            • 21053

                                                                            #38
                                                                            Originally posted by spazlabz
                                                                            the A10 is a bad ass little tank killer. My dad was in the USAF when they were first doing tests on it and told me about how when the .50 cal on the nose burped it cracked the air frame! Lots of re-engineering had to be done but I think it is one of the most effective fixed wing aircraft the US has
                                                                            It does not have a .50 cal on its nose.
                                                                            When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                                            FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • Gouge
                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                              • Mar 2005
                                                                              • 1438

                                                                              #39
                                                                              Originally posted by BFT3K
                                                                              Should our tax dollars be used to pay for alternate energy research, or for subsides for Big Oil?
                                                                              We already have the NREL that is %100 government funded.

                                                                              Originally posted by BFT3K
                                                                              Should our tax dollars be used to supplement health care for people in need, or for supplements and breaks for Big Pharma?
                                                                              We already have Obama Care...Duh!

                                                                              Originally posted by BFT3K
                                                                              Should our tax dollars be used to safeguard clean water, food, and air, or for Wall Street bailouts and bonuses?
                                                                              We already have some 3,000 EPA safeguards in place.

                                                                              Originally posted by BFT3K
                                                                              For infrastructure issues here in the US, or for rebuilding Afghanistan?
                                                                              We already did stimulus packages, TARP, state bailouts and the shovel ready jobs Obama ran on as a campaign promise.

                                                                              Originally posted by BFT3K
                                                                              Do we cut off medicare and medicaid, or give tax breaks for the rich instead, etc....
                                                                              We already have hospitals that by law treat people with no medicare and medicaid and or insurance.

                                                                              In conclusion you just want more of the same, more big government, more spending and more government control.

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • robwod
                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                • Nov 2005
                                                                                • 2540

                                                                                #40
                                                                                Originally posted by Vendzilla
                                                                                No one will strike a country that has the ability to remove them from the map, thats what a Trident submarine can do and they are on deployment.
                                                                                At the risk of getting involved in this thread, this statement is false. If it were true, then the US would never have been attacked on 9/11.

                                                                                When you have a country, or group of people, who believe martyrdom is the way to eternal bliss, then a threat of death is hardly a deterrent.

                                                                                While not a US citizen, I think the US military budgets almost certainly have areas where money is better spent on other things on domestic soil versus foreign soil.
                                                                                Last edited by robwod; 04-08-2011, 12:39 PM.
                                                                                NSFW

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • directfiesta
                                                                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                  • Oct 2002
                                                                                  • 30135

                                                                                  #41
                                                                                  Originally posted by Vendzilla
                                                                                  I did answer your question, you just don't have an understanding of what a deterrant is.
                                                                                  no you didn't....

                                                                                  Here was the question you so called " answered " :

                                                                                  Originally posted by BFT3K
                                                                                  Who are you afraid of?

                                                                                  These overpriced, useless planes, are a deterrent against whom?
                                                                                  .. and you answer : the eneemy ... lol ... what a generic response .. might as well say " the bad guys " ...

                                                                                  So, WHO are those enemies that such artillery is required to keep in check ???
                                                                                  I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

                                                                                  But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • dyna mo
                                                                                    just a fucking jerk
                                                                                    • Dec 2008
                                                                                    • 68184

                                                                                    #42
                                                                                    from the original article-

                                                                                    "[The F-22s] are in an area where they would be solely or more suited for a sophisticated adversary like North Korea," Babione told ABC News. "In particular, its ability to penetrate highly defended locations -- such as North Korea -- only the Raptor would be able to get in there and prosecute the missions."

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • directfiesta
                                                                                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                      • Oct 2002
                                                                                      • 30135

                                                                                      #43
                                                                                      Originally posted by Scott McD
                                                                                      We are cutting all services here, yet we just sent another £650 million to Pakistan for some reason.

                                                                                      You couldn't make the shit up...
                                                                                      come on ... that cannot be true ...
                                                                                      =======
                                                                                      Sesame Street comes to Pakistan

                                                                                      US government aid agency sponsors $20m Pakistani remake of the American kids' TV show



                                                                                      There's no Cookie Monster, no Big Bird and no Count von Count.

                                                                                      But Pakistani children will soon start experiencing what millions in the west have done for more than four decades ? the joys of Sesame Street.

                                                                                      In a $20m (£12m) remake of the classic American children's programme, the setting for the show has moved from the streets of New York to a lively village in Pakistan with a roadside tea and snacks stall, known as a dhaba, some fancy houses with overhanging balconies along with simple dwellings, and residents hanging out on their verandas.

                                                                                      The Pakistani version, in which characters will speak mostly in Urdu, will feature Rani, a cute six-year-old Muppet, the child of a peasant farmer, with pigtails, flowers in her hair and a smart blue-and-white school uniform. Her curiosity and questions about the world will, it is hoped, make her a role model for Pakistani children.

                                                                                      The financing for the series comes from USAid, the economic assistance arm of the US government, which aims to help the country's young learn some basic words and numbers through Sesame Street's fun style of education. Pakistan's schooling system is failing badly, a major reason for a descent into religious conservatism and economic stagnation.

