Quote:
Originally Posted by cam_girls
If you spent 10 years studying copyright law and never heard of fair use, you must have done some selective reading.
The only answer you'll ever believe is YOU THE PHOTOGRAPHER OWN EVERYTHING 100%.
I'm not going to look up case studies, you said look up WIKIPEDIA and it CLEARLY SHOWS FAIR USE APPLIES TO REVIEW SITES.
FFS haven't you ever seen a movie review on TV?
WHAT DID YOU SEE? A commentary on the choice of name for the movie?
NO YOU IDIOT, YOU SEE 5 MINUTES OF BRAD PITT AND MEGAN FOX IN ACTION!
You think 100,000 TV stations around the world paid $X million to Paramount for exemptions to the copyright?
PULL YOUR FAT FINGERS OUT YOUR EARS.
I DON'T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT COPYRIGHT OR NOT, I'M THE TRUMAN, MOST OF THE STORY LINES ARE STOLEN FROM MY LIFE.
BUT I WILL SPEAK UP WHEN THE THREAD GOES LIKE THIS.
WE FILMED IT WE OWN EVERYTHING!
IT'S THE LAW!
IT'S MINE MINE MINE
YOU SUCK YOU FUCKING RETARD
HOW DARE YOU ASK A QUESTION ABOUT COPYRIGHT ON A CAMGIRL SHOW?
 |
You're a fucking idiot. Fair Use, even as you just described, would apply to excerpts of a body of work. Movie reviews on the news show short clips. Review sites do the same. You can't display the entire body of work and claim it's Fair Use. Reviews of books quote small passages, they don't print the entire fucking book. Amazon posts 30 second snippets of songs from a CD, not the entire song/CD.
Additionally, when you do see clips of movies on TV shows, it always says "Courtesy of Paramount" or whatever studio owns the rights to the film. Studios provide the review show with clips to use...the reviews shows don't just make their own copies to use. So, using a full webcam show, recorded/copied by the viewer, is not Fair Use. Unless the cam site provides the "viewer" with copies, they are not Fair Use material.
It's not quantum physics...