Way to go OC Modeling : Re the current HIV mess..

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JustDaveXxx
    I AM JUSTDAVE !
    • Feb 2005
    • 4111

    #196
    Originally posted by bm bradley
    we check the database before a shoot, if there is an issue we call AIM. no one is going to sneak by
    Correct.

    There is no sneaking by. If the test isn't in the AIM data base, there is no shoot. Its that simple.



    I am going to go out on a limb here with a prediction:


    I think that nobody's tests will come up positive for HIV other than patient Zero and maybe his live in girlfriend.

    Patient zero was not a very used, popular strait performer and it is less likely to contract HIV through strait non anal vaginal sex.



    Furthermore if this guy is getting tooled in the ass from dudes, i would venture to say that the home sex life may have been lacking.




    My final answer: Nobody but patient Zero will have contracted HIV.


    And thats thanx to AIMs quick action.


    Smut Peddler Productions.com
    ICQ #378-696-435 / / Skype: JustDaveXxx
    "We shoot custom, exclusive content your way"

    Comment

    • DWB
      Registered User
      • Jul 2003
      • 31779

      #197
      Originally posted by Porno Dan
      remember, something positive always happens out of something negative
      Something positive has happened already.


      Originally posted by AmeliaG
      It seems like the AIM system is doing what it is supposed to do, in catching the infection early, notifying the folks who needed to be notified, quarantining the folks who need to be quarantined
      I have no shot in LA in years so things may be a little different now, but does every single shoot, for every sized company or one man show, get logged at AIM now? If not, there are a lot of holes left wide open. Can someone bring me up to speed on this.

      What about people who don't test at AIM and use another service?

      Comment

      • Grapesoda
        So Fucking Banned
        • Jul 2003
        • 46238

        #198
        Originally posted by JustDaveXxx

        My final answer: Nobody but patient Zero will have contracted HIV.


        And thats thanx to AIMs quick action.
        I'm going with this as well

        Comment

        • Grapesoda
          So Fucking Banned
          • Jul 2003
          • 46238

          #199
          Originally posted by DirtyWhiteBoy
          Something positive has happened already.




          I have no shot in LA in years so things may be a little different now, but does every single shoot, for every sized company or one man show, get logged at AIM now? If not, there are a lot of holes left wide open. Can someone bring me up to speed on this.

          What about people who don't test at AIM and use another service?
          no shoots are logged at AIM... the agencies and producers keep track of the shoots, as it should be. I would imgaine that AIM called the agencies to sort out the 'list' as well as asking the talent themselves.

          not very many other 'services' are excected however we as producers know who they are and the talent and agents do as well and ALL have a choice to shoot or not with a non AIM test
          Last edited by Grapesoda; 10-15-2010, 03:02 PM.

          Comment

          • xxxjay
            Tube groupie.
            • Aug 2002
            • 13482

            #200
            Originally posted by Alprazolam
            link to post please?
            J-Rock had it removed.
            http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/

            Comment

            • RaiderCash_Dominik
              Confirmed User
              • Jan 2010
              • 1145

              #201
              Originally posted by DirtyWhiteBoy
              However, ALL of them continue to work as prostitutes afterwards.
              Thats what I remember about Thailand. You see these guys all over them and you just wonder. Very sad.

              Comment

              • V_RocKs
                Damn Right I Kiss Ass!
                • Nov 2003
                • 32447

                #202
                The law only precludes the business aspects from outing his status. It doesn't stop Joe-citizen from speculating his status so not posting in this thread if you have a business relationship that caused you to be knowledgeable of his status is a good idea.

                However, the rest of us can say what we want to!

                I think having gay talent work in straight videos is just gay...

                Comment

                • DWB
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2003
                  • 31779

                  #203
                  Originally posted by JustDaveXxx
                  Furthermore if this guy is getting tooled in the ass from dudes...
                  You have a way with words my friend.


                  Originally posted by bm bradley
                  no shoots are logged at AIM... the agencies and producers keep track of the shoots, as it should be. I would imgaine that AIM called the agencies to sort out the 'list' as well as asking the talent themselves.

                  OK, that is what I thought. Thanks.

