One of my members just pointed this fuckwad out to me, you all may want to see if he is reselling your stuff also, he has stuff from almost everyone http://www.skinvideo.com/
I am working on it now, I do not just write the processor, I DMCA everyone in his uplink, anyone who shows up as having anything at all to do with the website, its hosting, its DNS, payment...everyone. Then I start calling.
SKIN VIDEO RESPECTS THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OF THIRD PARTIES. WE ASK OUR USERS TO DO THE SAME. IF YOU BELIEVE THAT CONTENT APPEARING ON THE SKIN VIDEO SITE VIOLATES YOUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, YOU SHOULD PROVIDE SKIN VIDEO'S COPYRIGHT AGENT WITH SUBSTANTIALLY THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
1. A Physical or electronic signature of a person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest.
2. A description of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed, or if there are multiple works, a representative list of the works. Please note that you will be liable for damages (including costs and attorneys' fees) if you materially misrepresent that a file infringes your copyrights.
3. A description of the material that you claim is infringing and information sufficient to establish where it is located on the website, which information should include the complete URL associated with each file, image or video. To delete files from SKIN VIDEO’s index, SKIN VIDEO requires an accurate means by which to identify potentially infringing files. To accurately identify files, you must reference the URL associated with that file, which is located in the location box in your browser.
4. Your address, telephone number, and email address;
5. A statement by you that you have a good faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; and,
6. A statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the above information in your notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf.
SKIN VIDEO's Copyright Agent for notice of claims of copyright infringement can be reached as follows:
SVG Technology, INC,
601 Van Ness Ave #E3-970
San Francisco, California 94102 [email protected]
SKIN VIDEO does not condone posting, reproduction or distribution of material by anyone other than the copyright holder or the copyright holder's authorized agents. SKIN VIDEO RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REMOVE CONTENT IN ITS DISCRETION AND TERMINATE THE ACCOUNTS OF SKIN VIDEO USERS WHO REPEATEDLY INFRINGE, OR APPEAR TO INFRINGE, THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OR OTHER RIGHTS OF THIRD PARTIES.
they are truly scumbags, in xbiz's women of adult or porn I forget the exact name they had the chick who posts on here and works for that scumbag company. A company that makes money off of content that they have no rights too is considered part of our industry, only in adult.
scamming Content Thieves That Lie And Say That They Are Only Serving Content That Have Agreements A Year Ago! Thieves! Thieves! Thieves! Didn't Even Take Two Seconds To Find Lightspeed Dana On There! Guba Liars! What Happened To Pulling And Making Sure All Content Not Authorized Would Go Away? Scammerrrrrrrrs! Guba Doesnt Pay Content Producers To Use Their Content! That Is All!!!!!!!
scamming Content Thieves That Lie And Say That They Are Only Serving Content That Have Agreements A Year Ago! Thieves! Thieves! Thieves! Didn't Even Take Two Seconds To Find Lightspeed Dana On There! Guba Liars! What Happened To Pulling And Making Sure All Content Not Authorized Would Go Away? Scammerrrrrrrrs! Guba Doesnt Pay Content Producers To Use Their Content! That Is All!!!!!!!
You know, I have a very good question. Why hasn't someone sued the living shit out of them yet?
Whitehat is for chumps
If you don't do it, somebody else will - true story!
you know damage, the problem is that they allow user submitted stuff, however they are the ones making the money for the subscriptions through a loophole to which they pay nothing to those content providers via the users uploading materials illegally.
a simple tos addition prohibiting members from distributing content in any form or fashion would be enough to make it so. if members are prohibited from taking said copyrighted materials then maybe you got something
it takes the industry uniting to go after them and get your shit out of their network by no one sending them traffic. unfortunately many people will send them traffic to make money and not support the content producers. ruining their image is about the only thing you can do unless you try some sort of class action or is someone gets wiley and ddos the shit out them, which i want no part of anything illegal. doing something illegal against something illegal doesnt make me feel vindicated.
you know damage, the problem is that they allow user submitted stuff, however they are the ones making the money for the subscriptions through a loophole to which they pay nothing to those content providers via the users uploading materials illegally.
a simple tos addition prohibiting members from distributing content in any form or fashion would be enough to make it so. if members are prohibited from taking said copyrighted materials then maybe you got something
it takes the industry uniting to go after them and get your shit out of their network by no one sending them traffic. unfortunately many people will send them traffic to make money and not support the content producers. ruining their image is about the only thing you can do unless you try some sort of class action or is someone gets wiley and ddos the shit out them, which i want no part of anything illegal. doing something illegal against something illegal doesnt make me feel vindicated.
close - but the real issue with guba is they are merely a simple and easy to use frontend to certain allowable newsgroups. Can't sue, they aren't doin the hosting - their just a newsgroup provider... and that's been a gray area since it's creation.
Programmer ICQ 44035273 | AIM spritwork | Email spritian at spritian dot com
close - but the real issue with guba is they are merely a simple and easy to use frontend to certain allowable newsgroups. Can't sue, they aren't doin the hosting - their just a newsgroup provider... and that's been a gray area since it's creation.
Actually, you CAN sue. They are clearly profiting from giving users access to content which is being used without the copyright holders' authorization. Get a few sponsors/content producers to band together, hire a few slick lawyers and GUBA is history.
Whitehat is for chumps
If you don't do it, somebody else will - true story!
if a few people with content on there DMCA and make abuse reports ccbill WILL stop processing them, i am VERY confident in that. don't ask me why, but i just know
they are truly scumbags, in xbiz's women of adult or porn I forget the exact name they had the chick who posts on here and works for that scumbag company. A company that makes money off of content that they have no rights too is considered part of our industry, only in adult.
if they pull content directly from usenet there really isnt anything you can do..
usenet is protected by laws that as long as the servers do not touch the content by request they can not be sued or some shit like that.
if were talking the same GUBA here, that shouldn't cover them... last i checked in on their scammy operation they were pulling content from the usenet and actually re-encoding it on the fly to different formats for download by their users, so the data was definitely hitting their servers and not just pointed to..
...promise her a defamation, tell her where the rain will fall..
Comment