LittleLupe.com

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
    Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn
    • Jul 2004
    • 38323

    #201
    Originally posted by StinkyFingerz
    Whats that a girl with a stuffed unicorn on her ass with a bedspread with hearts and shit on it?



    VERY young looking boy with a young looking girl in a pool.



    Amazing the hypocrisy...
    You are a real piece of work, equating my site with Little Lupe.

    Only one of the photos of those you posted did I shoot. The one with Ariel, one of my spokesmodels, and the unicorn.

    If you looked at it in context, you would see that it is a Valentines photo set in which she received a rose, a box of chocolates, and a stuffed unicorn. Nowhere was it implied that she was under 18. Only your mind sees that, since that is apparently what excites you and you go looking for.

    Ariel appears in dozens of photo sets and videos on my site and she is never portrayed as underage. She recently graduated from college with a degree in computer science.

    The young "boy"? His name is Peter North. You may have heard of him. The ID for the woman in that picture indicates she was in her mid-twenties when it was shot and she certainly looks it. She is not wearing pigtails or in any way suggesting she is under 18 in that "softcore" photo set.

    I could go on, but I won't since you are apparently oblivious as to what constitutes a site that obviously panders to pedos, and one which caters to adults.

    I have no problem with adult role-playing. However when the sole focus of a site appears to be pandering to those with an interest in underage girls, then I have a problem with it.

    As a father, I would expect you might at least have some reservations, but I guess not.

    Is shooting porn in Tennessee even legal?

    ADG Webmaster
    Last edited by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude; 04-24-2007, 11:30 PM.
    Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos



    Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

    Comment

    • stickyfingerz
      Doin fine
      • Oct 2005
      • 24984

      #202
      Originally posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
      Whats that a girl with a stuffed unicorn on her ass with a bedspread with hearts and shit on it?



      A very young looking girl in a school girl uniform?

      VERY young looking boy with a young looking girl in a pool.



      Amazing the hypocrisy...

      You are a real piece of work, equating my site with Little Lupe.

      Only one of the photos of those you posted did I shoot. The one with Ariel, one of my spokesmodels, and the unicorn.

      If you looked at it in context, you would see that it is a Valentines photo set in which she received a rose, a box of chocolates, and a stuffed unicorn. Nowhere was it implied that she was under 18. Only your mind sees that, since that is apparently what excites you and you go looking for.

      Ariel appears in dozens of photo sets and videos on my site and she is never portrayed as underage. She recently graduated from college with a degree in computer science.

      The young "boy"? His name is Peter North. You may have heard of him. The ID for the woman in that picture indicates she was in her mid-twenties when it was shot and she certainly looks it. She is not wearing pigtails or in any way suggesting she is under 18 in that "softcore" photo set.

      I could go on, but I won't since you are apparently oblivious as to what constitutes a site that obviously panders to pedos, and one which caters to adults.

      I have no problem with adult role-playing. However when the sole focus of a site appears to be pandering to those with an interest in underage girls, then I have a problem with it.

      As a father, I would expect you might at least have some reservations, but I guess not.

      Is shooting porn in Tennessee even legal?

      ADG Webmaster
      All context isnt it? You also accusing me of having ill intentions towards my kids?
      Last edited by stickyfingerz; 04-24-2007, 11:31 PM.

      Comment

      • stickyfingerz
        Doin fine
        • Oct 2005
        • 24984

        #203
        School girl uniform and pigtails on a young looking Asian girl.. What fantasy does that pander to??

        Comment

        • cones
          So Fucking Banned
          • Feb 2007
          • 571

          #204
          she looks HOT!

          Comment

          • aico
            Moo Moo Cow
            • Mar 2004
            • 14748

            #205
            Originally posted by stickyfingerz
            School girl uniform and pigtails on a young looking Asian girl.. What fantasy does that pander to??

            LOL You tell us, you're the one who said you make your wife do it... fucking idiot.

