Quote:
Originally Posted by erooup
The truth is, you are just afraid your batch of worthless domains become even less valuable when .XXX hits the internet.
FSC are so one-sided in this case, they will only represent those who oppose .XXX - so much for free speech.
|
OK -- how should the FSC go about representing
both sides of the debate in this situation? How would that work, and how well would it sit with FSC members, given that their board of directors and vast majority of their membership (the members that have stated a position publicly, at least) is opposed to .XXX?
The FSC has not expressed that it believes you or any other individual doesn't have the right to voice support for .XXX. What they have done, as an organization, is take the
collective position that the FSC itself is against the measure, and in taking that position, it is in agreement with the majority of people within the adult industry who have a stake in the outcome of ICM's application.
What's wrong with that?