In 2010, how are we still stuck with this type of shit?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Brujah
    Beer Money Baron
    • Jan 2001
    • 22157

    #1

    In 2010, how are we still stuck with this type of shit?

    A Palestinian man has been convicted of rape after having consensual sex with a woman who had believed him to be a fellow Jew.
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010...ensual-sex-jew
  • Jdoughs
    Confirmed User
    • Mar 2004
    • 5794

    #2
    Damn, he slipped her a Jewfie.
    LinkSpun - Premier Adult Link Trading Community - ICQ - 464/\281/\250
    Be Seen By New Webmasters/Affiliates * Target out webmasters/affiliates based on niches your sites are for less than $20 a month.
    AmeriNOC - Proudly hosted @ AmeriNOC!

    Comment

    • Paul Markham
      Too old to care
      • Jun 2001
      • 52942

      #3


      Gideon Levy, a liberal Israeli commentator, was quoted as saying: "I would like to raise only one question with the judge. What if this guy had been a Jew who pretended to be a Muslim and had sex with a Muslim woman?

      "Would he have been convicted of rape? The answer is: of course not."



      Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
      PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

      Comment

      • seeandsee
        Check SIG!
        • Mar 2006
        • 50945

        #4
        He got flammed because poor sex
        BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year

        Contact here

        Comment

        • erooup
          Confirmed User
          • Jul 2010
          • 512

          #5
          Originally posted by Brujah
          A Palestinian man has been convicted of rape after having consensual sex with a woman who had believed him to be a fellow Jew.
          http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010...ensual-sex-jew
          Why? because of religion

          Comment

          • ottopottomouse
            She is ugly, bad luck.
            • Jan 2010
            • 13177

            #6
            Segal said: "The court is obliged to protect the public interest from sophisticated, smooth-tongued criminals who can deceive innocent victims at an unbearable price ? the sanctity of their bodies and souls. When the very basis of trust between human beings drops, especially when the matters at hand are so intimate, sensitive and fateful, the court is required to stand firmly at the side of the victims ? actual and potential ? to protect their wellbeing. Otherwise, they will be used, manipulated and misled, while paying only a tolerable and symbolic price."
            -Hi i'm a Jew can I get in your knickers?
            -Yes.

            Doesn't exactly make her sound very much like she was doing much to protect the sanctity of her body and soul.
            ↑ see post ↑
            13101

            Comment

            • LongBG
              Confirmed User
              • Jun 2007
              • 1101

              #7
              Fucked up,
              Contact me:
              [email protected]

              Comment

              Working...