            Comment

            • stickyfingerz
              Doin fine
              • Oct 2005
              • 24984

              #206
              Originally posted by aico
              LOL You tell us, you're the one who said you make your wife do it... fucking idiot.
              Im not the one putting fantasy and role playing down, they are. Im pointing out hypocrisy. Funny you used the word "making" too. Are we now insinuating that Im forcing my wife to do things?

              Comment

              • AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
                Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn
                • Jul 2004
                • 38323

                #207
                Originally posted by stickyfingerz
                School girl uniform and pigtails on a young looking Asian girl.. What fantasy does that pander to??

                Apparently yours...

                The model was nearly 30 in that photo, and already had a kid (note the hips - it is more apparent in other photos) - the outfit was hers, and her idea. I never implied that she was under 18.

                She has a tat and implants. Besides, she never shows more than her fake boobies.

                And you equate that with Little Lupe? Are you really so stupid?!?

                Since you want to argue, just what are the laws for shooting porn in Tennesse?

                Idiot!!!

                ADG Webmaster
                Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos



                Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

                Comment

                • aico
                  Moo Moo Cow
                  • Mar 2004
                  • 14748

                  #208
                  Originally posted by stickyfingerz
                  Im not the one putting fantasy and role playing down, they are. Im pointing out hypocrisy. Funny you used the word "making" too. Are we now insinuating that Im forcing my wife to do things?
                  Yes, I am.

                  Comment

                  • Webby
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Oct 2002
                    • 14956

                    #209
                    Originally posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
                    You are a real piece of work, equating my site with Little Lupe.
                    Won't address the idiot - he's just too ignorant, clueless and clutching at straws and little to do with the "adult entertainment industry".

                    Originally posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
                    I have no problem with adult role-playing. However when the sole focus of a site appears to be pandering to those with an interest in underage girls, then I have a problem with it.
                    Totally agree with this!! When you look at the whole "package" as any jury would do, - and if there is only one sole purpose to that package, in this case to basically market to pedos - it is very hard to defend this.

                    It's clear why this is done by design - satisfying the fantasies of pedos is a huge market and the people involved also know this from their "success rate". All they care about is money - if dog fucking was legal (hell knows if it is in whatever countries) - it is poss they would purvey that. Bottom line - there is no judgement in publishing - it's clouded by dollar signs.

                    This "content" is illegal in a fair number of countries - would love to see a few asses in courtrooms trying to defend it in these countries. It may clean up the mainstream adult industry for a few years
                    XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                    Comment

                    • EBORG9
                      Confirmed User
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 1823

                      #210
                      I had to step out for a couple of days...what round is it?

                      Comment

                      • SomeCreep
                        :glugglug
                        • Mar 2003
                        • 26118

                        #211
                        Little Lupe for president!

                        Webair Hosting

                        I use and recommend Webair for hosting.

                        Comment

                        • stickyfingerz
                          Doin fine
                          • Oct 2005
                          • 24984

                          #212
                          Originally posted by Webby
                          Won't address the idiot - he's just too ignorant, clueless and clutching at straws and little to do with the "adult entertainment industry".



                          Totally agree with this!! When you look at the whole "package" as any jury would do, - and if there is only one sole purpose to that package, in this case to basically market to pedos - it is very hard to defend this.

                          It's clear why this is done by design - satisfying the fantasies of pedos is a huge market and the people involved also know this from their "success rate". All they care about is money - if dog fucking was legal (hell knows if it is in whatever countries) - it is poss they would purvey that. Bottom line - there is no judgement in publishing - it's clouded by dollar signs.

                          This "content" is illegal in a fair number of countries - would love to see a few asses in courtrooms trying to defend it in these countries. It may clean up the mainstream adult industry for a few years

                          You continue to avoid talking about the quickbuck site. Why is that? Girls in pigtails on FUCKING SCHOOL BUSES. That seems to be outsider your blinders huh? Girls that ride school buses are nearly ALWAYS under 18, and normally are 16 or under. Yet you ignore that. Fucking fat cunt.

                          Comment

                          • Webby
                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                            • Oct 2002
                            • 14956

                            #213
                            Originally posted by EBORG9
                            I had to step out for a couple of days...what round is it?
                            Sticky's lobotomy was a complete success and he's now rambling about every subject on the planet and trying hard to fantasize about what people have said
                            XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                            Comment

                            • V_RocKs
                              Damn Right I Kiss Ass!
                              • Nov 2003
                              • 32451

                              #214
                              She has made me a lot of money.

                              Comment

                              • AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
                                Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn
                                • Jul 2004
                                • 38323

                                #215
                                Here is another photo of Sarah from my public area. Certainly doesn't look under 18 to me:



                                She doesn't quite look under 18 to me in this set either:



                                BTW, you didn't answer what the law is for shooting porn in Tennessee?

                                ADG Webmaster
                                Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos



                                Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

                                Comment

                                • V_RocKs
                                  Damn Right I Kiss Ass!
                                  • Nov 2003
                                  • 32451

                                  #216
                                  Originally posted by stickyfingerz
                                  You continue to avoid talking about the quickbuck site. Why is that? Girls in pigtails on FUCKING SCHOOL BUSES. That seems to be outsider your blinders huh? Girls that ride school buses are nearly ALWAYS under 18, and normally are 16 or under. Yet you ignore that. Fucking fat cunt.
                                  Quick Buck? You Mean, Implied Bestiality, and how old are most Babysitters?

                                  Comment

                                  • AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
                                    Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn
                                    • Jul 2004
                                    • 38323

                                    #217
                                    Originally posted by V_RocKs
                                    Quick Buck? You Mean, Implied Bestiality, and how old are most Babysitters?
                                    See you got NATS link codes on your links.

                                    ADG Webmaster
                                    Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos



                                    Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

                                    Comment

                                    • Webby
                                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                                      • Oct 2002
                                      • 14956

                                      #218
                                      Originally posted by V_RocKs
                                      She has made me a lot of money.
                                      Sure... got that from the previous thread relating to this website - you posted enough times

                                      She is prob a reasonable model and prob do well for many years ahead yet - and good luck to the girl.

                                      If people want to portray imagery of a 12 year old kid being fucked to satisfy sicko pedo fantasies - carry on - it's all about earning a dime
                                      XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                                      Comment

                                      • zibril
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Feb 2007
                                        • 731

                                        #219
                                        she's cute, promote her....

                                        Comment

                                        • NTSS
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Mar 2005
                                          • 5688

                                          #220
                                          The moral of the story is...people that live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones

                                          Way to go stickyfingerz

                                          Lots of major sponsors, in one form or another, do the same shit that TR is doing... IE: Lollypops, pigtails, teddybears, colorful clothing, bedding, funiture...etc

                                          So what makes Little Lupe any different?

                                          Also, I don't think these sites are what pedos are looking for...they know how to find the real sick shit online.

                                          So drop it
                                          ICQ: 150-803-430
                                          Email: marketing7(at)cox(dot)net

                                          Comment

                                          • BVF
                                            Black Vagina Finder
                                            • Jan 2002
                                            • 13975

                                            #221
                                            Originally posted by Webby
                                            As an alleged adult of 30 something years of age, and a father of, soon to be three children, - are you comfortable with boasting about 1:68 conversions to websites which convert on the basis of imaging of a model styled up to look around 12 years of age with pigtails, teddy bears, hairclips and coloring pens and a cock stuck in her mouth??
                                            What you say might be valid, but you're just pulling the number 12 out of your ass....

                                            Black Pussy
                                            Click On Mr Cosby..CCbill, 60/40, 136 FHG's....The Cos Loves Black Ghetto Pussy!!

                                            Comment

                                            • stickyfingerz
                                              Doin fine
                                              • Oct 2005
                                              • 24984

                                              #222
                                              Originally posted by NTSS
                                              The moral of the story is...people that live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones

                                              Way to go stickyfingerz

                                              Lots of major sponsors, in one form or another, do the same shit that TR is doing... IE: Lollypops, pigtails, teddybears, colorful clothing, bedding, funiture...etc

                                              So what makes Little Lupe any different?

                                              Also, I don't think these sites are what pedos are looking for...they know how to find the real sick shit online.

                                              So drop it
                                              Exactly. All the ones crying about imagery either have it in their own sites to some extent, or they ignore it when its in one of their "buddies" sites. The moral is its all interpretation. And you are dead on saying people with a real obsession with underage porn are not looking at little Lupes site.

                                              Same people that call weed a gateway drug. lol

                                              Comment

                                              • NikKay
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • Aug 2001
                                                • 1642

                                                #223
                                                So who IS looking at this site, if not those with fantasies of much younger girls? I have a very appreciative eye for the womanly form and like the (PIC) posts as much as anyone else; yet I find nothing at all entertaining or sexually enticing about LL. I wouldn't feel very good about myself if I did, especially considering that I have a 12-year-old daughter. What is particularly telling is the striking difference between the photos of this model on the LL site as compared to the previously posted Spanish website featuring the same model.

                                                And I also feel this was a very important post yet was mostly ignored by those making their arguments:

                                                US Code Title 18 Chapter 110 section 2256 - Definitions for chapter

                                                paragraph 8:

                                                (8) “child pornography” means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where—

                                                .................

                                                (B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or

                                                paragraph 11:

                                                (11) the term “indistinguishable” used with respect to a depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. This definition does not apply to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting minors or adults.

                                                Comment

                                                • Goodings Media
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Apr 2007
                                                  • 1987

                                                  #224
                                                  i try to avoid her. shes pretty cute and obviously does well, but shes a bit too kid looking n Im not sure i want to attract that kinda traffic.

                                                  my personal preference
                                                  ICQ: 446-568-913 Email: liam||goodingsmedia.com msn: [email protected]

                                                  Comment

                                                  • webmasterchecks
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Oct 2006
                                                    • 1685

                                                    #225
                                                    stickyfingers and webby sure have a lot of time on their hands to throw around childish insults.

                                                    sticky, remember that this thread is about littlelupe, not arlos sites. if there was a thread accusing hooper of presenting what looks to be underage content on one of his sites, the thread would be dead, because he is not doing anything the other 80% of people are not doing, its become the norm. i am not suggesting hooper is clean, just that he is dirty in his own, different way

                                                    when littlelupe.com came out, first glance at it and i knew it was triplexcash, only company i know that has the balls to put nursery rhythms on their 'teen' porn site tour.

                                                    lots of people bitching about how she looks underage, but they are putting their links up. have you seen a site go near the top 1000 in alexa within a week? freeones was on here bragging about that accomplishment a few months ago and it took them 10 years to make it

                                                    Webmasterchecks Affiliate Payments - fully compatible with nats/mpa3

                                                    Comment

                                                    • stickyfingerz
                                                      Doin fine
                                                      • Oct 2005
                                                      • 24984

                                                      #226
                                                      Originally posted by webmasterchecks
                                                      stickyfingers and webby sure have a lot of time on their hands to throw around childish insults.

                                                      sticky, remember that this thread is about littlelupe, not arlos sites. if there was a thread accusing hooper of presenting what looks to be underage content on one of his sites, the thread would be dead, because he is not doing anything the other 80% of people are not doing, its become the norm. i am not suggesting hooper is clean, just that he is dirty in his own, different way

                                                      when littlelupe.com came out, first glance at it and i knew it was triplexcash, only company i know that has the balls to put nursery rhythms on their 'teen' porn site tour.

                                                      lots of people bitching about how she looks underage, but they are putting their links up. have you seen a site go near the top 1000 in alexa within a week? freeones was on here bragging about that accomplishment a few months ago and it took them 10 years to make it

                                                      Just to make it clear. I am not bugged by any quickbucks sites. He came in the thread ripping on Lupe, while having sites that use the same imagery.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • webmasterchecks
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • Oct 2006
                                                        • 1685

                                                        #227
                                                        Originally posted by stickyfingerz
                                                        Just to make it clear. I am not bugged by any quickbucks sites. He came in the thread ripping on Lupe, while having sites that use the same imagery.
                                                        dude, your not kidding anyone here with this. it takes a lot of searching to find an over-18 model that looks that young and that company consistently comes out with sites that have the youngest looking models out there. on purpose.

                                                        and people bitch about it, but some of them secretly wish they had her, because of the traffic, young sells, alexa speaks for itself, paulo does not need to promote the site, it promotes itself.

                                                        they are getting flack for it, and they should, but they understand thats the cost of getting mass sales. thats just how it is, dont go against the grain
                                                        Webmasterchecks Affiliate Payments - fully compatible with nats/mpa3

                                                        Comment

                                                        • AaronM
                                                          GFY Royality ;)
                                                          • Oct 2001
                                                          • 46917

                                                          #228
                                                          Originally posted by webmasterchecks
                                                          dude, your not kidding anyone here with this. it takes a lot of searching to find an over-18 model that looks that young and that company consistently comes out with sites that have the youngest looking models out there. on purpose.

                                                          and people bitch about it, but some of them secretly wish they had her, because of the traffic, young sells, alexa speaks for itself, paulo does not need to promote the site, it promotes itself.

                                                          they are getting flack for it, and they should, but they understand thats the cost of getting mass sales. thats just how it is, dont go against the grain

                                                          Yep.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE
                                                            North Coast Pimp
                                                            • Dec 2005
                                                            • 9395

                                                            #229
                                                            Did you guys really stay up all night argueing about this...?






                                                            Originally posted by stickyfingerz
                                                            Ok Jon, since you jumped back in. Would you promote that School Bus girl site, but not Little Lupe? Can you say the qb one isnt based on the same imagery little Webby is crying about?
                                                            I don't promote teen anything

                                                            Comment

                                                            • stickyfingerz
                                                              Doin fine
                                                              • Oct 2005
                                                              • 24984

                                                              #230
                                                              Originally posted by Jon Clark
                                                              Did you guys really stay up all night argueing about this...?








                                                              I don't promote teen anything
                                                              Cop out.

                                                              Comment

                                                              • aico
                                                                Moo Moo Cow
                                                                • Mar 2004
                                                                • 14748

                                                                #231

                                                                Comment

                                                                • Webby
                                                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                  • Oct 2002
                                                                  • 14956

                                                                  #232
                                                                  Still going on??

                                                                  This thread is too brain dead thanks to Daddy of the Year's lobotomy, but was fun

                                                                  Dammit - screw this "adult entertainment" biz everyone needs to dump all adult sponsors and switch over to purveying images of little girls being fucked and pandering to sicko pedo fantasies - the "pedo entertainment" biz is much more profitable

                                                                  Pity there is hardly more than a few valid posts (mainly from real webmasters) of any substance out of the whole of this thread - and not one who stood up and offered any legitimate defense of the site (apart from "it's legal" bullshit - it's not).



                                                                  BVF:

                                                                  What you say might be valid, but you're just pulling the number 12 out of your ass....
                                                                  Sure.. this is correct BVF - it was random - the "portrayal" could be.... anthing from 11 thru to what? Pushing 15?


                                                                  AaronM:

                                                                  Yep.
                                                                  You are very quiet my man


                                                                  Another valid point...

                                                                  NikKay:

                                                                  So who IS looking at this site, if not those with fantasies of much younger girls? I have a very appreciative eye for the womanly form and like the (PIC) posts as much as anyone else; yet I find nothing at all entertaining or sexually enticing about LL. I wouldn't feel very good about myself if I did, especially considering that I have a 12-year-old daughter. What is particularly telling is the striking difference between the photos of this model on the LL site as compared to the previously posted Spanish website featuring the same model.
                                                                  You have mentioned the law in your post NikKay and this is relevant - not just in respect of US law, but elsewhere. To the north of you in Canada, "little girl fucking" is covered by the Child Protection Act where the portrayal of models to appear underage and involved in sexual scenarios is a criminal offense - same in a many other countries. It's considered to be pedo content already.

