View Single Post
Old 01-22-2011, 02:56 PM  
SuckOnThis
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In my head
Posts: 6,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
1. Rupert Murdoch is in BUSINESS...he could care less about "political agendas" he's looking for ratings.

Bullshit.

http://www.businessinsider.com/leake...-point-2010-12

This is going to add some fairly serious grist to the mill for the people that think Fox News is essentially the political arm of the GOP.

During the height of the health care debate a Fox News vice president Bill Sammon sent a memo to staff asking them to refer to the 'public option' as the 'government option.' Media Matters, in a welcome departure from the usual nitpicking, obtained the email which directed the new division to:

Please use the term ?government-run health insurance,? or, when brevity is a concern, ?government option,? whenever possible.?

This memo came shortly after Republican pollster Frank Luntz advised Sean Hannity thusly:

?If you call it a public option, the American people are split,? he explained. ?If you call it the government option, the public is overwhelmingly against it.?

This edict was backed up by Michael Clemente, Fox?s senior vice president for news, who responded to Sammon's email: ?#3 on your list is the preferred way to say it, write it, use it.? He was referring to the longer version: ?The public option, which is the government-run plan.?

Howie Kurtz spoke with Sammon who defended the directive:

Sammon said in an interview that the term "public option" ?is a vague, bland, undescriptive phrase,? and that after all, ?who would be against a public park?? The phrase "government-run plan," he said, is ?a more neutral term,? and was used just last week by a New York Times columnist.

?I have no idea what the Republicans were pushing or not. It?s simply an accurate, fair, objective term.?
SuckOnThis is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote