-
-
Good, I may not like the smell of ballsack, but I don't fault those who do...Comment
-
It would really be wrong if this were about taxesMy inbox just blew up with newsletters on this and it really made my day
PS The only way being married gives someone a tax break is if their spouse makes way less than they do. Otherwise married people are generally in a higher bracket. This is about human rights, not money.
I know that it's not over, this will drag on for a while. I've had my constitutional rights thrown out a few times and I just learned to live with it, our system has a lot of flaws, most are in the political system
Do you really think I give a shit about anything that bitch is doing or has done? I don't care about the politics of this, I really don't. What I care about is someone whined and got a vote thrown out, I can only hope it gets changed in superior court, I like to know my vote means something. This is just like prop 187
LOL, Most people shouldn't get married, now if I'm dating someone and my daughter has say if I keep them or not, if she doesn't like her, out the door she goes, keeps me safe, Really confussed my last G/F, LMAOCarbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about thatComment
-
-
big day for fags and dykes. congrats.Comment
-
Want to crush it in mainstream with Facebook ads? Hit me up.Comment
-
Don't blame that on marriage, blame it on the morons who think they are ready and know the person well enough.Greed is Good
Comment
-
Vendzilla, what's more important to you? A modern majority vote, or upholding the constitution? Should the judge have ruled differently and went with the voters instead of the constitution?- Free Premium Domain Lists and Tools at Clickmojo.com
- For Sale: Obscenity.com
Comment
-
But you don't think the divorce rate makes a mockery of marriage in general? Don't those morons who rush to marry make marriage look like a shitty excuse for long-term commitment? No, right? Because people who actually legitimately use marriage for the purposes it was originally intended for shouldn't care about what other people do. Like gays and lesbians marrying.Want to crush it in mainstream with Facebook ads? Hit me up.Comment
-
You're using today's divorce rate for the entire concept of marriage. 50 years ago the divorce rate was much lower. In Judaism, it's around 2%. So marriage isn't the problem. I would love more stringent rules on marriage for everybody. What I don't agree with is same sex marriages. Nevermind the fact that there's nothing natural about homosexuality, but marriage has always and will always be defined as an agreement between a man and a woman. That won't change anytime soon, you'll see the Supreme Court's decision.Greed is GoodComment
-
Long ways to go yet. This case is destined for the US Supreme Court.
Comment
-
demon just finished his shift at wendy's and had a bad day. watch out.Comment
-
You give the founding fathers too much credit. They weren't psychic. If the world was still the way they made it and allowed, women wouldn't be able to vote and slavery would be legal. Blacks would be worth less than whites, etc... Civil rights in some of our lifetime changed all that. We should put this right too.- Free Premium Domain Lists and Tools at Clickmojo.com
- For Sale: Obscenity.com
Comment
-
this is great. now gays can suffer through marriage just like straight people!Image content management -- self-promoting image site script.
My ICQ #: 557262108
Email: ajacobs (at) uearning (dot) comComment
-
the word marriage scares me
Weekly Paying Affiliate Program with Dating Cam Offers!
TrafficGoldmine.com is the official home of HookUP.com
They offer payments by PayPal, Paxum, BTC, Bkash, Webmoney & more!Comment
-
What's the problem if Gays want to get married?
So if some bible toting State decided to imprison all non Christians that would be fine?Originally posted by Vendzilla
Or a Southern State voting slavery back in?Comment
-
-
Forgive me if I'm wrong here, but isn't that exactly why we have separation of powers? Because an idea(l) is popular does not always make it right. In this country, to my (sometimes lack of) understanding we have an executive branch to make decisions, a legislative branch to tell us what "everyone" thinks of these decisions and provide corrections, and a judicial branch to correct "everyone" when it becomes unpopular and further correct.
It's a flawed system, but it's what we've got, and I personally approve of basic rights being upheld EOD, such as in cases presented like this.
“I have the simplest tastes. I am always satisfied with the best.” -Oscar Wilde
Comment
-
They wrote the constitution. You said we should follow the constitution. I love it how the only argument someone can bring up against a same sex ban is "Well we had slavery and found out that was wrong!!!" Just because we made some mistakes in the past doesn't mean we're making a mistake now. What's right is to give homosexuals civil unions, and to keep marriage defined as being between a man and woman.Greed is GoodComment
-
-
-
There's absolutely no proof of that. It's an argument liberals definitely love to use because they need to blame religion while focusing on relativism.
