Flowplayer + Lighttpd = Pseudostreaming

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TheSenator
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Feb 2003
    • 13330

    #1

    Flowplayer + Lighttpd = Pseudostreaming

    I finally configured a local server to serve my streaming FLV files. The surfer can seek the timeline at any time while watching the FLV movie.

    This is extremely useful if you plan to have a tube site.

    Now, I just need my sys admin to set-up lighttpd on a separate server so that I can serve FLV movies.


    http://flowplayer.org/plugins/stream...streaming.html
    ISeekGirls.com since 2005
  • MaDalton
    I am Amazing Content!
    • Feb 2004
    • 39861

    #2
    also works with a apache module: http://h264.code-shop.com/trac

    no extra server needed
    AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
    Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
    Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
    Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

    Comment

    • sortie
      Confirmed User
      • Mar 2007
      • 7771

      #3
      Originally posted by TheSenator
      I finally configured a local server to serve my streaming FLV files. The surfer can seek the timeline at any time while watching the FLV movie.

      This is extremely useful if you plan to have a tube site.

      Now, I just need my sys admin to set-up lighttpd on a separate server so that I can serve FLV movies.


      http://flowplayer.org/plugins/stream...streaming.html
      I thought seeking the timeline without wait time was only capable using mp4 instead of
      flv.

      Are you sure of this???

      Edit: Just checked it out and yeah, works with FLVs
      Last edited by sortie; 06-18-2010, 04:18 PM.

      Comment

      • MaDalton
        I am Amazing Content!
        • Feb 2004
        • 39861

        #4
        Originally posted by sortie
        I thought seeking the timeline without wait time was only capable using mp4 instead of
        flv.

        Are you sure of this???

        Edit: Just checked it out and yeah, works with FLVs
        i'd like to know whats the benefit of using flv when it's actually nothing else than mp4 with extra features that no one uses anyways.
        AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
        Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
        Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
        Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

        Comment

        • VGeorgie
          Confirmed User
          • Nov 2008
          • 359

          #5
          Originally posted by sortie
          Edit: Just checked it out and yeah, works with FLVs
          Yes on FLVs but be sure to process the clip through a metadata injector (flvtool2, yamdi, etc.) that inserts the keyframe and byte offset objects. Encoders like FFmpeg do not automatically add metadata to this extent.

          Comment

          • FiReC
            Confirmed User
            • Jan 2002
            • 2350

            #6
            Originally posted by VGeorgie
            Yes on FLVs but be sure to process the clip through a metadata injector (flvtool2, yamdi, etc.) that inserts the keyframe and byte offset objects. Encoders like FFmpeg do not automatically add metadata to this extent.
            ffmpeg started doing this over a year ago on flvs....
            www.nubilefilms.com | www.nubiles.net | www.anilos.com | tubescript.nubiles.net | icq4162727

            Comment

            • TheSenator
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Feb 2003
              • 13330

              #7
              Originally posted by VGeorgie
              Yes on FLVs but be sure to process the clip through a metadata injector (flvtool2, yamdi, etc.) that inserts the keyframe and byte offset objects. Encoders like FFmpeg do not automatically add metadata to this extent.
              I use FLV MetaData Injector GUI 1.05 for Windows.
              Work good if you are cutting your own videos.

              http://www.buraks.com/flvmdi/
              ISeekGirls.com since 2005

              Comment

              • TheSenator
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Feb 2003
                • 13330

                #8
                Originally posted by MaDalton
                also works with a apache module: http://h264.code-shop.com/trac

                no extra server needed
                I went with LIGHTTPD because I wanted to keep my server load down. I am actually just getting a web server for videos.
                ISeekGirls.com since 2005

                Comment

                • sortie
                  Confirmed User
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 7771

                  #9
                  Originally posted by MaDalton
                  i'd like to know whats the benefit of using flv when it's actually nothing else than mp4 with extra features that no one uses anyways.
                  The most benefit was that flv was the official Flash Video format.

