Ron Paul Defends WikiLeaks
Collapse
X
-
-
seems like Ron Paul is the only man left with common sense and integrity in DC while everyone else there are blindly busy with their career growth and job securities.Comment
-
Comment
-
it not WL's operation headquarters. thats just a datacenter build in underground nuclear bunker. i don't know who runs it but it also home of the pirate party and the pirate bayComment
-
-
Comment
-
xMarkPro -- Ultimate Blog Network Management
Streamline your marketing operations. Centralize management of domains, pages, Wordpress blogs, sponsors, link codes, media items, sales and traffic statistics, plus more!Comment
-
I wonder why people seem to forget that the root of this leak is based on espionage by an American soldier who shouldn't have had any kind of security clearance. As a kid, he refused to say the pledge of allegiance, and is a known flaming left wing activist.
Both him and Assange have nothing but malicious intent toward the US government. They've also put US soldiers and operatives in danger, and made their jobs much more difficult. Anyone that thinks all nations can just be transparent and operate without secrecy are just showing how naive they are.Last edited by bronco67; 12-10-2010, 10:28 AM.
Comment
-
don't believe the hype.
ron paul is a career politician with the main goal of getting elected, just like every other politician inside the beltway. he's a government official that creates hype via an anti-government message.
nothing more.Comment
-
well, you might feel like that, but Ron Paul has my vote. It's not just hype, he does what he says.Webmaster Coupons Coupons and discounts for hosting, domains, SSL Certs, and more!
AmeriNOC Coupons | Certified Hosting Coupons | Hosting Coupons | Domain Name Coupons
Comment
-
ohhhhhhh so wars based on lies dont put soldiers in danger? and wikileaks does?I wonder why people seem to forget that the root of this leak is based on espionage by an American soldier who shouldn't have had any kind of security clearance. As a kid, he refused to say the pledge of allegiance, and is a known flaming left wing activist.
Both him and Assange have nothing but malicious intent toward the US government. They've also put US soldiers and operatives in danger, and made their jobs much more difficult. Anyone that thinks all nations can just be transparent and operate without secrecy are just showing how naive they are.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Huh? Where are you getting that info?
Paul was the only 2008 Republican presidential candidate to have objected to and voted against the Iraq War Resolution,[16][17] and continues to oppose U.S. presence in Iraq, charging the government with using the War on Terror to curtail civil liberties. He believes a just declaration of war after the September 11, 2001, attacks should have been directed against the actual terrorists, Al-Qaeda, rather than against Iraq, which has not been linked to the attacks.[18] In 2003, Paul said that when America seeks war, it must be sought only to protect citizens, it must be declared by the U.S. Congress
Alex S
Webair Internet Development, Inc.
516.938.4100 Ext. 218
AIM: Webairalexs
Twitter: Webairalex
EMAIL: [email protected]
WEB: http://www.webair.comComment
-
Hm im very undecided how i feel anymore. i dont believe much in secrets. most secrets are not to help people but help the few.
im all for pure openess honestly.Comment
-
When you are the only sane one in Washington you tend to appear to be insane.
Ron Paul 2012. It is time for real change.
Comment
-
Webmaster Coupons Coupons and discounts for hosting, domains, SSL Certs, and more!
AmeriNOC Coupons | Certified Hosting Coupons | Hosting Coupons | Domain Name Coupons
Comment
-
ok, so i was off on the iraq war. nevertheless, my point still stands, he votes along party lines 8 out of 10 votes, that's when he's around to vote.Huh? Where are you getting that info?
Paul was the only 2008 Republican presidential candidate to have objected to and voted against the Iraq War Resolution,[16][17] and continues to oppose U.S. presence in Iraq, charging the government with using the War on Terror to curtail civil liberties. He believes a just declaration of war after the September 11, 2001, attacks should have been directed against the actual terrorists, Al-Qaeda, rather than against Iraq, which has not been linked to the attacks.[18] In 2003, Paul said that when America seeks war, it must be sought only to protect citizens, it must be declared by the U.S. CongressComment
-
i wish i wasn't so jaded and fucked over that i agreed with you.
but i am.no sigComment
-
There's a difference between secrecy and huge blatant lies. I can live fine not knowing every detail of what the government does to protect us, but for them to start an unnecessary war that costs our money and soldiers' lives based on huge lies should never be acceptable to ANYONE.
That said, I'm not entirely sure that Wikileaks has really exposed anything serious that intelligent people didn't already know or assume and would not be surprised if this whole thing does more damage to us all than good, once our father the government starts eliminating our privacy thanks to this.
It's like wow, Al Qaeda is largely backed by Saudi Arabia...no shit? Did we all just forget how many of the 9/11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia? Or Osama Bin Laden's roots?Last edited by PornMD; 12-10-2010, 02:03 PM.Want to crush it in mainstream with Facebook ads? Hit me up.Comment
-
There are 100k pages right? My guess is it will be awhile before we see the juicy stuff come to the top IF the media ever reports it. Plus he has a lot more docs that are going to be released right? I have a feeling the best is yet to come.
Comment
-

You are a riot!
Ron Paul is so principled that he didn't even vote for his own "Audit The Fed" bill (H.R. 1207), because it was lumped into the Finance Reform bill, which he didn't believe in.Last edited by Dcat; 12-10-2010, 02:55 PM.Comment
-
You are so far off on this that you are either intentionally trying to mislead people or simply not paying any attention at all.
Wrong again on both points. He does not toe any party line and he was and is totally against the war in Iraq. Seriously, where do you get your information?
Last edited by Ethersync; 12-11-2010, 07:42 AM.The best ePassporte replacement I have found: OKPAYComment
-
Comment
-
I have no issue with wikileaks.. The info that is being put out in the public has no value to anyone other that it will embarrass a few folks. I have an active TS (SCI) for contract work I still do. Some of the reports from iraq (2004-2005-2006) are some of the very ones I and my team sent up the chain. And trust me when I say they are of no value to anyone not in the loop. I am laughing at all hub bub from people that have no idea what classified info really is..
Comment
-
-
My advice is that whenever the administration picks up the rhetoric on a particular topic, watch out elsewhere because they are going to pick your pocket.
Meese Commission sensationalism diverting the US prosecutors to attack the adult industry while the banks were looting old peoples' savings accounts: Charles Keating and Lincoln Savings etc.
People hauling $50+ million in cash in travel bags in a single trip out of Afghanistan; and, we are dumb enough not to know why nothing is getting accomplished while we pay out billions of dollars.
Ron Paul has it right.....sorry folks.Comment
-
-
It seems everyone is basing their opinions on wikileaks by what secrets or deals the governments are keeping that would embarrass them.
I don't look at it that way
I worry about the average soldier that has some equipment or some movement that is detailed is compromised with all this. That private that gave out the secrets, he should be put to death, thats an oath you take in the military, if he didn't like, too fucking bad. And the guy that spread it all over the place, I don't care if lives or dies either.
If this shit would have happened on a different presidents watch, heads would have rolled, but our president is a pussy, he's already probably apologizing to other countries for itCarbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about thatComment
-
Call Ron what you will, I believe the man, when I saw him debate with all the other republican candidates back in this past race I though I was dreaming. He said things to a national audience that had never been uttered from a republican running for office. To this day I watch that and feel inspired,(seeing Guliani's smirking face is enough) if there can be a little glimmer of hope in this insane goverment I believe its his courage.
Alex S
Webair Internet Development, Inc.
516.938.4100 Ext. 218
AIM: Webairalexs
Twitter: Webairalex
EMAIL: [email protected]
WEB: http://www.webair.comComment






Comment