Dont contact me to run a campaign on that shit idiots.
-
-
well been nice knowing ya, I predict a banning soon. -
oh and I won't push it either but it's not CPComment
-
I am talking bets on how long it will take before the hammer strikes....
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
yea ban me please.Comment
-
by the way its littlelupe.comComment
-
why would I get banned, someone hit me up hiring me to promote that site, and I have that shit in my icq logs now.Comment
-
Comment
-
the devil will find you.Comment
-
Comment
-
Lmfao At You Clowns!Comment
-
BAN HIM! BAN HIM! hahaha but I was almost at 300 posts!Comment
-
For the record: Site is 2257 compliant... girl is 18 bla bla
Off the record: I really "looks like" girl is under 18...
***DISCLAIMER: Me not accusing anyone in anyhow engaging in CP.. ;)Comment
-
1. i'm sure she's over age, they wouldn't dare do anything that dumb.
2. i wouldnt promote it just because she looks way too youngComment
-
i checked a gallery of her and she sure looks very young but on the other hand it looks all legal to me...Comment
-
§ 2256. Definitions for chapter
(8) (B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; ....
(11) the term ?indistinguishable? used with respect to a depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct.
-----------------------------
This being the case, it could be considered cp if the powers that be decided to make it such.. I'd say a rather large gray area in this particular situation..Comment
-
++ Adult and Mainstream Websites Designs | 10 banners for only $50 | html5 Banners ++
email : [email protected] Telegram : https://t.me/creationcrew WhatsApp : +63 956 420 4819 | HTML5/Responsive Site - Div/CSS - ElevatedX - NATs - Wordpress
Comment
-
no reason to ban him
that group has a history of finding girls that look young as fuck. i can imagine the celebration that would go on in those offices if they found a 10 year old look alike
now, im sure they have their ducks in a row with this girl, but dont tell me she clearly looks over 18. she doesnt't, and she is not intended toWebmasterchecks Affiliate Payments - fully compatible with nats/mpa3Comment
-
She looks like a skinny 18 year old latina to me, not much different than a lot of them here... Maybe a little young, but not enough to warrant this thread.
Are you guys really influenced that much by the pink hair bows and shit?Comment
-
She is 20 years old and a porn star in spain
She has done 2 features and her boyfriend shot all of the video.
She made the deal and made lots of cash for herself.
Come on now. That is a serious charge and you should be banned.[Comment
-
hey she may look 13 but its ok because the release says shes over 18Comment
-
Since the title of the thread is factually inaccurate and potentially defamatory, AKA totally false, and violates GFY rules, I would say a ban is justified.Comment
-
Good try, but don't quit your day job to be a lawyer - you quoted the stuff without context:
(8) “child pornography” means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where—
(A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
The entirety of section 8B and C is to cover machine generated / photochop style porn.
Good try thought, but you need to work on those critical reading skills.Comment
-
-
Slanderous allegations such as these should most definitely bring a ban to the person who started this thread. Unfortunately, the person has a low post count which to me is indicative of someone using a 2nd GFY account.
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=722195
I'm asking Lensman to take a close look at the IPs this person is using and has used in the past, and to kindly ban all nicknames associated with it.
Thank you very much.Comment
-
oo its a teenrevenue site.
Not shocking in the least.
Comment
-
Accusations of CP with out proof is against GFY rules. You are BannedNo OneComment
-
So fucking banned.Comment
-
FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot comComment
-
Its obvious who they are catering for ...Comment
-
Comment