Quote:
Originally Posted by wig
Lost what? Of course you did not comment on PER CAPITA GDP (not GDP), I introduced that. It was to explain why your below contention is misguided and superficial
|
But GDP is NOT what I commented on in your statement
Quote:
|
Your statement is a non-sequitur.
|
It makes perfect sense, level the playing field and business that left to save money will no longer be saving that money
Quote:
Damn, dude. Robert Rubin or Roger Altman?
They are the economists that Hillary had as economic advisers who were quoted in the article YOU posted as stating that her idea of placing a "moratorium on trade agreements -- which would be used to beef up labor and environmental protections and provide more aid for domestic workers displaced by foreign competition" would:
|
OK, forgive me for not knowing the names of the the Secretary of States Economic advisers, considering they still don;t know where they got all there money when Bill was making 35k a year as a governor
Quote:
Now, I know you already slipped in the canard about their stakes in overseas markets, so I'm sure you'll be quick to try and dismiss these gentlemen as evil jewish bankers.
Beat your strawmen all you want, but you'd be better served with an economics 101 book.
|
I flew in a canard once, over the desert just east of LA, is that what you're talking about? It was built in my buddies garage and scared the hell out of me, I went back the next weekend and did it again!
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that