Google hints at banning sites that buy links for SE rankings

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fetishblog
    Confirmed User
    • Sep 2005
    • 5995

    #1

    Google hints at banning sites that buy links for SE rankings

    I was reading this article about the new search engine that CBS owns called Mahalo.com. All of the search result pages are hand made by a person. Well Matt Cutts, Google's Search Quality Engineer, was talking about the level of human interaction at Google, and then I saw this:

    Additional human interaction might come if Google decides to allow anyone to report people who buy links in order to try to improve their search rankings. "I wouldn't be surprised if we add something on the Webmaster console to report that," Cutts said.
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/infoworld/20...nfoworld/89077

    Fling.com doesn't steal your traffic and sales unlike some other dating companies. I promote them, and so should you!
  • KimJI
    Confirmed User
    • May 2007
    • 1839

    #2
    wont ever happend
    Trafficadept | Best traffic I have ever tested | web "@t" cuul.org

    Comment

    • MartiniGirl
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2007
      • 183

      #3
      Pure BS.
      PussyCash.com, you get the two best things in life: PUSSY & CA$H

      Comment

      • bobbyjuly
        Confirmed User
        • Jun 2006
        • 404

        #4
        thats interesting!
        http://www.whoisnexxxt.com Where Adult Stars come to play!

        Comment

        • RawAlex
          So Fucking Banned
          • Oct 2003
          • 9465

          #5
          It is an interesting threat, but the reality is that Google has steadfastly refused to do any human checking of links or SERPs, and they aren't going to suddenly hire thousands of people to deal with bogus complaints.

          Google is "this close" to having totally irrelevant results in many of the major SERPs, putting them closer to losing their number one standing. They have way bigger issues to deal with than a few paid links.

          Comment

          • AdamG
            Registered User
            • Mar 2007
            • 65

            #6
            Interesting article, but it does not seem realistic for the moment

            www.CashAssociate.com The Ultimate PE Affiliate Program- 50% Commissions
            www.EuroExtender.com The Most Comfortable Penis Extender
            www.X4labs.com The Most Advanced Penis Traction Device

            ICQ 435701185 or rob [at] cashassociate.com

            Comment

            • mattz
              Confirmed User
              • Dec 2001
              • 7697

              #7
              Even if it does happen, it's going to be hard as hell for them to tell if you bought a link

              Comment

              • Kevsh
                Confirmed User
                • Dec 2004
                • 8619

                #8
                Google puts out so many false alarms, they must have graduated from the George W. Bush school of fear-mongering.

                Simply put: It can't work.
                Why not?

                Scenario: I rank #2 for a hugely competitive keyword and similarly for a bunch of related words. I go and buy a text link for the #1 site from any of the hundreds of know paid link sites. I report it to Google. They get banned/penalized.

                Is it worth it to buy a $5, $15, $50 link in hopes of getting my competitor penalized? Of course, if the result is I get top spot and thousands of extra visitors per day.
                Last edited by Kevsh; 06-05-2007, 01:45 PM.

                Comment

                • TheJimmy
                  ICQ- five seven 0 2 5 5 0
                  • Jan 2001
                  • 10747

                  #9
                  old drama, was a bunch of shit talking a few weeks ago when Matt brought that up on his blog...
                  Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.

                  Comment

                  • D
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jan 2006
                    • 7412

                    #10
                    They could easily incorporate the number of complaints in the matrix determining the dominant eigenvalues so that it impacts someone's pagerank without the need of hiring a single additional staffer.

                    I imagine they could do that for any number of wiki-type inputs.
                    -D.
                    ICQ: 202-96-31

                    Comment

                    • fuzebox
                      making it rain
                      • Oct 2003
                      • 22367

                      #11
                      In most cases there'd be no way to prove the links were bought.

                      Such as with ours.

                      Comment

                      • dcortez
                        DINO CORTEZ™
                        • Jun 2003
                        • 2145

                        #12
                        They don't have to prove anything. All they need to do is suspect a site enough to dump it. It's their rules and it's not democratic.

                        "TrustRank" was a concept introduced to balance between algo and human qualification of links.

                        LinkStoppers for Google - that would be a hoot.

                        I wonder what the registrar spoofers are thinking now?

                        Did you invest in multiple class-C's to fake up your rankings. Hope they don't start compiling a list of known Class C's used for page rank manipulation.

                        Did you really think they would stop at link farms?

                        Comment

                        • VexXxed
                          Confirmed User
                          • Sep 2006
                          • 544

                          #13
                          I guess that means everyone buying links through Adwords is gonna be banned.

                          Comment

                          • chupacabra
                            Confirmed User
                            • Sep 2002
                            • 3626

                            #14
                            don't see how it could be true, but i would welcome it... true and not 'purchased' relevance in search results would be a welcome thing to me..
                            ...promise her a defamation, tell her where the rain will fall..

                            Comment

                            • dcortez
                              DINO CORTEZ™
                              • Jun 2003
                              • 2145

                              #15
                              Originally posted by VexXxed
                              I guess that means everyone buying links through Adwords is gonna be banned.
                              Does anyone actually net in black with adwords? How close are the margins?

                              Some of the SEO forums do talk about adwords links being valued differently.

                              Comment

                              • global-girl
                                Confirmed User
                                • Apr 2007
                                • 151

                                #16
                                Originally posted by Kevsh
                                Google puts out so many false alarms, they must have graduated from the George W. Bush school of fear-mongering.

                                www.adultmobilesolutions.com
                                [email protected]

                                Comment

                                Working...