                                                                  Basically agree with your comment above - any youngish model can look underage in a few random shots. This is clearly not a "few random shots", - the girl is styled to look as young as possible for the shoot and "decorated" with kiddy toys etc - all with one aim which is already more than clear.

                                                                  My main "gripe" is firstly of pedo-pandering to human trash. Until a few years back, was kinda naive to this area until I got an "education" into the world of pedos and their victims from law. In the process met a number of victims and .. sheesh.. will never forget, but don't want to discuss here. Many pedo's themselves are victims who were abused and them proceed to abusing others - and some are just downright "evil" and have little thought to killing their victims.

                                                                  Second "gripe" is this supposed to be the "main stream adult industry" - WTF Since when did "adult entertainment" involve portraying kids on imagery and pandering to the world's human waste??

                                                                  Only my , but don't consider there is much difference between actual CP and the producing CP fantasies and claiming these are legal (which is actually untrue anyway) - all of them just crawled out of the same swamp

                                                                  There are many ways of skinning a cat - and look forward to seeing this type of alleged "content" being hit - time and again
                                                                  Last edited by Webby; 04-25-2007, 01:37 PM.
                                                                  XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE
                                                                    North Coast Pimp
                                                                    • Dec 2005
                                                                    • 9395

                                                                    #233
                                                                    Originally posted by stickyfingerz
                                                                    Cop out.
                                                                    Cop out of what... Cause I don't choose to push the most saturated niche there is?

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • stickyfingerz
                                                                      Doin fine
                                                                      • Oct 2005
                                                                      • 24984

                                                                      #234
                                                                      Originally posted by Webby
                                                                      Still going on??

                                                                      This thread is too brain dead thanks to Daddy of the Year's lobotomy, but was fun

                                                                      Dammit - screw this "adult entertainment" biz everyone needs to dump all adult sponsors and switch over to purveying images of little girls being fucked and pandering to sicko pedo fantasies - the "pedo entertainment" biz is much more profitable

                                                                      Pity there is hardly more than a few valid posts (mainly from real webmasters) of any substance out of the whole of this thread - and not one who stood up and offered any legitimate defense of the site (apart from "it's legal" bullshit - it's not).



                                                                      BVF:



                                                                      Sure.. this is correct BVF - it was random - the "portrayal" could be.... anthing from 11 thru to what? Pushing 15?


                                                                      AaronM:



                                                                      You are very quiet my man


                                                                      Another valid point...

                                                                      NikKay:



                                                                      You have mentioned the law in your post NikKay and this is relevant - not just in respect of US law, but elsewhere. To the north of you in Canada, "little girl fucking" is covered by the Child Protection Act where the portrayal of models to appear underage and involved in sexual scenarios is a criminal offense - same in a many other countries. It's considered to be pedo content already.

                                                                      Basically agree with your comment above - any youngish model can look underage in a few random shots. This is clearly not a "few random shots", - the girl is styled to look as young as possible for the shoot and "decorated" with kiddy toys etc - all with one aim which is already more than clear.

                                                                      My main "gripe" is firstly of pedo-pandering to human trash. Until a few years back, was kinda naive to this area until I got an "education" into the world of pedos and their victims from law. In the process met a number of victims and .. sheesh.. will never forget, but don't want to discuss here. Many pedo's themselves are victims who were abused and them proceed to abusing others - and some are just downright "evil" and have little thought to killing their victims.

                                                                      Second "gripe" is this supposed to be the "main stream adult industry" - WTF Since when did "adult entertainment" involve portraying kids on imagery and pandering to the world's human waste??

                                                                      Only my , but don't consider there is much difference between actual CP and the producing CP fantasies and claiming these are legal (which is actually untrue anyway) - all of them just crawled out of the same swamp

                                                                      There are many ways of skinning a cat - and look forward to seeing this type of alleged "content" being hit - time and again
                                                                      Still no comment on the quickbuck site huh? Just more of accusing people of pandering to pedos. The main difference being. This girl doesnt imo look anywhere near 12. She is actually 20 years old. So what if she was wearing an adult diaper? Would people think she was an infant? Its fantasy. LEGAL fantasy.

