Vote on who you think put up this page on Twitter?

Customers are king, not content.
Paul Markham has been sharing with us his genius retarded ideas about why you should use download limiters and choke PAYING CUSTOMERS bandwidth over at the zoo. He also thinks that rotating content gives you high retention.

Most people told him he was being an idiot to punish legit punters like this.

As usual, he wouldn?t listen.

But it seems his customers are REALLY pissed off with him about it. Let?s take a look at Rabbits?

Comments by: Recycled, Rotated, Redated ? Score: 60/100 ? Date: 11/25/2009
The same photos are just recycled. I know because I?ve joined numerous times when my favorite model?s set are all on the site at the same time. I swear off porn, delete everything, and rejoin on the 3-day trial months later to download Steffi?s (Ameile on their site) 3 old photo sets. The content is low and picture quality, ?vintage?. Some old classic stuff. On the plus side, I like PM?s poses ? more explicit and natural. Girl next door, not too glammed up like Twistys or DDF for example. If there were more content, new content, and none of the constant recycling of old material, I?d give this site a much higher score.

Comments by: Night Bird ? Score: 70/100 ? Date: 1/5/2009
Content rotation kills this site. This site is made for the trial member, because if you stay monthly you will just see the same old videos disappear and then reappear as new releases over and over and over. Some of the content is good, but there needs to be more new material and the content rotation must stop. Content rotation kills this site. This site is made for the trial member, because if you stay monthly you will just see the same old videos disappear and then reappear as new releases over and over and over. Some of the content is good, but there needs to be more new material and the content rotation must stop.

Comments by: nightowl ? Score: 75/100 ? Date: 6/3/2008
Too much recyling by date changes. CHEATING!!!!

Comments by: former member ? Score: 100/100 ? Date: 4/5/2008
not worth paying and it s cheating ? ading old files and new updates by simpyl chaning dates of the files.

Comments by: SgtSally ? Score: 25/100 ? Date: 2/11/2008
Sorry, the site doesn t come up to standards. The gals aren t that cute for the most part. Too old and usually flawed in some way ? teeth, boobs, skin. Something is almost always off. The site limit wasn t a problem for me but I really didn t download all that much after I had a look around.

Comments by: Sam ? Score: 5/100 ? Date: 8/20/2007
If you like downloading stuff and have broadband access, forget this site. It has a huge archive and new stuff everyday but they don t want you to download it. you can only download 1 file at a time and if you download too much they suspend your account for 24h! and the limit is like 500mb per day! Plus downloads are very slow, i rarely get more than 200kB/s and on other sites i can DL at 1200kB/s

Comments by: Pete ? Score: 60/100 ? Date: N/A
If you want to download, keep on surfing past this site! Multiple server resets, broken links, download limiters etc. Only ONE video download at a time! And if you want HC boy/girl video, the content is miniscule, and most of the teens are 30 year olds in pigtails. Good young looking solo video/photo, but the download restrictions make this site an overall 0 to me.

?

This is the problem that was written ago in The ClueTrain in 1999. Our customers are now an interconnected community. And they share information if you offer a shit product.

Remember, it?s 2011. Bandwidth is really cheap. If you are LUCKY enough to get someone prepared to hand you over actual cash money for your site, don?t fuck them over.

If you are worried about a 3 buck trial burning your bandwidth, don?t offer a 3 buck trial.

Treat a paying punter like a god, not a pain in the ass.