And I'm not wrong regarding the constitution. What you said was right in theory, but it would have never been allowed by the founding fathers, which was the point.Greed is GoodComment
-
-
Yup because everybody is equal. There's no difference between a heterosexual couple and a homosexual couple, none whatsoever!Greed is GoodComment
-
the idea of marriage wont be as appealing once you stand in divorce court for the first time...Comment
-
Proposition 8 was designed to confuse people...it impacts us all.I am NOT Godaddy! Most excellent Domains & Cheap Hosting
“Buy an iPad, kill a Chinaman” - Brendan O’NeillComment
-
lol .... bla bla bla ....
Variation in divorce rates by religion:
Jews 30%
Born-again Christians 27%
Other Christians 24%
Atheists, Agnostics 21%
http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_dira.htm
must be a "liberal" source ...I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....Comment
-
Obviously it is not as cut and dried as that. Many observers believe the ruling will be overturned by the Supreme Court. There are lots of gray areas when it comes to "rights" and this is certainly one of them. Even when it involved a clearly defined right like the right to bear arms there was much debate over the meaning of the right and uncertainty about the way the court would decide. This case is not nearly as clear cut as that one and there is plenty of uncertainty about the final outcome.
бабки, шлюхи, силаComment
-
This is pretty 'cut and dried':Obviously it is not as cut and dried as that. Many observers believe the ruling will be overturned by the Supreme Court. There are lots of gray areas when it comes to "rights" and this is certainly one of them. Even when it involved a clearly defined right like the right to bear arms there was much debate over the meaning of the right and uncertainty about the way the court would decide. This case is not nearly as clear cut as that one and there is plenty of uncertainty about the final outcome.
Supreme Court must uphold. This isn't about gun control. This is about a certain group of people's basic rights guaranteed by the Constitution. You don't get to vote on that, no matter how homophobic someone may be.Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.SIG TOO BIGComment
-
Think that it gives one person too much power when they can over turn a vote from the majority that has happened two times
Apples and Oranges, this is rewriting the meaning of what marriage is
You only bring up guns because you know how I feel about them, most people that are against guns have never fired one. I had some of my best first dates going to a firing range and one of the people I shoot with is a lesbian
he was appointed by a conservative and he's gay, but then you're use to being wrong aren't you?Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about thatComment
-
Yeah well he applied strict scrutiny:
Although Proposition 8 fails to possess even a rational basis, the evidence presented at trial shows that gays and lesbians are the type of minority strict scrutiny was designed to protect.“The minimal evidentiary presentation made by proponents does not meet the heavy burden of production necessary to show that Proposition 8 is narrowly tailored to a compelling government interest. Proposition 8 cannot, therefore, withstand strict scrutiny.”I am NOT Godaddy! Most excellent Domains & Cheap Hosting
“Buy an iPad, kill a Chinaman” - Brendan O’NeillComment
-
1. Again, "the people" don't get to vote on basic rights provided by the constitution. It never should have been a vote in the first place.
2. That's why we have a judicial branch. Not just to put criminals in prison, but to challenge retarded laws that were voted on by the people (the majority voting on protected rights for a minority group) and laws that were poorly conceived by legislators. That's why it's called "checks & balances". The system worked exactly as it's supposed to.SIG TOO BIGComment
-
I agree. Its so ironic that the majority of people that call for "smaller government" also push for more imposing government regulations. We live in a land of contradiction.
Personally, I think the word marriage should be taken out of the arguement completely and everyone wanting to bond themselves to another individual should be documented as a "civil union"- hetero and same sex couples alike. So for instance you don't apply for a marriage license, you apply for a civil union license, etc. It's up to the couple if they want to call it marriage or not. Religion should be taken completely out of the equasion.
Start making money with the hottest hookup site!
up to $55 PPS or up to 75% Revshare
ICQ 196766477Comment
-
I am NOT Godaddy! Most excellent Domains & Cheap Hosting
“Buy an iPad, kill a Chinaman” - Brendan O’NeillComment
GFY Hall of Famer 
Comment