                                                                      You will continue to avoid commenting on the quickbuck site, and continue being a hypocrite. And stop calling it CP it is not. CP involves a CHILD that girl is an adult.

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • AaronM
                                                                        GFY Royality ;)
                                                                        • Oct 2001
                                                                        • 46917

                                                                        #235
                                                                        Originally posted by Webby
                                                                        AaronM:



                                                                        You are very quiet my man

                                                                        I don't have much to say. I think both of you could be using this time to make money rather than argue about a topic that has been beat to death already. Seems kinda counter productive to me.

                                                                        If you don't think it's moral or legal then don't promote it. If you're OK with it then go on and make your money.

                                                                        What else needs to be said?

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE
                                                                          North Coast Pimp
                                                                          • Dec 2005
                                                                          • 9395

                                                                          #236
                                                                          Originally posted by AaronM
                                                                          I think both of you could be using this time to make money rather than argue about a topic that has been beat to death already. Seems kinda counter productive to me.

                                                                          If you don't think it's moral or legal then don't promote it. If you're OK with it then go on and make your money.

                                                                          What else needs to be said?
                                                                          The most sensable post in this thread so far...


                                                                          But if you don't agree feel free to keep going, I am getting a good laugh everytime I check back...

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • Webby
                                                                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                            • Oct 2002
                                                                            • 14956

                                                                            #237
                                                                            Originally posted by AaronM
                                                                            If you don't think it's moral or legal then don't promote it. If you're OK with it then go on and make your money.
                                                                            I just thought for one moment ya may have something to say - but, no problemo

                                                                            Sure.. agree Aaron - it's up to each to decide. I'll stick with the common-sense and "legal" side of the "adult entertainment industry" and leave the "pedo fantasy purveying industry" to others more desperate for a dime
                                                                            XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • xlogger
                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                              • Jul 2004
                                                                              • 9507

                                                                              #238
                                                                              hahaha give me a break! All the people that don't like the site has already rubbed one out to her.

                                                                              ----------
                                                                              XLOGGER [REFLECTED] [OH]

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • sarettah
                                                                                see you later, I'm gone
                                                                                • Oct 2002
                                                                                • 14356

                                                                                #239
                                                                                Originally posted by Jon Clark
                                                                                The most sensable post in this thread so far...
                                                                                Now wait just a minute there. I think I said basically the same thing back on page 2
                                                                                All cookies cleared!

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • sarettah
                                                                                  see you later, I'm gone
                                                                                  • Oct 2002
                                                                                  • 14356

                                                                                  #240
                                                                                  Originally posted by stickyfingerz
                                                                                  CP involves a CHILD that girl is an adult.
                                                                                  As has been posted twice in this thread, 2256 (which are the definitions used throughout all the US cp statutes) says otherwise.

                                                                                  .
                                                                                  All cookies cleared!

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE
                                                                                    North Coast Pimp
                                                                                    • Dec 2005
                                                                                    • 9395

                                                                                    #241
                                                                                    Originally posted by sarettah
                                                                                    Now wait just a minute there. I think I said basically the same thing back on page 2
                                                                                    Sorry, I missed it...

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • sarettah
                                                                                      see you later, I'm gone
                                                                                      • Oct 2002
                                                                                      • 14356

                                                                                      #242
                                                                                      Originally posted by Jon Clark
                                                                                      Sorry, I missed it...
                                                                                      np...lololol.
                                                                                      All cookies cleared!

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • AaronM
                                                                                        GFY Royality ;)
                                                                                        • Oct 2001
                                                                                        • 46917

                                                                                        #243
                                                                                        Originally posted by sarettah
                                                                                        As has been posted twice in this thread, 2256 (which are the definitions used throughout all the US cp statutes) says otherwise.

                                                                                        .


