New Document posted on ICANN website re. .XXX - final decision in 10 days ???

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • polish_aristocrat
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Jul 2002
    • 40377

    #1

    New Document posted on ICANN website re. .XXX - final decision in 10 days ???

    Responce from Vint Cerf, ICANN Board Chairman to Mohamed Sharil Tarmizi, Chairman of GAC (Government Advisory Committee)

    letter in PDF so I can't quote it, but it suggests that a final decision regarding .XXX can be expected at the public ICANN meeting in Lisbon, 26-30 March

    http://icann.org/correspondence/cerf...ns-14Mar07.pdf
    I don't use ICQ anymore.
  • PHP-CODER-FOR-HIRE
    Confirmed User
    • Nov 2006
    • 1090

    #2
    Wow... we're down to crunch time now.

    Comment

    • BoyAlley
      So Fucking Gay
      • Nov 2004
      • 19714

      #3
      Originally posted by PHP-CODER-FOR-HIRE
      Wow... we're down to crunch time now.
      I know it's getting scurry...........

      Hopefully we'll have good news! (aka the gawd damn thing is killed dead once and for all)

      Comment

      • JFK
        FUBAR the ORIGINATOR
        • Jan 2002
        • 67369

        #4
        Originally posted by BoyAlley
        I know it's getting scurry...........

        Hopefully we'll have good news! (aka the gawd damn thing is killed dead once and for all)
        Amen to dat

        FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
        For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

        Comment

        • CyberHustler
          Masterbaiter
          • Feb 2006
          • 28788

          #5
          Fuck .XXX
          “If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”

          Comment

          • StarkReality
            Confirmed User
            • May 2004
            • 4444

            #6
            Originally posted by BoyAlley
            I know it's getting scurry...........

            Hopefully we'll have good news! (aka the gawd damn thing is killed dead once and for all)
            Yep, and let's pray it doesn't become a zombie !

            Comment

            • Nikki_Licks
              Confirmed User
              • May 2005
              • 6323

              #7
              Originally posted by BoyAlley
              I know it's getting scurry...........

              Hopefully we'll have good news! (aka the gawd damn thing is killed dead once and for all)
              Fuck .XXX
              Amateur Content
              ICQ: 292 356 077

              Comment

              • Nikki_Licks
                Confirmed User
                • May 2005
                • 6323

                #8
                Bump to the top.....
                Amateur Content
                ICQ: 292 356 077

                Comment

                • davecummings
                  Confirmed User
                  • Oct 2003
                  • 2922

                  #9
                  .xxx should be stamped out once and for all---the REAL "Sponsored Community" does not want it.
                  Dave Cummings
                  www.davecummings.com
                  www.davecummings.tv
                  San Diego

                  Email--- [email protected]

                  Comment

                  • Rhesus
                    Confirmed User
                    • Aug 2004
                    • 2009

                    #10
                    Is Joan from the FSC going to Lisbon for this?

                    Comment

                    • Star 69
                      Confirmed User
                      • Nov 2005
                      • 8602

                      #11
                      will wait till 26-30 of March
                      e-mail star69

                      Comment

                      • vicki
                        Confirmed User
                        • Feb 2002
                        • 1478

                        #12
                        I see its on the agenda for Lisbon but dunno about a final decision. Does it seem to anyone else that ICANN is waiting to see what GAC's decides?

                        Just musing but if the adult industry started it's own business committee (who are representative of the community) it would make sense that ANY outside body would be forced to work with them on issues such as this. I know I've suggested it before and gotten slammed but .... well it seems obvious that it would've come in handy here.
                        If at first you do succeed - try to hide your astonishment.

                        HR merchant accounts from 3.45%
                        solid biz since 98
                        victoriakozub AT gmail.com
                        skype: victoria.kozub | ICQ: 74296746

                        Comment

                        • Connor
                          Confirmed User
                          • Feb 2003
                          • 1294

                          #13
                          Now that ICANN has been alerted to the fact that webmasters don't want this, I just can't see how they would vote to approve .XXX at this point. I mean I suppose anything is possible when politics are in the equation, but I was heartened by the minutes of their last discussion on .XXX and feel that since they are paying attention, it will be EASY to see the level of opposition and lack of support. Let's hope this issue FINALLY goes away.


                          YNOT v5 IS NOW LIVE! | SEEN YNOT MAIL YET?

                          Comment

                          • Juilan
                            Sultan of Swing
                            • Feb 2004
                            • 15141

                            #14
                            THE FINAL COUNTDOWN dada da da
                            My Best Converting VOD Sponsor |

                            Comment

                            • polish_aristocrat
                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 40377

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Connor
                              Now that ICANN has been alerted to the fact that webmasters don't want this, I just can't see how they would vote to approve .XXX at this point. I mean I suppose anything is possible when politics are in the equation, but I was heartened by the minutes of their last discussion on .XXX and feel that since they are paying attention, it will be EASY to see the level of opposition and lack of support. Let's hope this issue FINALLY goes away.
                              unfortunately ICM has submitted new documents showing that webmasters supposedly want .xxx

                              btw, minutes from the last ICANN meeting will be available today or tommorow...
                              I don't use ICQ anymore.

                              Comment

                              • Tickler
                                Confirmed User
                                • Jul 2005
                                • 650

                                #16
                                Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
                                unfortunately ICM has submitted new documents showing that webmasters supposedly want .xxx
                                But, if you look closely at their documentation, and their responses at Xbix seminar:

                                Their definition of sponsored community, only includes WMs that want .XXX as a TLD. The rest of us don't count in their eyes.
                                Big Sister Live - Live sex club paid in Euros

                                Why all the PSYCHIC ads in the papers, and on TV?
                                Makes $$$s on the web @ Psychic Access

                                Comment

                                • vicki
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Feb 2002
                                  • 1478

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Tickler
                                  But, if you look closely at their documentation, and their responses at Xbix seminar:

                                  Their definition of sponsored community, only includes WMs that want .XXX as a TLD. The rest of us don't count in their eyes.
                                  Exactly my point, we have no figurehead committee to be the voice for our industry. We don't have an entity that represents our cohesive majorities .. because of this we're an easyier target for all.

                                  Consider this .. if the adult industry DID have such a committee, that committee's voice would have shot ICM's application down from the start as it represents their 'sponsored community'.
                                  If at first you do succeed - try to hide your astonishment.

                                  HR merchant accounts from 3.45%
                                  solid biz since 98
                                  victoriakozub AT gmail.com
                                  skype: victoria.kozub | ICQ: 74296746

                                  Comment

                                  • tony299
                                    lurker
                                    • Aug 2002
                                    • 57021

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by vicki
                                    Exactly my point, we have no figurehead committee to be the voice for our industry. We don't have an entity that represents our cohesive majorities .. because of this we're an easyier target for all.

                                    Consider this .. if the adult industry DID have such a committee, that committee's voice would have shot ICM's application down from the start as it represents their 'sponsored community'.
                                    you are very right

                                    Comment

                                    • FightThisPatent
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Aug 2003
                                      • 4090

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by vicki
                                      Exactly my point, we have no figurehead committee to be the voice for our industry. We don't have an entity that represents our cohesive majorities .. because of this we're an easyier target for all.


                                      that's not true.. FSC represents over 3,000+ webmasters who are their members, and have been very vocal against .XXX

                                      If you are not an FSC member, then your statement is true.. .you don't have a figurehead committee that voices your concern.

                                      The 'sponsored community' has been defined in the application as basically any adult webmaster that wants labeling and wants .XXX

                                      This is how ICM is pushing ICANN to adopt .XXX because it claims it passed the definition of the community, because there are supposedly 24 companies in adult that wrote in support and over 1,500 adult webmasters writing to them (yeah right), and over 76,000 domains pre-registered (they didn't disclose how many were unique businesses signing up and also, those were done as defensive moves, not to be counted as voting of a yes).

                                      The latest ICM documents to ICANN are up there to try and discredit the opposition to show that only a few are causing noise, and that they do have some level of representation.

                                      There is opposition work going on.. and FSC is definitely involved.


                                      Fight the 411!

                                      http://www.t3report.com
                                      (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
                                      http://www.FightThePatent.com
                                      | ICQ 52741957

                                      Comment

                                      • vicki
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Feb 2002
                                        • 1478

                                        #20
                                        I understand what you are saying Brandon and the FSC is an awesome group - but the truth of the matter is that the FSC represents Freedom of Speech.

                                        Although many of its members are from the adult industry, the entity is not limited to voicing for the adult industry alone.

                                        What I'm saying is there needs to be an adult industry leadership committee that is solely developed for the furtherment of 'adult'.
                                        Of course the two working together would be an added bonus.

                                        Nobody here is trying to rain on the FSC group's valant efforts.
                                        If at first you do succeed - try to hide your astonishment.

                                        HR merchant accounts from 3.45%
                                        solid biz since 98
                                        victoriakozub AT gmail.com
                                        skype: victoria.kozub | ICQ: 74296746

                                        Comment

                                        • FightThisPatent
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Aug 2003
                                          • 4090

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by vicki
                                          Although many of its members are from the adult industry, the entity is not limited to voicing for the adult industry alone.

                                          i understand your point, but other than FSC, there isn't much other hope for cohesiveness.. the popular phrase "herding cats" will come up.

                                          Ironically, ICM/IFFOR is saying what you are asking for.. They are saying that they would represent interests of adult since they believe they would have a large number of companies using .XXX that gives them a larger number of constituents to show to whomever (congress, visa, mc, etc).

                                          But the problem with that pipe dream, is that the majority vote on IFFOR does not belong to adult, so the expectation that non-adult people will know what's best for adult?!?!?1


                                          Fight the .XXX!

                                          http://www.t3report.com
                                          (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
                                          http://www.FightThePatent.com
                                          | ICQ 52741957

                                          Comment

                                          Working...