Iran to execute British soldiers

100 appeasers

Yes I know.

slow tonight.......

you do that leaving out the important stuff of a quote out real well. I see a job at fox for you. I got a friend who is a videographer for them maybe I can get you in . lol

no offense, but this theory is a bit paranoic. There are older and more important issues in the Middle East than you and your USA home.
Not everything in this world revolves around USA. All this shit has much more to do with the israelo-palestinian conflict, which gave birth to terorism as we sadly are confronting with now.

Are you in my family Tony? LMAO this sounds like us!

Is his name Christian? Just curious I know one too.

Of course I do. Which is why attacking Iraq makes even less sense. The terrorists hated Saddam.

my wife freaked the first family dinner she had been too, she thought they were going to go to blows lol. My dad starts it with who saw the sunday news shows and it goes from there lol

No its not, he freelances for fox news ,fox sports ,weather channel , Dr phil and a bunch of others .Fox has been using him almost every week I think they are going to want him full time. I want him to get a fox news hat for my dad, he loves fox news.

Welcome... It's not all about the USA now is it...

It's funny how you reference the conflict between Irsrael and Palestine and say that gave birth to terrorism. So because of that terrorism is okay?

You're right.. there are "older" and more "important" issues. They have to do with Middle Eastern people being treated like second class citizens for centuries. That tends to breed hatred. Or does it not?

Night.
Bling.

See my dad and I think differently on a million different things. So we discuss. And you're right, usually neither of us changes our mind about anything, but we still discuss like civil beings and don't call the other one an idiot or a sheep because they have a different opinion. We actually discuss. And guess what? Sometimes we do change our stance on an issue or mull over a little tidbit brought up by the other person.

Maybe you and your family should try an actual discussion. Its much more enjoyable, and you just may learn something.

Straight from the horses mouth.

Are you OBL's new publicist? He would be extremely proud that you are spreading his message of hatred around.

you no problem with him calling me a lying piece of liberal shit ? Answer that please.I respect my family I dont call them names and they dont call me names Now being italians we do raise our voices. We are passionate people.

Splum = TheKing = Pathfinder

He is not an adult webmaster, he is a right-wing agent provocateur, and not a very good one at that.

ADG Webmaster

Oh crap, that's who it is! I knew his stuff sounded familiar. Thought it was a fake nick for awhile, but this makes more sense.

Actually I didn't see it. But he's a troll anyway so I pay little attention to stuff like that. You aren't a troll so its more noticeable.

Thank you, look at post #20 he called me that so I started using sheep .Your right its immature but I got annoyed.

boringggggggggggggggg

I am simply Splum this is my only "nickname" identity. You just cant face the fact that maybe there ARE conservatives within the adult business. Oh I also run MANY adult websites but my main business is SEO.
I think its pretty fucking pathetic that you cant argue with me on the merits of the argument yet resort to claiming I am past nicknames, but hey I guess thats how less intelligent people argue.

this is funny from someone who called me a lying piece of liberal shit lol

Nah. Splum has been posting for years, I've seen theking posting during the same time. That would make little sense. Different writing styles too.

They could be cousins.

Well thats because you cant stay on topic tony. You keep blaming everything on Bush when clearly problems in the middle east have been problems for decades. This is why I call you a liar because you would rather believe foreign media than your own government.

***tony404 a lying piece of liberal shit***

I said: You said:
You are a liar, and you know what you said is a lie -OR- you are a dumbass. Iran DOES fund people who have killed Americans.

says the person that changed the topic of my writings to suit their own agenda...

Question for you Splum. You are so adamant about being in this war, you call those who oppose it cowards, wimps, and anti-American. So why are you not enlisted in the military?

I know there are conservatives within the adult business (including some at adult.com that runs GFY), I am friends with some even. We can disagree politically, but still do business together.

Nonetheless, I call your bluff - List the many adult websites you run, if you really run them as you claim...I think that this claim of yours is as full of shit as most of your arguments on GFY are.

ADG Webmaster

im lying? the saudis dont fund terror, omg this is a waste of my time you dont know what your talking about. This really shows it.

I dont have to explain myself to you ADG there are quite a few in this business who know who I am personally. It is NONE of your business, if you think I am another nickname by all means check with a moderator lol.

I said you were lying about IRAN because my quote was about IRAN not Saudi Arabia(I dont even know why you brang Saudi Arabia into it).
You DID lie about Iran and you know it and now you are trying to throw off the trail.
Must be short arguments at your house, your dad must rip you alive.

You asked, I answered.

You are the one that claimed to "run MANY adult websites", so since you publically made that claim, you should have no problem backing it up.

ADG Webmaster

I look forward to your apology:

Saudis funding insurgents in Iraq
U.S. fears proxy war with Iranian-backed Shiites could widen
BY ERIC ROSENBERG
Hearst Newspapers

WASHINGTON ? During his inaugural appearance before Congress last week, the new U.S. intelligence czar made a rare public reference to one of Washington's secret dreads.

Mike McConnell, the new director of national intelligence, said there are funds coming from Saudi Arabia, an ostensible U.S. ally, to help Sunni insurgents in Iraq, while Iran is supporting the Shiite militias there.

McConnell's testimony undergirds U.S. concerns that the Iraq civil war could turn into a direct Saudi-Iranian confrontation, with American military forces caught between warring combatants for Islam's two dominant strains.

Separately, Brian Jenkins, a military expert with Rand Corp., a national security and foreign policy research organization, said: "What we already are seeing in Iraq is an emerging proxy war between Saudi-backed Sunnis and Iranian-backed Shia."

If that proxy war cascades into a direct Iranian-Saudi military clash, it could imperil much of the world's oil supply. Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq are Nos. 1, 3 and 4, respectively, in terms of proven oil reserves.

Nawaf Obaid, then a security adviser to the Saudi government, alluded to the tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia in November when he warned in an op-ed column that a U.S. withdrawal of forces from Iraq would result in "massive Saudi intervention to stop Iranian-backed Shiite militias from butchering Iraqi Sunnis." The Saudis fired Obaid after the column was published in the Washington Post.

Tensions between the two nations are the main topic at a summit this weekend that Saudi and Iranian leaders were holding in Saudi Arabia.

The U.S. has a close oil-diplomatic relationship with Saudi Arabia and a long history of shielding the kingdom, as illustrated by McConnell's reluctance to identify the Saudis as a source for support for the Sunni insurgents. His statement was elicited through persistent questioning by Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee and a former assistant attorney general in Michigan.

Levin asked McConnell during a committee hearing about the source of support for Sunni insurgents in Iraq.

McConnell replied: "There is some flow to the Sunni side in terms of funding and weapons and recruits."

Levin continued: "And what countries are those weapons coming from?"

McConnell: "Weapons could come from a variety of countries. Syria probably is one of the major places."

Levin: "What countries other than Syria could either weapons or funding for the Sunni insurgents come from?"

McConnell: The U.S. lacks "clear evidence that it's definitely coming from any one particular government. But there are indications that it could be a variety of countries around Iraq and also from private donors ?"

Levin, interjecting: "What other countries besides Syria? You said that there's evidence that weapons or money for weapons is coming from a number of countries. The one you singled was Syria, but what other countries?"

McConnell: "What I was attempting to say is donors from countries around the area. One would be inside Saudi Arabia, as an example."

McConnell later elaborated that he had "no awareness at this point" whether the Saudi government was directing the support of Sunni insurgents through private donors. Nor did McConnell explain whether Saudi support was flowing to Iraqi insurgents of Sunni allegiance, or to al-Qaida in Iraq ? a Sunni organization ? or to some combination. Al-Qaida carried out the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks that destroyed the World Trade Center and a swath of the Pentagon and killed nearly 3,000 people.

Thomas Fingar, deputy director of national intelligence for analysis, told Levin's committee that "Saudi Arabia as a government is not providing funding" to the Sunni insurgents and that the Saudi government was trying to halt the flow of private funds.

"But they still do flow, to some extent," he said.

The comments from the country's top intelligence officials echo observations by the Iraq Study Group on Page 25 of its 84-page report released in December.

"Funding for the Sunni insurgency comes from private individuals within Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States," said the report by the study group headed by former Secretary of State James Baker and former Rep. Lee Hamilton, D-Ind., "even as those governments help facilitate U.S. military operations in Iraq by providing basing and overflight rights and by cooperating on intelligence issues."

The Saudis have denied they are supporting the Sunni insurgency.

But Steven Simon, a senior member of the National Security Council during the Clinton administration, said Saudi funding of the Sunni insurgency "is one of those things that we dare not speak its name."

"There is a renewed desire to protect the U.S.-Saudi bilateral relationship," Simon said in an interview. "So you don't want to draw public attention to things they are doing that many observers might regard as counter to American interests."

omg
this is an ADULT board -- meaning children are NOT allowed

Nice try the conversation and the thread is about IRAN and you said IRAN doesnt fund the killing of Americans. You = liar.

Oh stop are you 5 yrs old. lol

Go stalk somebody else you freak.
If you think I am going to explain myself to someone like you, you are sadly fucking mistaken. I obviously dont do business with you for a reason.

There you go again, you and Bill Clinton have something in common.. you both are pathological liars.

I didnt lie, I showed you proof. The ones shooting at us are being funded by saudis. thats not a lie.Oh and the present admin doesnt lie? god are you posting from a mental hospital?

Iran does fund terrorists, you said they didnt, sorry but you lied. The thread is about Iran, if you would like to discuss the Saudis I suggest you start a thread about the Saudis. Im not gonna jump from subject to subject with you, you may want to seek treatment for that, its a sign of ADHD.

Any answer?

Ive stated many times I have served in the military and most likely will again. I am not sure what your point is.

So you won't prove your own claim that you "run MANY adult websites".

Why should anyone believe any of your other unsubstantiated claims?

This is an adult webmaster board. Most real webmasters have no problem indicating what specific companies they own or operate, but you appear afraid/unable to do so...

The conservatives I know on GFY, spend most of their time talking biz, instead of talking political BS as Splum does. They are also unafraid of identifying what specific companies they operate or work for.

Splum is a loud mouth outspoken idiot when it comes to his politics, however he hides under a rock when it comes to his business. Obviously he is not here for business, but simply to spew his skewed and mostly ridiculous political views.

Grow some balls, and tell this adult webmaster board what some of the many adult websites are that you claim to run (without a single iota of proof so far), if in fact you really run any (which any reasonable person should also doubt by now), or else explain why it is impossible for you to do name even a single company, among the many that you claim to run.

ADG Webmaster

What branch and unit?

US Army 3RD Chemical Brigade

Your intentions are hostile, if a moderator wants to contact me personally and verify I am in the adult business thats fine and dandy.

Damn, you're pretty paranoid...

When are you going to quit hiding behind fake smokescreens - I thought true patriots were braver than that. Time for you to replace the Stars and Stripes in your sig, with the yellow-stained white sheets that you sleep on.

The bottom line is that you publicly claim to "run MANY adult websites", but you can't publicly back it up.

Name another legitimate webmaster on GFY does that?



ADG Webmaster

What are you implying?

I know of no other legitimate adult webmaster on GFY that has not backed up their claim.

You publicly claim to "run MANY adult websites", but you can't publicly back it up.

If you can't back it up, then the only conclusion is that you are a fraud.

Quit pussying out with others know me, the mods can check, and man up. For someone who claims to have served in the military, you're the biggest wimp I know...

ADG Webmaster

Keep it up, anything else you'd like to add?