Did this woman just OWN Albert Einstein?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • GigoloMason
    Confirmed User
    • May 2005
    • 742
    #51
    Originally posted by 12clicks
    yes, dick, over icecream. I did it.
    12stein? Naw to jewish heheheh

      Comment

      • 12clicks
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Jan 2001
        • 19816
        #52
        Originally posted by GigoloMason
        12stein? Naw to jewish heheheh
        pronounce it "stine" and not "steen" and I'll be ok.
        I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

          Comment

          • $5 submissions
            I help you SUCCEED
            • Nov 2003
            • 32189
            #53
            Originally posted by 12clicks
            pronounce it "stine" and not "steen" and I'll be ok.
            This reminds me of that early segment in "Young Frankenstein."

            It's pronounced "FrankenSTEEN"...

            "EYEgore" please.. not "EEgor"

              Comment

              • 12clicks
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Jan 2001
                • 19816
                #54
                Originally posted by $5 submissions
                This reminds me of that early segment in "Young Frankenstein."

                It's pronounced "FrankenSTEEN"...

                "EYEgore" please.. not "EEgor"

                dude, it makes all the difference
                I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

                  Comment

                  • jmk
                    Confirmed User
                    • Sep 2002
                    • 5391
                    #55
                    Never say never ?

                      Comment

                      • GigoloMason
                        Confirmed User
                        • May 2005
                        • 742
                        #56
                        Just in case you're actually interested ;)

                        Stanford Confirms it with particle accelerators.
                        http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/th...elativity.html

                        In particle accelerators, particles are moving very close to the speed of light where the length and time effects are large. This has allowed us to clearly verify that length contraction and time dilation do occur.

                        GPS Satellites operation also confirms it:
                        http://www.physicscentral.com/writers/2000/will.html

                        But at 38 microseconds per day, the relativistic offset in the rates of the satellite clocks is so large that, if left uncompensated, it would cause navigational errors that accumulate faster than 10 km per day! GPS accounts for relativity by electronically adjusting the rates of the satellite clocks, and by building mathematical corrections into the computer chips which solve for the user's location. Without the proper application of relativity, GPS would fail in its navigational functions within about 2 minutes.

                        Hafele and Keating Experiment with atomic clocks on airplanes:
                        http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...iv/airtim.html

                        These results provide an unambiguous empirical resolution of the famous clock "paradox" with macroscopic clocks."

                          Comment

                          • $5 submissions
                            I help you SUCCEED
                            • Nov 2003
                            • 32189
                            #57
                            Nice find, Mason!

                            Originally posted by GigoloMason
                            Just in case you're actually interested ;)

                            Stanford Confirms it with particle accelerators.
                            http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/th...elativity.html

                            In particle accelerators, particles are moving very close to the speed of light where the length and time effects are large. This has allowed us to clearly verify that length contraction and time dilation do occur.

                            GPS Satellites operation also confirms it:
                            http://www.physicscentral.com/writers/2000/will.html

                            But at 38 microseconds per day, the relativistic offset in the rates of the satellite clocks is so large that, if left uncompensated, it would cause navigational errors that accumulate faster than 10 km per day! GPS accounts for relativity by electronically adjusting the rates of the satellite clocks, and by building mathematical corrections into the computer chips which solve for the user's location. Without the proper application of relativity, GPS would fail in its navigational functions within about 2 minutes.

                            Hafele and Keating Experiment with atomic clocks on airplanes:
                            http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...iv/airtim.html

                            These results provide an unambiguous empirical resolution of the famous clock "paradox" with macroscopic clocks."

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 template Next
                              Working...