                  Comment

                  • Imortyl Pussycat
                    Confirmed User
                    • Apr 2006
                    • 5449

                    #204
                    Originally posted by xxxjay

                    BTW: I am 100X better looking than everyone that reads GFY.
                    not one of us little dollies in the biz would kick your cute ass out of bed
                    feeling so nostalgic reading your posts here, it's been quite some time since i've seen you in this form.........refreshing have an amazing time in xxxxx and leave all this shit behind for the weekend, it will still be here when you return.
                    Julie Larson
                    julie {at} juicyads.com
                    skype: imortylpussycat

                    Buy & Sell Ads on The Most Sexy Advertising Network on the Planet
                    available ad spots | sign up now

                    Comment

                    • Robbie
                      Leaner, Meaner, Faster
                      • Aug 2002
                      • 20960

                      #205
                      Originally posted by DirtyWhiteBoy

                      What about people who don't test at AIM and use another service?
                      We use talenttestingservice.com all the time...as do many other production companies. And if there were another company that came on the scene that did the service MUCH cheaper...I'd go with them in a heartbeat. The more competition the better in my opinion. But yeah, the drawback is in a situation like this is: how many different testing companies does a producer have to get a producers login to run around and check.

                      I think your method of going to the doctor with the talent and getting the almost instant test done with both people shooting would be a much more effective test. But that was already a major thread back last year when this same shitstorm struck then.
                      -Robbie
                      ClaudiaMarie.Com

                      Comment

                      • Grapesoda
                        So Fucking Banned
                        • Jul 2003
                        • 46238

                        #206
                        Originally posted by Robbie
                        We use talenttestingservice.com all the time...as do many other production companies. And if there were another company that came on the scene that did the service MUCH cheaper...I'd go with them in a heartbeat. The more competition the better in my opinion. But yeah, the drawback is in a situation like this is: how many different testing companies does a producer have to get a producers login to run around and check.

                        I think your method of going to the doctor with the talent and getting the almost instant test done with both people shooting would be a much more effective test. But that was already a major thread back last year when this same shitstorm struck then.
                        I check on the swabs today.... $33 for each kit.. 20-40 min results

                        Comment

                        • Robbie
                          Leaner, Meaner, Faster
                          • Aug 2002
                          • 20960

                          #207
                          Originally posted by bm bradley
                          I check on the swabs today.... $33 for each kit.. 20-40 min results
                          And just like the last time this argument happened...AIM is going to say it's not accurate enough. It's the kind of thing that would put them out of business.

                          I say...I'd go with the swab test on the spot right before the shoot over a 28 to 29 day old AIM test report.

                          Neither is 100%, but I think the swab represents much better risk management.
                          -Robbie
                          ClaudiaMarie.Com

                          Comment

                          • Grapesoda
                            So Fucking Banned
                            • Jul 2003
                            • 46238

                            #208
                            Originally posted by Robbie
                            And just like the last time this argument happened...AIM is going to say it's not accurate enough. It's the kind of thing that would put them out of business.

                            I say...I'd go with the swab test on the spot right before the shoot over a 28 to 29 day old AIM test report.

                            Neither is 100%, but I think the swab represents much better risk management.
                            why not both? lets see if I get them, used paypal.. gonna find out if the company is legit I guess
                            Last edited by Grapesoda; 10-15-2010, 04:41 PM.

                            Comment

                            • epitome
                              So Fucking Lame
                              • Jun 2009
                              • 12156

                              #209
                              Originally posted by bm bradley
                              I check on the swabs today.... $33 for each kit.. 20-40 min results
                              Search Amazon. You can get them in bulk (100+) cheaper. I recognize the packaging as the same used by my free clinic.

                              Comment

                              • Jim_Gunn
                                Confirmed User
                                • Feb 2003
                                • 5702

                                #210
                                Originally posted by Robbie
                                We use talenttestingservice.com all the time...as do many other production companies. And if there were another company that came on the scene that did the service MUCH cheaper...I'd go with them in a heartbeat. The more competition the better in my opinion. But yeah, the drawback is in a situation like this is: how many different testing companies does a producer have to get a producers login to run around and check.

                                I think your method of going to the doctor with the talent and getting the almost instant test done with both people shooting would be a much more effective test. But that was already a major thread back last year when this same shitstorm struck then.
                                TalentTestingService.com has an excellent service run by good people and I have also had fast online results for a similar talent testing panel with AnyLabTestNow.com. Those two and AIM are pretty much the standards I would recommend any talent use.

                                Comment

                                Working...