FBI Inspects JT Video Records "very important"

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tony286
    lurker
    • Aug 2002
    • 57021

    #1

    FBI Inspects JT Video Records "very important"

    Read this one its important two of the violations they got him on where:
    Not having a real address and not keeping 20 business hours a week.


    http://avn.com/index.php?Primary_Nav...tent_ID=289645
  • GooSearch
    Confirmed User
    • Oct 2006
    • 2538

    #2
    the man is just puttin the smackdown on everyone lately
    GooSearch Real Text Ads Without The Drama
    Coming Back Bigger and Better Then Ever

    Comment

    • LiveDose
      Show Yer Tits!
      • Feb 2002
      • 25792

      #3
      Nice link Tony.

      As unpleasant as this is for producers it does sound like they were being very reasonable.

      Scammer Alert: acer19 acer [email protected] [email protected] Money stolen using PayPal

      Comment

      • baddog
        So Fucking Banned
        • Apr 2001
        • 107089

        #4
        He knew he was violating the law, did it anyway.

        Comment

        • sicone
          Retired
          • Jan 2004
          • 18453

          #5
          This will be a interesting one to watch.

          Comment

          • tony299
            lurker
            • Aug 2002
            • 57021

            #6
            Originally posted by baddog
            He knew he was violating the law, did it anyway.
            And probably 90 percent of all webmasters are in the same boat, thats why I posted it. They have to wake up .

            Comment

            • D
              Confirmed User
              • Jan 2006
              • 7412

              #7
              Good link. Thanks.
              -D.
              ICQ: 202-96-31

              Comment

              • crockett
                in a van by the river
                • May 2003
                • 76818

                #8
                As a TGP/Blog owner, this stuff just makes me want to sell all my sites and just produce content to sell. At least that way I would know my 2257 records were in order.

                As a free site operator there is still no real way to be fully compliant. It will be an interesting day when the first "non" producer is inspected.
                In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                Comment

                • RawAlex
                  So Fucking Banned
                  • Oct 2003
                  • 9465

                  #9
                  First off, I would have to say anyone using a PO Box / Mail drop should take notice: If the man comes looking, you are fucked. It wouldn't take the man much effort to pull a list of UPS stories, mailboxes etc, and other known drop boxes and run them against 2257 record addresses. If you are doing this, now would be a very good time to fix your shit.

                  Second, the 20 hour rule is an interesting problem, and something that if he is in fact charged with should be fought in a court of law. If you are a company that produces one single scene and sells it to another company to distribute, you then become required to keep 20 hours a week of regular office hours to be available for record inspection for your one movie (and two performers).

                  That is unduely burdensome on small producers, part time companies, and occassional producers. It would have the effect of limiting free speech, because unless you had the intention of making an ongoing business of shooting porn, you wouldn't should just a single set.

                  I hope the lawyers are all over this like a dirty shirt. That is certainly part of the law that needs to be challenged. I cannot find any other industry where the government mandates minimum hours of operation, to be available for an inspection of records that might come once a year... 1000 hours for a 1 hour inspection. That is incredibly burdensome.

                  Comment

                  • TheSenator
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 13330

                    #10
                    Originally posted by crockett
                    As a TGP/Blog owner, this stuff just makes me want to sell all my sites and just produce content to sell. At least that way I would know my 2257 records were in order.

                    As a free site operator there is still no real way to be fully compliant. It will be an interesting day when the first "non" producer is inspected.
                    Yeah, I would hate that day.

                    TGP owner would be fucked.
                    ISeekGirls.com since 2005

                    Comment

                    • V_RocKs
                      Damn Right I Kiss Ass!
                      • Nov 2003
                      • 32466

                      #11
                      Nice to know the FBI surfs one of the shittiest navigation websites for Gay porn.... They must have spent a lot of time there...

                      It feels good to know they are homos.

                      Comment

                      • V_RocKs
                        Damn Right I Kiss Ass!
                        • Nov 2003
                        • 32466

                        #12
                        Originally posted by RawAlex
                        First off, I would have to say anyone using a PO Box / Mail drop should take notice: If the man comes looking, you are fucked. It wouldn't take the man much effort to pull a list of UPS stories, mailboxes etc, and other known drop boxes and run them against 2257 record addresses. If you are doing this, now would be a very good time to fix your shit.

                        Second, the 20 hour rule is an interesting problem, and something that if he is in fact charged with should be fought in a court of law. If you are a company that produces one single scene and sells it to another company to distribute, you then become required to keep 20 hours a week of regular office hours to be available for record inspection for your one movie (and two performers).

                        That is unduely burdensome on small producers, part time companies, and occassional producers. It would have the effect of limiting free speech, because unless you had the intention of making an ongoing business of shooting porn, you wouldn't should just a single set.

                        I hope the lawyers are all over this like a dirty shirt. That is certainly part of the law that needs to be challenged. I cannot find any other industry where the government mandates minimum hours of operation, to be available for an inspection of records that might come once a year... 1000 hours for a 1 hour inspection. That is incredibly burdensome.
                        I second that....

                        Comment

                        • GatorB
                          The Demon & 12clicks
                          • Oct 2001
                          • 18208

                          #13
                          The movies are from 1997. I do not know how they can extend the statutes of limitations when someone else out of his controll decides to re-release the content. I'd challenge that shit in court. That's like saying if I were to re-release porn for the 70's I need to have 2257 records. Pure bullshit.

                          Comment

                          Working...