On another note. When a program closes and the program owners stop paying out to affiliates. Would you allow that same person to use another NATS License to open another program?
That would depend on the circumstances of the program closing, etc. It's not a question that can just be answered with a simple yes or no.
As an example, a piece of shit like JJ, never in a million years would I allow him to.
he's been outed as a scammer for quite some time now.
A number of reasons, none of which will likely result in any positive discussion here as people have their opinions which they post anonymously and won't sway from no matter what is explained or shown to them.
Personally, for myself, it was something I was on the fence about and it wasn't easy. He's certainly a person who if I ever have the displeasure of meeting will be told exactly how I feel about him and it won't be a pleasant conversation for him.
Shaving is so 2000.
Nowadays it's close affiliate accounts, keep their money and then sell off the company once you squeezed every last dime out of it
“If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.”
-- Ulysses S. Grant
I don't use NATS and therefore don't have a dog in this fight (which is why I should not have posted at all, sorry NATS!). But many fine programs use NATS so I'm assuming any word of 'shaving', even from a fine hard-to-understand individual like Teencat, can be annoying (and harmful to business).
But as to the other points about allowing this scumbag or that scammer to use NATS again: people are clever, especially the douschebags who cause trouble of the world. So setting up a new NATS license, or a new Epoch or CCBill or Verotel account, would be easy if you knew what you were doing. I mean, one assumes. LOL I have no idea how to do such things, I'm too busy actually working.
A number of reasons, none of which will likely result in any positive discussion here as people have their opinions which they post anonymously and won't sway from no matter what is explained or shown to them.
Personally, for myself, it was something I was on the fence about and it wasn't easy. He's certainly a person who if I ever have the displeasure of meeting will be told exactly how I feel about him and it won't be a pleasant conversation for him.
Comment