Saddam had to be removed because he was resisting the New World Order.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Martin
    "Assassins"
    • Dec 2001
    • 17278

    #1

    Saddam had to be removed because he was resisting the New World Order.

  • Phoenix
    BACON BACON BACON
    • Nov 2002
    • 35475

    #2
    nice find....its all in front of peoples eyes....doubtful anything can be stopped now though
    Telegram PhoenixBrad
    https://quantads.io

    Comment

    • CaptainHowdy
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Dec 2004
      • 94744

      #3
      Just passing by...

      Comment

      • BlackCrayon
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Jun 2003
        • 19634

        #4
        "new world order" is just a phrase.
        you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..

        Comment

        • Martin
          "Assassins"
          • Dec 2001
          • 17278

          #5
          Originally posted by Phoenix
          nice find....its all in front of peoples eyes....doubtful anything can be stopped now though
          The biggest threat to the NWO is the armed American public. That's why they're trying to demonize gun owners and patriots. I used to think that Americans were gun crazed hill billies, but now I see them as our last hope.

          Comment

          • Martin
            "Assassins"
            • Dec 2001
            • 17278

            #6
            Originally posted by BlackCrayon
            "new world order" is just a phrase.
            phrase for what?

            Comment

            • cherrylula
              lol
              • Jan 2002
              • 15969

              #7
              well duh lol

              Comment

              • Dollarmansteve
                Confirmed User
                • May 2005
                • 2849

                #8
                Originally posted by Martin
                phrase for what?
                In this context it is obviously being used as a figure of speech.. as in to imply there would be a "new world order" after deposing of Saddam. What else would you call it?

                What is your assertion? That New World Order is a proper name? That Gordon Brown had just come out of his New World Order meeting and accidentally slipped up,, spilling the beans for all the world to see.. wow he must have been red in the face.

                Cause you know... that's what they would call it - the super-secret master plan to enslave humanity.. they would definitely call it the "New World Order" just like how it's written about by Authors and Internet detectives... of all the names for the plan that is the one they would give it for sure.
                Last edited by Dollarmansteve; 07-21-2010, 07:12 AM.
                I died.

                Comment

                • Amputate Your Head
                  There can be only one
                  • Aug 2001
                  • 39075

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Dollarmansteve
                  In this context it is obviously being used as a figure of speech.. as in to imply there would be a "new world order" after deposing of Saddam. What else would you call it?

                  What is your assertion? That New World Order is a proper name? That Gordon Brown had just come out of his New World Order meeting and accidentally slipped up,, spilling the beans for all the world to see.. wow he must have been red in the face.

                  Cause you know... that's what they would call it - the super-secret master plan to enslave humanity.. they would definitely call it the "New World Order" just like how it's written about by Authors and Internet detectives... of all the names for the plan that is the one they would give it for sure.
                  Or..... they knew that's how the reasoning would go and by picking the most obvious name for their super-secret master-plan, people would come to this conclusion that it's just "too obvious", while they laugh heartily at their next NWO meeting. "Muuuaahahahaha!!"
                  SIG TOO BIG

                  Comment

                  • Martin
                    "Assassins"
                    • Dec 2001
                    • 17278

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Dollarmansteve
                    In this context it is obviously being used as a figure of speech.. as in to imply there would be a "new world order" after deposing of Saddam. What else would you call it?

                    What is your assertion? That New World Order is a proper name? That Gordon Brown had just come out of his New World Order meeting and accidentally slipped up,, spilling the beans for all the world to see.. wow he must have been red in the face.

                    Cause you know... that's what they would call it - the super-secret master plan to enslave humanity.. they would definitely call it the "New World Order" just like how it's written about by Authors and Internet detectives... of all the names for the plan that is the one they would give it for sure.
                    Or maybe its a phrase for exactly what they want.. A New World Order. It's not a super-secret master plan. It's the world they have been building towards for many years now and if you resist them what you get is what happened in Iraq.

                    Comment

                    • seeandsee
                      Check SIG!
                      • Mar 2006
                      • 50945

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Martin
                      who cares, what is done is done...
                      BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year

                      Contact here

                      Comment

                      • rabbit
                        Confirmed User
                        • Jul 2003
                        • 2124

                        #12
                        they went after him because he continually refused to take loans from their banks

                        Got a paysite? Get it reviewed by RabbitsReviews and TheBestPorn

                        Comment

                        • Martin
                          "Assassins"
                          • Dec 2001
                          • 17278

                          #13


                          "When we are successful.. And we will be"

                          Comment

                          • cwd
                            Confirmed User
                            • Feb 2006
                            • 1955

                            #14
                            nwo rocks!

                            Comment

                            • Phoenix
                              BACON BACON BACON
                              • Nov 2002
                              • 35475

                              #15
                              Originally posted by rabbit
                              they went after him because he continually refused to take loans from their banks
                              luckily greece fell in line...and spain next
                              Telegram PhoenixBrad
                              https://quantads.io

                              Comment

                              • Barry-xlovecam
                                It's 42
                                • Jun 2010
                                • 18083

                                #16
                                Saddam was the convenient ''bad guy'' or whipping boy to avenge 9/11. Much as Hitler's invasion of Poland was to rally public support ...

