Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Dane
Ok, I better watch out for gays suing me because I do not allow gay content submission on my female tgp/tube.
Jesus.... |
oh right i forgot Gays are the first and only minority.
oh and wait gay people would never choose to make money or be able to comment about straight porn either.
for example i could splice together matt bixel AKA Danny Rhymes into a fake threesome, compare and contrast it to one of his real threesome scenes, to comment on/bring attention to the anti -gay mentality of the female porn stars
Quote:
|
Recently, he has retired from doing gay porn, other than solo work, citing females lack of desire to work with him afterwards as the reason
|
i realize the idiot who you hire as a lawyer might be too clueless to see how i could portray that removal as a "deliberate attempt to censor the commentary about a clearly anti-gay policy within the porn industry" but my lawyers are actually competent.
The fact is even with your deliberately scope limited view, i can produce a liable situation proves how wrong you are. BTW that another time you have just been proven wrong.
Add in race (of the submitter not the content) and you would have tons of potential liablities from "taking down content for any reason"
btw i notice you dodged the question
if i you truely believed that TOS should supercede the DMCA, why hasn't a single torrent or tube site simple put in their TOS that by using their site to view content you claim is your copyright you agree to put all your content in the public domain.
IF you can TOS can force conditions dam your legal liabilites, why couldn't a tube site simple force you to put your content into the public domain, if you filled out a valid take down request against them.
It would totally end the problem, because the only way you could keep your content out of the public domain is to not file a takedown request for any content.
basically get the full benefit of the safe harbor, and no work taking shit down.