Wikipedia is not up to date!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sly
    Let's do some business!
    • Sep 2004
    • 31377

    #1

    Wikipedia is not up to date!

    I don't think I've ever checked Wikipedia and see a very recent event not covered. I have looked at several politicians from last nights election and have yet to find one that is properly updated with results.

    What on earth is this world coming to?
    Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted

    Windows VPS now available
    Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.
    Click here for more details.
  • Cyber Fucker
    Hmm
    • Sep 2005
    • 12642

    #2
    Not only not up to date but there is a lot of miss information at Wikipedia as well.

    Comment

    • d-null
      . . .
      • Apr 2007
      • 13724

      #3
      it is all user contributed and updated, if you had the information you should have contributed by updating those

      __________________

      Looking for a custom TUBE SCRIPT that supports massive traffic, load balancing, billing support, and h264 encoding? Hit up Konrad!
      Looking for designs for your websites or custom tubesite design? Hit up Zuzana Designs
      Check out the #1 WordPress SEO Plugin: CyberSEO Suite

      Comment

      • Sly
        Let's do some business!
        • Sep 2004
        • 31377

        #4
        Originally posted by d-null
        it is all user contributed and updated, if you had the information you should have contributed by updating those
        No way. I prefer to complain loudly than to improve society by spreading my wealth of knowledge.
        Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted

        Windows VPS now available
        Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.
        Click here for more details.

        Comment

        • Cyber Fucker
          Hmm
          • Sep 2005
          • 12642

          #5
          I think that Wiki was much better in the past, with more reliable information. I edited it once to correct a wrong information but my correction was canceled very soon after that. I guess that sysops and mods know better.

          Fucking pathetic

          Comment

          • woj
            <&(©¿©)&>
            • Jul 2002
            • 47880

            #6
            yea, fuck it, I'm canceling my membership and getting a real encyclopedia instead
            Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000
            Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager
            Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager

            Comment

            • epitome
              So Fucking Lame
              • Jun 2009
              • 12156

              #7
              I think a lot of people became disenfranchised with the elitist editors there. I still do not understand why they do not think my porn sites are reputable sources. All I want is a tiny link in the footer. Is that too much to ask for?

              Comment

              • Lilit
                Confirmed User
                • Mar 2007
                • 1645

                #8
                Originally posted by Sly
                No way. I prefer to complain loudly
                I know this
                Nadya-EuroRevenue
                ICQ: 400525519 nadya[at]eurorevenue[dot]com
                Skype: nadyay7
                *See who I am at AdultWhosWho*

                Comment

                Working...