Did this woman just OWN Albert Einstein?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • $5 submissions
    I help you SUCCEED
    • Nov 2003
    • 32189

    #1

    Did this woman just OWN Albert Einstein?

    http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/...08/99-hau.html

    Albert Einstein and just about every other physicist insisted that light travels 186,000 miles a second in free space, and that it can't be speeded-up or slowed down. But in 1998, Hau, for the first time in history, slowed light to 38 miles an hour, about the speed of rush-hour traffic.
  • Musson
    Confirmed User
    • Feb 2007
    • 187

    #2
    In a way ... YES.
    NEW DATING AFFILIATE PROGRAM

    http://partner.goldflirt.com/?affid=1366

    Comment

    • Paraskass
      Confirmed User
      • May 2002
      • 5829

      #3
      science is fucked up... just like life...

      motherfuckers

      Comment

      • $5 submissions
        I help you SUCCEED
        • Nov 2003
        • 32189

        #4
        There's tons of hurdles left but one possibly HUGE implication of this technology is COMMUNICATIONS. Fiber optics using "sculpted" light.

        Comment

        • Paraskass
          Confirmed User
          • May 2002
          • 5829

          #5
          the point is, my penis is huge... & my sperm explodes at 187,000 mph. WAY faster than light, IMHO

          Comment

          • notabook
            Confirmed User
            • Apr 2006
            • 9748

            #6
            I love her Hitler salute, so sexy.





            Sieg Heil indeed.

            Comment

            • bobby666
              boots are my religion
              • Nov 2005
              • 21765

              #7
              no no no e= mc2 always

              Comment

              • Musson
                Confirmed User
                • Feb 2007
                • 187

                #8
                Originally posted by notabook
                I love her Hitler salute, so sexy.





                Sieg Heil indeed.
                Right you are
                NEW DATING AFFILIATE PROGRAM

                http://partner.goldflirt.com/?affid=1366

                Comment

                • adultseo
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jun 2005
                  • 365

                  #9
                  Einstein was and still is right. Light travels at a constant 186,000 miles per second in vacuum.
                  The key to get ranked one in Google is to provide the best.

                  Comment

                  • BusterBunny
                    perverted justice decoy
                    • Aug 2005
                    • 19291

                    #10
                    Originally posted by notabook
                    I love her Hitler salute, so sexy.





                    Sieg Heil indeed.
                    my sig caught gonoherpasyphilaids and died

                    Comment

                    • Linkster
                      Confirmed User
                      • Feb 2003
                      • 3216

                      #11
                      Originally posted by adultseo
                      Einstein was and still is right. Light travels at a constant 186,000 miles per second in vacuum.
                      Yep - and unfiltered as well as unfettered by an atmosphere Unfortunately the author just uses that stupid shit as hype - she did it with clouds of artificially cooled atoms which, while a noble pursuit has nothing to do with Einsteins use of the speed of light in space in his calculations - and it was Roemer in the 1600s that actually came up with the first real measurement of the speed
                      Porn Links Crak for your bank account - Get Addicted
                      FREE LIVE CAM SHOWS

                      Comment

                      • Contra
                        Confirmed User
                        • Dec 2006
                        • 437

                        #12
                        It has everything to do with it. Einstein used light as the universal constant. If the speed of light varies then e=mc2 is wrong.

                        Comment

                        • LadyMischief
                          Orgasms N Such!
                          • Sep 2002
                          • 18135

                          #13
                          Einstein never claimed to be perfect. He put forward theories, some proven right over time, some a little off, etc. Theory isn't THE WAY THINGS ARE, it's just a theory.

                          ICQ 3522039
                          Content Manager - orgasm.com
                          [email protected]

                          Comment

                          • GatorB
                            The Demon & 12clicks
                            • Oct 2001
                            • 18208

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Contra
                            It has everything to do with it. Einstein used light as the universal constant. If the speed of light varies then e=mc2 is wrong.
                            I think you need to brush up on your physics. You're not getting it. This crazy bitches shit doen't effect e=mc2. I do suppose though if you built a chamber 5 miles X 5 miles X 5 miles and had the interrrior cooled down to 460 below zero and set of nuclear fission reaction you see what a nuclear explosion would look like in slow motion. Just a theory though.

                            Comment

                            • Linkster
                              Confirmed User
                              • Feb 2003
                              • 3216

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Contra
                              It has everything to do with it. Einstein used light as the universal constant. If the speed of light varies then e=mc2 is wrong.

                              He used the speed of light in space - not the speed of light in a lab with atoms cooled to slow down the light - so the constant still works - not that it really matters because the E=mc2 isnt all together a correct statement anyway - but based on replies here I better not go into why - suffice it to say that the equation works with the matter known at the nuclear level - there have been many discoveries of smaller particles since then which while obeying the law of conservation - have other losses that weren't accounted for in that equation - if youre real interested - search for "binding energy"
                              Porn Links Crak for your bank account - Get Addicted
                              FREE LIVE CAM SHOWS

                              Comment

                              • GatorB
                                The Demon & 12clicks
                                • Oct 2001
                                • 18208

                                #16
                                Originally posted by Linkster
                                not that it really matters because the E=mc2 isnt all together a correct statement anyway - but based on replies here I better not go into why -
                                Why is that Einstien? Lt's see because c stands for "speed of light in a vaccuum" but even space is not a TRUE vaccuum. There are still atoms scattered about even in the most desolate areas of space even if they are spread very far apart. Is that why it's not completely correct?

                                Comment

                                • Violetta
                                  Affiliate
                                  • Jul 2004
                                  • 28735

                                  #17
                                  I wish Einstein was still around... I LOVE HIM!!!!!
                                  M&A Queen

                                  Comment

                                  • BOSS1
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Sep 2005
                                    • 4331

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by Contra
                                    It has everything to do with it. Einstein used light as the universal constant. If the speed of light varies then e=mc2 is wrong.
                                    wow... i guess is missed where the constant speed of light is in a vacum according to Einstein theory ....

                                    NEW SITE: Stockings Kingdom
                                    Lesbians in Latex, Lesbians in Stockings, Granny Sex, BDSM Porn, Latex and Sex, Custom Foot Fetish, Femdom Movies and Kinky Porn Pass.
                                    300+ hosted flvs, 500+ hosted galleries, Page Peel ADs.. NATS export and payouts twice a month

                                    Comment

                                    • BOSS1
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Sep 2005
                                      • 4331

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by Linkster
                                      He used the speed of light in space - not the speed of light in a lab with atoms cooled to slow down the light - so the constant still works - not that it really matters because the E=mc2 isnt all together a correct statement anyway - but based on replies here I better not go into why - suffice it to say that the equation works with the matter known at the nuclear level - there have been many discoveries of smaller particles since then which while obeying the law of conservation - have other losses that weren't accounted for in that equation - if youre real interested - search for "binding energy"
                                      sounds like someone paid attention in school

                                      these people will believe anything they hear

                                      NEW SITE: Stockings Kingdom
                                      Lesbians in Latex, Lesbians in Stockings, Granny Sex, BDSM Porn, Latex and Sex, Custom Foot Fetish, Femdom Movies and Kinky Porn Pass.
                                      300+ hosted flvs, 500+ hosted galleries, Page Peel ADs.. NATS export and payouts twice a month

                                      Comment

                                      • Linkster
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Feb 2003
                                        • 3216

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by GatorB
                                        Why is that Einstien? Lt's see because c stands for "speed of light in a vaccuum" but even space is not a TRUE vaccuum. There are still atoms scattered about even in the most desolate areas of space even if they are spread very far apart. Is that why it's not completely correct?

                                        No - actually the reason its not correct is that since Einstein first deveoped his theories, other little discoveries have been made leading to quantum physics which delves a little deeper into the energy equation - showing that there are some losses at the sub-particle level that cannot be explained away as energy or mass. The other explanation that might "weigh" in here is that the photon (which is what light is made up of) is assumed to be 0 mass - which is probably not correct - it probably has a very small mass approaching 0 but we cannot say for sure that it is perfectly 0

                                        The second reason its not correct is that the speed of light does actually change - year to year - by a fraction due to the slowing down of the speed of rotation of the earth by 1/10E5 of a second - which changes the actual duration of a second in time - and since C is a measurement of speed which is in M/sec the changing of the duration of a second changes the constants' value

                                        Third - lay-people usually make the same mistake when looking at this C constant - the primary way it is used is just the opposite measurement - it is used to measure the standard length for a meter by measuring the distance light travels in a particular time interval in a vacuum - Einsteins original theory just stated that the speed of light constant was in "space" - not a vacuum
                                        Porn Links Crak for your bank account - Get Addicted
                                        FREE LIVE CAM SHOWS

                                        Comment

                                        • teksonline
                                          So Fucking Banned
                                          • Jan 2005
                                          • 2904

                                          #21
                                          fuck communications... we can now have postage stamp sized chips in our phones that contain entire countries of organized data, and can beam the answers to a implanted chip in our heads, so we remove the "learning curve"
                                          and actually become correct "know it alls" in mere split second

                                          Comment

                                          • smack
                                            Push Porn Like Weight.
                                            • Mar 2002
                                            • 10652

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by Linkster
                                            The second reason its not correct is that the speed of light does actually change - year to year - by a fraction due to the slowing down of the speed of rotation of the earth by 1/10E5 of a second - which changes the actual duration of a second in time - and since C is a measurement of speed which is in M/sec the changing of the duration of a second changes the constants' value
                                            doesn't that just mean that the speed doesn't change. just our perception of it changes?

                                            time wouldn't be changing anywhere else in the universe. just our measurement of it.
                                            Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war.

                                            Comment

                                            • GatorB
                                              The Demon & 12clicks
                                              • Oct 2001
                                              • 18208

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by Linkster
                                              The second reason its not correct is that the speed of light does actually change - year to year - by a fraction due to the slowing down of the speed of rotation of the earth by 1/10E5 of a second - which changes the actual duration of a second in time - and since C is a measurement of speed which is in M/sec the changing of the duration of a second changes the constants' value
                                              That's retarded. WTF does the rotation of the earth have to do with the speed of light everywhere else in the universe? Or time for that matter.

                                              Third - lay-people
                                              Who in the fuck are you? What you some super genius and we are all retards? I'm not getting into a "who has a bigger IQ" contest, but not everyone here is stupid. My IQ is at least 130. I was invited to take the SAT in the 6th grade and I could be in Mensa if really wanted to be. And I'm sure there are several others here that are equally or even more intelligent. So quit coming off as you know every fucking thing. You probably got that crap off of wikpedia or something anyways.

                                              Comment

                                              • 12clicks
                                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                • Jan 2001
                                                • 19814

                                                #24
                                                [QUOTE=$5 submissions;12251215]Did this woman just OWN Albert Einstein?[QUOTE]
                                                hell, I did that over icecream a few years back

                                                http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...light=debunked
                                                I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

                                                Comment

                                                • mailman
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Mar 2001
                                                  • 6311

                                                  #25
                                                  I have yet to read it but you think with the cost to go to harvard they could do up a better website!

                                                  Comment

                                                  • Linkster
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Feb 2003
                                                    • 3216

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by smack
                                                    doesn't that just mean that the speed doesn't change. just our perception of it changes?

                                                    time wouldn't be changing anywhere else in the universe. just our measurement of it.
                                                    Thats correct - but then that is exactly what the whole theory of relativity hinges on - our perception


                                                    Gator - see above - and sorry if you took "layperson" to mean something derogatory - wasnt meant that way - I used to teach nuclear physics and worked as a physicist for 20 years so I always used that term to differentiate between two ways of teaching
                                                    Porn Links Crak for your bank account - Get Addicted
                                                    FREE LIVE CAM SHOWS

                                                    Comment

                                                    • crockett
                                                      in a van by the river
                                                      • May 2003
                                                      • 76818

                                                      #27
                                                      So how much datta can we send on the internet in the future.. That's all I want to know 8)
                                                      In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • OzMan
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • Sep 2003
                                                        • 9162

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by adultseo
                                                        Einstein was and still is right. Light travels at a constant 186,000 miles per second in vacuum.
                                                        True but it's a complete waste of time having that feature. I mean who the fuck vacuums at night anyway?