                                Had the US concentrated on Afghanistan, whose invasion was justified, IMHO ? continued to ''contain'' Saddam's Iraq at a cost of $12 Billion/yr ... How much did the invasion of Iraq cost ? $500 Billion?

                                For $120 Billion by now, containment might have achieved the same result in Iraq at about 25% of the cost.

                                That $400 Billion must be paid somehow. How? The housing market was used, abused then busted, then crisis and the financial mess that we have today.

                                Saddam got his revenge ultimately and a substantial part of the world sees him as a martyr to American Imperialism ? just what did the US and its allies win?

                                Dirty deeds done not so cheap ...

                                Comment

                                • Dollarmansteve
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • May 2005
                                  • 2849

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Amputate Your Head
                                  Or..... they knew that's how the reasoning would go and by picking the most obvious name for their super-secret master-plan, people would come to this conclusion that it's just "too obvious", while they laugh heartily at their next NWO meeting. "Muuuaahahahaha!!"
                                  Ya but if they knew they you knew that they would know that people would know that, then would they know not to use that name?
                                  I died.

                                  Comment

                                  • _Richard_
                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                    • Oct 2006
                                    • 30991

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by Martin
                                    The biggest threat to the NWO is the armed American public. That's why they're trying to demonize gun owners and patriots. I used to think that Americans were gun crazed hill billies, but now I see them as our last hope.
                                    know what you mean

                                    Comment

                                    • Amputate Your Head
                                      There can be only one
                                      • Aug 2001
                                      • 39075

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by Dollarmansteve
                                      Ya but if they knew they you knew that they would know that people would know that, then would they know not to use that name?
                                      Hmmm, probably not because they have no way of knowing that we know that they knew that people would know, unless they knew that we also would know that they have no way of knowing that! Those sneaky bastards! Well, the jig's up now because now we know.
                                      SIG TOO BIG

                                      Comment

                                      • Martin
                                        "Assassins"
                                        • Dec 2001
                                        • 17278

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Amputate Your Head
                                        Hmmm, probably not because they have no way of knowing that we know that they knew that people would know, unless they knew that we also would know that they have no way of knowing that! Those sneaky bastards! Well, the jig's up now because now we know.
                                        That's pretty funny, but these nwo people don't give a shit if we know what they're up to anymore. They know most think it's just a big kooky conspiracy. The rest don't give a shit because they're content with the status quo. They got their sports, beer and affliction t-shit and life is good. I guess if this is what the people want they'll get it. To me this nwo they have in the works looks like a ultra-reactionary, hyper-capitalist, authoritarian police state.

                                        Comment

                                        • D Ghost
                                          null
                                          • May 2006
                                          • 9820

                                          #21
                                          what saddam is dead?!?!?!?!
                                          Last edited by D Ghost; 07-21-2010, 10:57 AM.

                                          Comment

                                          • D Ghost
                                            null
                                            • May 2006
                                            • 9820

                                            #22
                                            Yeah the US put him in there. Economics. They tried to take him out in early 90s and take control of Iraq. Then he still wasnt doing what they wanted him to do. So they tried to kill him a bunch of times throughout the 90s, he was very agile and good at dodging "jackals".

                                            Jackals are CIA-sanctioned people that come in and try to foment a coup or revolution. If that doesn’t work, they perform assassinations—or try to. In the case of Iraq, they weren’t able to get through to Saddam Hussein… His bodyguards were too good. He had doubles. They couldn’t get through to him. So the third line of defense, if the economic hit men and the jackals fail, the next line of defense is our young men and women, who are sent in to die and kill, which is what we’ve obviously done in Iraq.
                                            Until finally, got the real chance in early 2000s (right after 9/11) and did it.

                                            Still have no idea why we went into Iraq after 9/11 ? What was the connection? LMAO ;)
                                            Last edited by D Ghost; 07-21-2010, 11:00 AM.

                                            Comment

                                            • Sly
                                              Let's do some business!
                                              • Sep 2004
                                              • 31377

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by Amputate Your Head
                                              Or..... they knew that's how the reasoning would go and by picking the most obvious name for their super-secret master-plan, people would come to this conclusion that it's just "too obvious", while they laugh heartily at their next NWO meeting. "Muuuaahahahaha!!"
                                              LOL. Genius!
                                              Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted

                                              Windows VPS now available
                                              Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.
                                              Click here for more details.

                                              Comment

                                              • D Ghost
                                                null
                                                • May 2006
                                                • 9820

                                                #24
                                                read my post above people ^^

                                                Comment

                                                • Dollarmansteve
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • May 2005
                                                  • 2849

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by Amputate Your Head
                                                  Hmmm, probably not because they have no way of knowing that we know that they knew that people would know, unless they knew that we also would know that they have no way of knowing that! Those sneaky bastards! Well, the jig's up now because now we know.
                                                  No matter what, I think we can agree that the consequences will never be the same.
                                                  I died.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • PGR
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Jul 2004
                                                    • 1753

                                                    #26
                                                    we are borg

                                                    resistance is futile
                                                    DomainRaider - PGRDomains
                                                    sales AT pgrdomains DOT com

                                                    Comment

                                                    Working...