Quote:
Originally Posted by livecamd
Please ask yourself this: Why from all this huge webcam sites out there, you are the only one that has a problem with EU girls. You have been in this industry for so many years and still fail to watch closely what your competition was doing. ...
... Maybe there is a language barrier, however you should stay to think for a second.....why was not a problem for other websites to grow even bigger with those EU models online.
|
It's not that I personally have a problem with EU girls. The problem was with their sales on LiveCamNetwork.com where they simply did not convert. In fact, many of our end users complained about them. We were fair and gave (and continue to give) every EU girl a chance.
LiveCamNetwork.com also did not purchase traffic that was suitable for EU girls, but then again it was not our responsibility to promote your models. Our #1 responsibility is to the support of our software.
If you consider EU girls to be a niche (like "Russian Brides" for example) and you advertise properly to attract customers in that niche, then it should work.
Quote:
Originally Posted by livecamd
And the answer to that is simple: look above to this thread and where I say that your vision about this is limited and YOU didn't allow yourself or others to build this network.
|
If this was true then sites like Daddylive and southern charms would not be still running our software. We do not care what types of chat models you have on your OWN site, but we reserve the right as we have always done to pick and choose who we want to keep on LiveCamNetwork.com. After all, we spend money to promote it. Why shouldn't we make sure we use only good converting models?
Quote:
Originally Posted by livecamd
It's never to late to change, but to do the same thing over and over again expecting different results.....hm, you know the answer to this.
|
I am sorry you feel this way LiveCamMD but I urge you to reconsider everything I have said. If you would like to talk us voice we are more than willing to listen to your concerns.
Regards,
Mark Prince