                                                        Comment

                                                        • Babaganoosh
                                                          ♥♥♥ Likes Hugs ♥♥♥
                                                          • Nov 2001
                                                          • 15841

                                                          #29
                                                          http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/essay.htm

                                                          A good read for anyone whether you're a fan of Einstein or not.
                                                          I like pie.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • theruyan
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Dec 2006
                                                            • 114

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by LadyMischief
                                                            Einstein never claimed to be perfect. He put forward theories, some proven right over time, some a little off, etc. Theory isn't THE WAY THINGS ARE, it's just a theory.
                                                            You are woefully ignorant about science madam. A theory in science is not a "hunch" or a "guess" it is an explanation of the data. Unlike religion, science is not dogmatic. This is called falsifiability.

                                                            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory

                                                            In science, a theory is a mathematical description, a logical explanation, a verified hypothesis, or a proven model of the manner of interaction of a set of natural phenomena, capable of predicting future occurrences or observations of the same kind, and capable of being tested through experiment or otherwise falsified through empirical observation. It follows from this that for scientists "theory" and "fact" do not necessarily stand in opposition. For example, it is a fact that an apple dropped on earth has been observed to fall towards the center of the planet, and the theory which explains why the apple behaves so is the current theory of gravitation.

                                                            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability

                                                            In science and the philosophy of science, falsifiability is the logical property of empirical statements, related to contingency and defeasibility, that they must admit of logical counterexamples. In essence, for an assertion to be falsifiable, it must be logically possible to make an observation or do a physical experiment that would show the assertion to be false. This is in contrast to tautologies, formal and mathematical statements that are universally true as a logical consequence of the definitions and axioms they are based on..

                                                            Comment

                                                            • Alex
                                                              So Fucking Banned (YEA!!)
                                                              • Jun 2004
                                                              • 10963

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by Paraskass
                                                              the point is, my penis is huge... & my sperm explodes at 187,000 mph. WAY faster than light, IMHO
                                                              Speed of light is 186,000 miles per second.
                                                              Care about me?
                                                              Who?
                                                              Me!
                                                              Who?

                                                              Comment

                                                              • darling2
                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                • Jul 2006
                                                                • 345

                                                                #32
                                                                Typical newspaper science.

                                                                Einstein said that this was the light of speed in VACUUM it can't be speeded-up or slowed down in VACUUM.

                                                                When light travels through materials, it slows down. If it wouldn't lenses would not work.

                                                                This lady made light pass through a "cloud of ultracold atoms" which is not vacuum.

                                                                The lady did a great job, but Einstein was still right!

                                                                Comment

                                                                • RawAlex
                                                                  So Fucking Banned
                                                                  • Oct 2003
                                                                  • 9465

                                                                  #33
                                                                  More importantly, it would appear that she has discovered a method to turn gold into lead. There are very few reasons to make light more move slowly, few good applications, it really isn't something everyone goes "wow, I wish the light moved more slowly" (Except maybe after a few too many tabs of E... but that is a different type of science).

                                                                  The real trick is to find a way to make something (anything) move faster than light. That is the lead to gold conversion we all dream of.

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • Linkster
                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                    • Feb 2003
                                                                    • 3216

                                                                    #34
                                                                    RawAlex - funny thing was that even Einstein said in his general relativity paper that the speed of light could be changed - had to do with the bending of light for the curvature of space - but he still tried for the gold
                                                                    Porn Links Crak for your bank account - Get Addicted
                                                                    FREE LIVE CAM SHOWS

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • Randyyy
                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                      • Jan 2007
                                                                      • 2240

                                                                      #35
                                                                      albert was one cool mofo
                                                                      need video editing done? hit me up!
                                                                      ICQ: 10347906

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • Persignup Qon
                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                        • Jun 2005
                                                                        • 853

                                                                        #36
                                                                        Originally posted by mailman
                                                                        I have yet to read it but you think with the cost to go to harvard they could do up a better website!
                                                                        co-muthafuckin-sign
                                                                        OnProbation.com | PerSignup.com - Now Paying PPS and RevShare!
                                                                        {{ Portfolio: TKME | AC | BGDINT | ESP - More Here... }}
                                                                        If You Really Get Paid in Adult, You Should Be Getting Paid By Us!

