Porno flick titled "nappy headed ho's" to drop

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BlackIraqMan
    So Fucking Banned
    • Apr 2007
    • 373

    #1

    Porno flick titled "nappy headed ho's" to drop



    Porn producer Kick Ass Pictures is getting into the charity game. The adult entertainment company, which bills itself as "the only porn company in the world to guarantee all natural breasts in all of its movies" says they are releasing a new adult DVD tiled "Nappy Headed Ho's." They say $1 from the sale of each DVD will be donated to a retirement fund for fired Don Imus.

    The film will feature "girls with closely twisted or curled hair (the dictionary definition of 'nappy'), who have sex for money (the dictionary definition of 'ho')." This promises to be a great leap for society.

    In a press release, Kick Ass president Mark Kulkis said, "We see this as a free speech issue. As an adult media company, we're especially defensive of free speech. Don Imus is a loudmouth and perhaps a bigot. However, CBS Radio was hypocritical in hiring Imus to be blunt and outspoken, then firing him for the same reason. Fellow broadcast personalities Ann Coulter and Pat Robertson spew anti-gay and fag slurs, yet they are not fired by their networks." Hmmm, porno with integrity!

    Kulkis says that if Imus turns down their donations, they'll donate them to the United Dumb hahahahahaha College Fund. As Imus proves, a white mans mind is a terrible thing to waste.
  • Subtle
    Confirmed User
    • Jun 2007
    • 2005

    #2
    Interesting piece of news!

    ----- Blog Themes for $49 -----
    ------ INSTANT DELIVERY ------

    Comment

    • Michaelious
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2004
      • 6720

      #3
      That's an interesting dvd, racist? lol.

      Comment

      • DWB
        Registered User
        • Jul 2003
        • 31779

        #4
        It was only a matter of time before someone in our industry jumped all over that title. Don't know what took them so long.

        Comment

        • Dvae
          Confirmed User
          • Feb 2005
          • 5326

          #5
          Nice gesture but I doubt he needs it.

          Last I heard he was going to sue CBS for $120 mil.
          .
          .

          Arguing with a troll is a lot like wrestling in the mud with a pig, after a couple of hours you realize the pig likes it.

          Comment

          • The Walrus
            So Fucking Banned
            • Mar 2007
            • 898

            #6
            Originally posted by DirtyWhiteBoy
            It was only a matter of time before someone in our industry jumped all over that title. Don't know what took them so long.
            The onl;`y problem with this statement is that this piece of shit is not nonly ont a SOMEONE, but not INDUSTRY either.

            Comment

            • ousermatera
              Registered User
              • Mar 2007
              • 69

              #7
              Very interesting !!
              christophe
              French porn : www.explicite-art.com
              Affiliation program : www.rebootcash.com

              Comment

              • Donkey Punch
                Confirmed User
                • Jun 2007
                • 1260

                #8
                haha, nice follow up
                ICQ:407-837-607
                Hosting a Problem? Phat Servers = Answer

                Comment

                • sortie
                  Confirmed User
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 7771

                  #9
                  Originally posted by The Walrus
                  The onl;`y problem with this statement is that this piece of shit is not nonly ont a SOMEONE, but not INDUSTRY either.
                  WTF? That's some nappy headed english.

                  Comment

                  • DWB
                    Registered User
                    • Jul 2003
                    • 31779

                    #10
                    Originally posted by The Walrus
                    The onl;`y problem with this statement is that this piece of shit is not nonly ont a SOMEONE, but not INDUSTRY either.
                    I'm not sure what you said there... say again?

                    Comment

                    Working...