Saddam had to be removed because he was resisting the New World Order.
Collapse
X
-
nice find....its all in front of peoples eyes....doubtful anything can be stopped now thoughTelegram PhoenixBrad
https://quantads.io -
-
"new world order" is just a phrase.you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..Comment
-
The biggest threat to the NWO is the armed American public. That's why they're trying to demonize gun owners and patriots. I used to think that Americans were gun crazed hill billies, but now I see them as our last hope.
Comment
-
-
In this context it is obviously being used as a figure of speech.. as in to imply there would be a "new world order" after deposing of Saddam. What else would you call it?
What is your assertion? That New World Order is a proper name? That Gordon Brown had just come out of his New World Order meeting and accidentally slipped up,, spilling the beans for all the world to see.. wow he must have been red in the face.
Cause you know... that's what they would call it - the super-secret master plan to enslave humanity.. they would definitely call it the "New World Order" just like how it's written about by Authors and Internet detectives... of all the names for the plan that is the one they would give it for sure.Last edited by Dollarmansteve; 07-21-2010, 07:12 AM.I died.Comment
-
Or..... they knew that's how the reasoning would go and by picking the most obvious name for their super-secret master-plan, people would come to this conclusion that it's just "too obvious", while they laugh heartily at their next NWO meeting. "Muuuaahahahaha!!"In this context it is obviously being used as a figure of speech.. as in to imply there would be a "new world order" after deposing of Saddam. What else would you call it?
What is your assertion? That New World Order is a proper name? That Gordon Brown had just come out of his New World Order meeting and accidentally slipped up,, spilling the beans for all the world to see.. wow he must have been red in the face.
Cause you know... that's what they would call it - the super-secret master plan to enslave humanity.. they would definitely call it the "New World Order" just like how it's written about by Authors and Internet detectives... of all the names for the plan that is the one they would give it for sure.SIG TOO BIGComment
-
Or maybe its a phrase for exactly what they want.. A New World Order. It's not a super-secret master plan. It's the world they have been building towards for many years now and if you resist them what you get is what happened in Iraq.In this context it is obviously being used as a figure of speech.. as in to imply there would be a "new world order" after deposing of Saddam. What else would you call it?
What is your assertion? That New World Order is a proper name? That Gordon Brown had just come out of his New World Order meeting and accidentally slipped up,, spilling the beans for all the world to see.. wow he must have been red in the face.
Cause you know... that's what they would call it - the super-secret master plan to enslave humanity.. they would definitely call it the "New World Order" just like how it's written about by Authors and Internet detectives... of all the names for the plan that is the one they would give it for sure.
Comment
-
they went after him because he continually refused to take loans from their banksComment
-
-
Saddam was the convenient ''bad guy'' or whipping boy to avenge 9/11. Much as Hitler's invasion of Poland was to rally public support ...
Had the US concentrated on Afghanistan, whose invasion was justified, IMHO ? continued to ''contain'' Saddam's Iraq at a cost of $12 Billion/yr ... How much did the invasion of Iraq cost ? $500 Billion?
For $120 Billion by now, containment might have achieved the same result in Iraq at about 25% of the cost.
That $400 Billion must be paid somehow. How? The housing market was used, abused then busted, then crisis and the financial mess that we have today.
Saddam got his revenge ultimately and a substantial part of the world sees him as a martyr to American Imperialism ? just what did the US and its allies win?
Dirty deeds done not so cheap ...Comment
-
Ya but if they knew they you knew that they would know that people would know that, then would they know not to use that name?Or..... they knew that's how the reasoning would go and by picking the most obvious name for their super-secret master-plan, people would come to this conclusion that it's just "too obvious", while they laugh heartily at their next NWO meeting. "Muuuaahahahaha!!"I died.Comment
-
Comment
-
Hmmm, probably not because they have no way of knowing that we know that they knew that people would know, unless they knew that we also would know that they have no way of knowing that! Those sneaky bastards! Well, the jig's up now because now we know.SIG TOO BIGComment
-
That's pretty funny, but these nwo people don't give a shit if we know what they're up to anymore. They know most think it's just a big kooky conspiracy. The rest don't give a shit because they're content with the status quo. They got their sports, beer and affliction t-shit and life is good. I guess if this is what the people want they'll get it. To me this nwo they have in the works looks like a ultra-reactionary, hyper-capitalist, authoritarian police state.
Comment
-
Yeah the US put him in there. Economics. They tried to take him out in early 90s and take control of Iraq. Then he still wasnt doing what they wanted him to do. So they tried to kill him a bunch of times throughout the 90s, he was very agile and good at dodging "jackals".
Until finally, got the real chance in early 2000s (right after 9/11) and did it.Jackals are CIA-sanctioned people that come in and try to foment a coup or revolution. If that doesn’t work, they perform assassinations—or try to. In the case of Iraq, they weren’t able to get through to Saddam Hussein… His bodyguards were too good. He had doubles. They couldn’t get through to him. So the third line of defense, if the economic hit men and the jackals fail, the next line of defense is our young men and women, who are sent in to die and kill, which is what we’ve obviously done in Iraq.
Still have no idea why we went into Iraq after 9/11 ? What was the connection? LMAO ;)Last edited by D Ghost; 07-21-2010, 11:00 AM.Comment
-
LOL. Genius!Or..... they knew that's how the reasoning would go and by picking the most obvious name for their super-secret master-plan, people would come to this conclusion that it's just "too obvious", while they laugh heartily at their next NWO meeting. "Muuuaahahahaha!!"Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted
Windows VPS now available
Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.
Click here for more details.Comment
-
No matter what, I think we can agree that the consequences will never be the same.I died.Comment
-

BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year

Comment