Quote:
Originally Posted by BFT3K
First of all you didn't answer the questions at all, but then, just to make your point even weaker, you go on to state that we already have weapons that we are not using as deterrents. So this justifies buying more overpriced toys with taxpayer money, how?
|
I did answer your question, you just don't have an understanding of what a deterrant is.
military strength or an ability to defend a country or retaliate strongly enough to deter an enemy from attacking.
No one will strike a country that has the ability to remove them from the map, thats what a Trident submarine can do and they are on deployment
As far as the F22, it was designed before the modern warfare tactics had changed. Personally I think they should improve on the warthog platform
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that