                                                                                        That's nice.

                                                                                        The content was shot in a European country for a European company.

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • Webby
                                                                                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                          • Oct 2002
                                                                                          • 14956

                                                                                          #244
                                                                                          Originally posted by sarettah
                                                                                          As has been posted twice in this thread, 2256 (which are the definitions used throughout all the US cp statutes) says otherwise.
                                                                                          .
                                                                                          Ah.. yes, that other "assumption" Life seems to being and end with 2257 *g*

                                                                                          Not familiar with US law and checked with a more qualified source earlier and appears there are about three sections of Civil Code which would possibly be applicable in this instance plus kinda unrelated stuff re the operators.
                                                                                          XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • webmasterchecks
                                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                                            • Oct 2006
                                                                                            • 1685

                                                                                            #245
                                                                                            Originally posted by AaronM
                                                                                            That's nice.

                                                                                            The content was shot in a European country for a European company.
                                                                                            on the flip side to that, that content is being sold in the US and the owners reside in the US
                                                                                            Webmasterchecks Affiliate Payments - fully compatible with nats/mpa3

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • webmasterchecks
                                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                                              • Oct 2006
                                                                                              • 1685

                                                                                              #246
                                                                                              not that im suggesting that its likely they will want to inspect them, but i would say that if you want to be as safe as you can, you would block all US ips, but its possible that may affect sales
                                                                                              Webmasterchecks Affiliate Payments - fully compatible with nats/mpa3

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • AaronM
                                                                                                GFY Royality ;)
                                                                                                • Oct 2001
                                                                                                • 46917

                                                                                                #247
                                                                                                Originally posted by webmasterchecks
                                                                                                on the flip side to that, that content is being sold in the US and the owners reside in the US

                                                                                                Really?

                                                                                                I was under the impression that the content was being distributed worldwide on the Internet. Lets see the documentation you have that shows where the owners live. I'd love to see it. OR are you making assumptions and talking out your ass?

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • webmasterchecks
                                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                                  • Oct 2006
                                                                                                  • 1685

                                                                                                  #248
                                                                                                  Originally posted by AaronM
                                                                                                  Really?

                                                                                                  I was under the impression that the content was being distributed worldwide on the Internet. Lets see the documentation you have that shows where the owners live. I'd love to see it. OR are you making assumptions and talking out your ass?
                                                                                                  am i making assumptions about the owners living in the US? Absolutely

                                                                                                  but id bet they do and hooper mentioned they did earlier in the thread and you didnt say anything then

                                                                                                  and i believe that the govt can go after you if they can show that your distributing the content in the US, although i think most will say the probability of that is pretty small
                                                                                                  Webmasterchecks Affiliate Payments - fully compatible with nats/mpa3

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • AaronM
                                                                                                    GFY Royality ;)
                                                                                                    • Oct 2001
                                                                                                    • 46917

                                                                                                    #249
                                                                                                    Originally posted by webmasterchecks
                                                                                                    am i making assumptions about the owners living in the US? Absolutely

                                                                                                    but id bet they do and hooper mentioned they did earlier in the thread and you didnt say anything then

                                                                                                    and i believe that the govt can go after you if they can show that your distributing the content in the US, although i think most will say the probability of that is pretty small


                                                                                                    Do you honestly think I've read this entire lame ass thread?

                                                                                                    1: You should not make assumptions without facts.

                                                                                                    2: You should not believe everything you read.

                                                                                                    I have no issue with Hooper. In fact, it's fair to say that I like him. But that doesn't mean that everything he says is gospel.

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    • Pornwolf
                                                                                                      Drunk and Unruly
                                                                                                      • Jan 2002
                                                                                                      • 22712

                                                                                                      #250
                                                                                                      Originally posted by stickyfingerz
                                                                                                      School girl uniform and pigtails on a young looking Asian girl.. What fantasy does that pander to??

                                                                                                      Umm... mine.
                                                                                                      I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade...

                                                                                                      Webair, bitches.

                                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                                      Working...