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • BigBen
                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                          • Nov 2004
                                                                          • 2299

                                                                          #37
                                                                          Originally posted by $5 submissions
                                                                          ...slowed light to 38 miles an hour, about the speed of rush-hour traffic.
                                                                          The author has apparently never been in rush hour traffic in LA.

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • $5 submissions
                                                                            I help you SUCCEED
                                                                            • Nov 2003
                                                                            • 32189

                                                                            #38
                                                                            Originally posted by BigBen
                                                                            The author has apparently never been in rush hour traffic in LA.
                                                                            Definitely. 405 and the 10 are HORRIBLE. Well, at least the cars MOVE. I thought that was the worst until I moved to the Philippines... Nothing can compare to Manila (SLEX) traffic between 6PM and 9PM.... damn.

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • DirtyDave
                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                              • Jul 2003
                                                                              • 198

                                                                              #39
                                                                              Originally posted by Linkster
                                                                              The second reason its not correct is that the speed of light does actually change - year to year - by a fraction due to the slowing down of the speed of rotation of the earth by 1/10E5 of a second - which changes the actual duration of a second in time - and since C is a measurement of speed which is in M/sec the changing of the duration of a second changes the constants' value
                                                                              So this is WAY beyond me but I had a thought a couple of months ago and maybe you could explain this to me.

                                                                              Our perception of things is affected by our speed. So what is the ralative net affect of the idea that people on earth are all moving at the same speed (or close enough). But we are on a rotating planet, going around a sun, that is moving around a galaxy, that is moving through a universe that has several galaxies.

                                                                              As too what exactly do I mean? I already said this was WAY beyond me!

                                                                              David.
                                                                              DelanyDecolleur.com :: Satin and Nylon Nude Glamour Model

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • Fap
                                                                                Just Du It
                                                                                • Feb 2004
                                                                                • 12094

                                                                                #40
                                                                                Only if women had the right to vote..

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • 12clicks
                                                                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                  • Jan 2001
                                                                                  • 19814

                                                                                  #41
                                                                                  Originally posted by dsatchell
                                                                                  So this is WAY beyond me but I had a thought a couple of months ago and maybe you could explain this to me.

                                                                                  Our perception of things is affected by our speed. So what is the ralative net affect of the idea that people on earth are all moving at the same speed (or close enough). But we are on a rotating planet, going around a sun, that is moving around a galaxy, that is moving through a universe that has several galaxies.

                                                                                  As too what exactly do I mean? I already said this was WAY beyond me!

                                                                                  David.
                                                                                  this is where most of these theories including Einstiens fall apart.
                                                                                  Perception has no place in science. "relativity" is a concept that doesn't hold water.
                                                                                  the speed of light *is*
                                                                                  time *is* it doesn't matter if the human perception of it has changed, time itself has not.
                                                                                  I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • dakota1358
                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                    • Oct 2005
                                                                                    • 2114

                                                                                    #42
                                                                                    Does this mean I can download porn faster?
                                                                                    Carmen Cocks Rocks

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • $5 submissions
                                                                                      I help you SUCCEED
                                                                                      • Nov 2003
                                                                                      • 32189

                                                                                      #43
                                                                                      Originally posted by 12clicks
                                                                                      this is where most of these theories including Einstiens fall apart.
                                                                                      Perception has no place in science. "relativity" is a concept that doesn't hold water.
                                                                                      the speed of light *is*
                                                                                      time *is* it doesn't matter if the human perception of it has changed, time itself has not.
                                                                                      Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (published in 1927) ?

