Well I always kinda figured I'd get cancer, just not at age 38.

Learn to read, jackass..

learn to be a man and admit when your wrong..

PS: Theres no such thing as Karma and only disfunctional liberal fruitcakes like Smokey The Idiot think there is.

Answer your question?

yup thats all i asked to begin with.. if you had just said that to begin with i wouldnt have had to call you out for being a liar.

p.s. i'm not a liberal

6 instances (in 3 plus years) of me using somewhat abrasive sarcasm and trolling is in no way "wishing cancer on someone often". Not by anyones standards.

You're the fucking liar, and you can burn in hell. I'm done with this conversation. I'm better than you and I've wasted enough time on this, and you.

I hope you get nutsack cancer

Now I can wish ovarian cancer on her and shit.

You're a god damned idiot and I hope you get nutsack cancer.

I hope you get eyeball AND nutsack cancer and die.

I hope you all get ass cancer

I hope you die of Shit On The Optic Nerve Cancer.

just because i hate you


i hope you get dick cancer and die,

that would be groovy.

don't know why you continue on with this ..

me neither, but i thought it was an interesting question seeing as how he said all those things.

Nobody is perfect i'm certainly not claiming to be, i don't know if karma is real or not but i would like to hope so i think..

I have said many things that i regret to people and wish i could take back , i often wonder when bad things happen if it's a result of these regrets..

anyways i hold no ill will towards jim and hope he gets better , if he wants to answer the question he can if not i don't blame him.

Seriously hope you get better dude.

Hey Smokey why don't you give your act a rest.

This ain't the time or the place for this shit.

Congrats, you just made sure I will never do business with you. I mean NEVER, in ANY way, shape or form.

I'm not sure you wanted to burn the bridge you did tonight.

I have a LONG memory motherfucker.

I'm embarrassed enough to have lowered myself to this level, and I'm ending it.

To everyone else, I and my family deeply appreciate the well wishes. Thank you.

... He's alive and happy and cancer free. Just don't rely on medicine and doctors to heal you .... you need to heal yourself as well.

This is something I've noticed all over GFY. in the third post the OP says he quit smoking 5 years ago, and withing minutes 7 people post advising him to quit smoking. Does anybody here actually read threads? Serious question...

Kick the cancers ass, Jim!

It was caught VERY VERY early so my haters can fuck off and not starting planning road trips to piss on my grave just yet.

Hey Jim, plz hit me up on ICQ when u get a chance, thnx

Last thing anyone here should be doing IMO, is making you angry. .

sorry even people with cancer dont get to call me a liar when i ask them a valid question.

The largest study conducted on the matter suggests exactly what Huggles just said:

Study Finds No Cancer-Marijuana Connection

By Marc Kaufman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, May 26, 2006; A03

The largest study of its kind has unexpectedly concluded that smoking marijuana, even regularly and heavily, does not lead to lung cancer.

The new findings "were against our expectations," said Donald Tashkin of the University of California at Los Angeles, a pulmonologist who has studied marijuana for 30 years.

"We hypothesized that there would be a positive association between marijuana use and lung cancer, and that the association would be more positive with heavier use," he said. "What we found instead was no association at all, and even a suggestion of some protective effect."

Federal health and drug enforcement officials have widely used Tashkin's previous work on marijuana to make the case that the drug is dangerous. Tashkin said that while he still believes marijuana is potentially harmful, its cancer-causing effects appear to be of less concern than previously thought.

Earlier work established that marijuana does contain cancer-causing chemicals as potentially harmful as those in tobacco, he said. However, marijuana also contains the chemical THC, which he said may kill aging cells and keep them from becoming cancerous.

Tashkin's study, funded by the National Institutes of Health's National Institute on Drug Abuse, involved 1,200 people in Los Angeles who had lung, neck or head cancer and an additional 1,040 people without cancer matched by age, sex and neighborhood.

They were all asked about their lifetime use of marijuana, tobacco and alcohol. The heaviest marijuana smokers had lighted up more than 22,000 times, while moderately heavy usage was defined as smoking 11,000 to 22,000 marijuana cigarettes. Tashkin found that even the very heavy marijuana smokers showed no increased incidence of the three cancers studied.

"This is the largest case-control study ever done, and everyone had to fill out a very extensive questionnaire about marijuana use," he said. "Bias can creep into any research, but we controlled for as many confounding factors as we could, and so I believe these results have real meaning."

Tashkin's group at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA had hypothesized that marijuana would raise the risk of cancer on the basis of earlier small human studies, lab studies of animals, and the fact that marijuana users inhale more deeply and generally hold smoke in their lungs longer than tobacco smokers -- exposing them to the dangerous chemicals for a longer time. In addition, Tashkin said, previous studies found that marijuana tar has 50 percent higher concentrations of chemicals linked to cancer than tobacco cigarette tar.

While no association between marijuana smoking and cancer was found, the study findings, presented to the American Thoracic Society International Conference this week, did find a 20-fold increase in lung cancer among people who smoked two or more packs of cigarettes a day.

The study was limited to people younger than 60 because those older than that were generally not exposed to marijuana in their youth, when it is most often tried.

6 instances (in 3 plus years) of me using somewhat abrasive sarcasm and trolling is in no way "wishing cancer on someone often". Not by anyones standards.

You're the fucking liar, and you can burn in hell. I'm done with this conversation. I'm better than you and I've wasted enough time on this, and you.

How insane of me to think you wished cancer upon people when you use the exact words.. dayumm.