                                                                                      and it continues .... :
                                                                                      http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011...an?INTCMP=SRCH

                                                                                      I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

                                                                                      But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • theking
                                                                                        Nice Kitty
                                                                                        • Sep 2002
                                                                                        • 21053

                                                                                        #44
                                                                                        Originally posted by directfiesta
                                                                                        no you didn't....

                                                                                        Here was the question you so called " answered " :



                                                                                        .. and you answer : the eneemy ... lol ... what a generic response .. might as well say " the bad guys " ...

                                                                                        So, WHO are those enemies that such artillery is required to keep in check ???
                                                                                        Any one they may give it even a passing thought.
                                                                                        When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                                                        FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • Gouge
                                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                                          • Mar 2005
                                                                                          • 1438

                                                                                          #45
                                                                                          Originally posted by robwod
                                                                                          At the risk of getting involved in this thread, this statement is false. If it were true, then the US would never have been attacked on 9/11.

                                                                                          When you have a country, or group of people, who believe martyrdom is the way to eternal bliss, then a threat of death is hardly a deterrent.

                                                                                          While not a US citizen, I think the US military budgets almost certainly have areas where money is better spent on other things on domestic soil versus foreign soil.
                                                                                          The 9/11 attacks where done by terrorist not by a sovereign nation flying under the representation of a flag and government...huge difference between the two.

                                                                                          Vendzilla unlike BFT3K and his ilk is thinking down the road, long term and large scale like India, China, Russia, North Korea and Iran. If someone is not willing to put the future of those countries in perspective then they are seriously misguided as a individual.

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life
                                                                                            (felis madjewicus)
                                                                                            • Jul 2006
                                                                                            • 20368

                                                                                            #46
                                                                                            I was under the impression that as far as sheer mechanics are concerned the new generation MIGs were still a superior plane. It's not until all the other tech trickery comes into play that the F22 blows them out of the water. No t much point in having a faster, more reliable jet if it can't even find the enemy. Man some of the shit they got loaded into that F22 is ridiculous.
                                                                                            Last edited by Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life; 04-08-2011, 12:57 PM.

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • Vendzilla
                                                                                              Biker Gnome
                                                                                              • Mar 2004
                                                                                              • 23200

                                                                                              #47
                                                                                              Originally posted by robwod
                                                                                              At the risk of getting involved in this thread, this statement is false. If it were true, then the US would never have been attacked on 9/11.

                                                                                              When you have a country, or group of people, who believe martyrdom is the way to eternal bliss, then a threat of death is hardly a deterrent.

                                                                                              While not a US citizen, I think the US military budgets almost certainly have areas where money is better spent on other things on domestic soil versus foreign soil.
                                                                                              And you think that the people that attacked us are sane?
                                                                                              Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
                                                                                              think about that

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • robwod
                                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                                • Nov 2005
                                                                                                • 2540

                                                                                                #48
                                                                                                Originally posted by Gouge
                                                                                                The 9/11 attacks where done by terrorist not by a sovereign nation flying under the representation of a flag and government...huge difference between the two.
                                                                                                Agreed. but the point is, to use "deterrent" as an argument is flawed. The fact is the US was indeed attacked despite all the security (at the time), intelligence reports, well-known and well-documented firepower. I will agree that certain levels of posturing with the ability to back it militarily will indeed deter some people, organizations or even countries, but it won't deter all.

                                                                                                And I am doubtful Kim Jong Ill is remotely concerned over anything the US has militarily. He's a loose canon in every sense, that I can see. I just can't see any amount of military might altering that man's sense of determination to cause problems.
                                                                                                NSFW

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • BFT3K
                                                                                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                                  • Dec 2005
                                                                                                  • 10764

                                                                                                  #49
                                                                                                  Originally posted by Gouge
                                                                                                  The 9/11 attacks where done by terrorist not by a sovereign nation flying under the representation of a flag and government...huge difference between the two.

                                                                                                  Vendzilla unlike BFT3K and his ilk is thinking down the road, long term and large scale like India, China, Russia, North Korea and Iran. If someone is not willing to put the future of those countries in perspective then they are seriously misguided as a individual.
                                                                                                  Be afraid, be very afraid!

                                                                                                  Fund bombs instead of health care - fund redundant jets instead of developing alternate energies - fund Haliburton instead of improving US infrastructure.

                                                                                                  Be afraid, be very afraid!

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • Vendzilla
                                                                                                    Biker Gnome
                                                                                                    • Mar 2004
                                                                                                    • 23200

                                                                                                    #50
                                                                                                    Originally posted by directfiesta
                                                                                                    no you didn't....

                                                                                                    Here was the question you so called " answered " :



                                                                                                    .. and you answer : the eneemy ... lol ... what a generic response .. might as well say " the bad guys " ...

                                                                                                    So, WHO are those enemies that such artillery is required to keep in check ???
                                                                                                    I answered the question with an answer that wasn't on your list, don't get your panties in a twist
                                                                                                    Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
                                                                                                    think about that

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    Working...