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • $5 submissions
                                                                                        I help you SUCCEED
                                                                                        • Nov 2003
                                                                                        • 32189

                                                                                        #44
                                                                                        Originally posted by dakota1358
                                                                                        Does this mean I can download porn faster?
                                                                                        Eventually yes, as soon as "sculpted light" is commercialized. It will take a while. Then again, given how fast semiconductor speed ramps up and if there's a huge enough market, the timeframe will probably be sooner rather than later.

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • candyflip
                                                                                          Carpe Visio
                                                                                          • Jul 2002
                                                                                          • 43073

                                                                                          #45
                                                                                          Just? Says she did it in 1998.

                                                                                          Spend you some brain.
                                                                                          Email Me

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • 12clicks
                                                                                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                            • Jan 2001
                                                                                            • 19814

                                                                                            #46
                                                                                            Originally posted by $5 submissions
                                                                                            Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (published in 1927) ?
                                                                                            as I said, the perception is not the reality. Man's ability to measure may improve his perception but it does not alter or change that which is.
                                                                                            I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • GigoloMason
                                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                                              • May 2005
                                                                                              • 742

                                                                                              #47
                                                                                              Originally posted by 12clicks
                                                                                              as I said, the perception is not the reality. Man's ability to measure may improve his perception but it does not alter or change that which is.
                                                                                              Actually that's demonstrabally false Or more accuratly the biggest disconnect between Newtonian and Quantum physics.

                                                                                              And whoever posted this really needs to re-read what einstein actually wrote before slamming it, as what this lady demonstrated has nothing to do with Einstein's claims. In any event parts of einstein's theories have been proven wrong\incomplete before.

                                                                                              Shit all you need to prove you can change the speed of light is a glass lense.
                                                                                              Last edited by GigoloMason; 04-14-2007, 06:05 PM.

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • Ace_luffy
                                                                                                www.creationcrew.com
                                                                                                • Feb 2005
                                                                                                • 12167

                                                                                                #48
                                                                                                Originally posted by notabook
                                                                                                I love her Hitler salute, so sexy.





                                                                                                Sieg Heil indeed.
                                                                                                that's really great nice posture.....


                                                                                                ++ Adult and Mainstream Websites Designs | 10 banners for only $50 | html5 Banners ++
                                                                                                email : [email protected] Telegram : https://t.me/creationcrew WhatsApp : +63 956 420 4819 | HTML5/Responsive Site - Div/CSS - ElevatedX - NATs - Wordpress

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • 12clicks
                                                                                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                                  • Jan 2001
                                                                                                  • 19814

                                                                                                  #49
                                                                                                  Originally posted by GigoloMason
                                                                                                  In any event parts of einstein's theories have been proven wrong\incomplete before.
                                                                                                  yes, dick, over icecream. I did it.
                                                                                                  I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • Linkster
                                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                                    • Feb 2003
                                                                                                    • 3216

                                                                                                    #50
                                                                                                    Originally posted by 12clicks
                                                                                                    Perception has no place in science. "relativity" is a concept that doesn't hold water.
                                                                                                    the speed of light *is*
                                                                                                    time *is* it doesn't matter if the human perception of it has changed, time itself has not.
                                                                                                    And like Mason posted - this is where your "theory" falls apart - the speed of light *is not* - it is only based on mans' ability to measure using the best instruments (and the most accurate) that he has at that particular time in history - using the tools that are available today (pulse lasers and atomic clocks) we still see the effect of the slowing down of the rotation of the earth (an effect of the tides/oceans movements) causing the measurement of a second changing slightly - therefore it IS all relative

                                                                                                    If you want to go to the philosophical side of things and say that time is a constant but mans ability to measure it changes daily - then I would say you have a good argument - but that has nothing to do with his perception - just his limitations
                                                                                                    Last edited by Linkster; 04-14-2007, 06:19 PM.
                                                                                                    Porn Links Crak for your bank account - Get Addicted
                                                                                                    FREE LIVE CAM SHOWS

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    Working...