                  So since the video player is made in Flash, flvs were the option.

                  Other video formats can't be played in a flash player except mp4.

                  Comment

                  • sandman!
                    Icq: 14420613
                    • Mar 2001
                    • 15427

                    #10
                    sorry but only an idiot would use apache to stream vids.

                    everyone uses wowza / flashmedia player / red5 / light http

                    apache sucks ass for content delivery its only good for scripts and low traffic sites.


                    Originally posted by MaDalton
                    also works with a apache module: http://h264.code-shop.com/trac

                    no extra server needed
                    Need WebHosting ? Email me for some great deals [email protected]

                    Comment

                    • TheSenator
                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                      • Feb 2003
                      • 13330

                      #11
                      Originally posted by sandman!
                      sorry but only an idiot would use apache to stream vids.

                      everyone uses wowza / flashmedia player / red5 / light http

                      apache sucks ass for content delivery its only good for scripts and low traffic sites.

                      My sys admin is going to run both on one server. Apache and Lighttpd working together
                      ISeekGirls.com since 2005

                      Comment

                      • VGeorgie
                        Confirmed User
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 359

                        #12
                        Originally posted by FiReC
                        ffmpeg started doing this over a year ago on flvs....
                        That's news to me, and I've been testing the latest builds.

                        Is there a switch that does this? Frankly, I'm surprised FFmpeg bothers with the extended metadata as their support for FLV has never been it's strong suit, despite every tube site using it.

                        Comment

                        • VGeorgie
                          Confirmed User
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 359

                          #13
                          Originally posted by MaDalton
                          i'd like to know whats the benefit of using flv when it's actually nothing else than mp4 with extra features that no one uses anyways.
                          The only "MP4" Flash supports is H.264 in an MP4 container. Some people use "MP4" to mean MPEG-4, and Flash doesn't support that.

                          FLV is quite different from MPEG-4 and H.264. You use FLV when you want compatibility with versions of Flash Player prior to Version 9 Update 3 (also referred to as v9 r115). Anything earlier will not play H.264. Adobe does not volunteer penetration percentages for updates within versions, but in my experience, it's something like 10% of the general population that has a version prior to v9r115.

                          Comment

                          • VGeorgie
                            Confirmed User
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 359

                            #14
                            Originally posted by sandman!
                            sorry but only an idiot would use apache to stream vids.

                            everyone uses wowza / flashmedia player / red5 / light http

                            apache sucks ass for content delivery its only good for scripts and low traffic sites.
                            Like TheSenator says, Lighttpd is doing the video serving. Apache is used for anything else on the page.

                            The following page demonstrates Flowplayer fetching pseudo content from a CDN, plus fallback if H.264 is not supported by the user's version of Flash.

                            http://flowplayer.org/demos/plugins/...streaming.html

                            For anyone else wanting to do this, do keep in mind that pseudostreaming is effectively just like progressive download, that is, once the download begins at X point, it proceeds until either the video is completely downloaded, or the surfer goes to another point in the timeline, or he switches to a different page. It's not like true streaming, where the server will stream only so much at a time, then stop.

                            Comment

                            • cgiGeek
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jan 2002
                              • 203

                              #15
                              we have at xxxhostit.com nginx streaming flv with flowplayer in members area via joomla and apache for scripts for quite sometime now, i do love the setup (i do love lighttpd as well tho )
                              Need help dealing with a hacked website? Contact me via icq 163583431 :D
                              Premium Bandwidth Managed Servers, 12 Years in business xxxHOSTit.com
                              I work for xxxhostit.com

                              Comment

                              • stonehammer
                                Confirmed User
                                • Feb 2008
                                • 1430

                                #16
                                hello...

                                do you guys know the best way to serve picture content ?

                                light http, nginx...or something else ??
                                GFY Educational Series: Buying Skimmed Traffic for Websites

                                Comment

                                • MaDalton
                                  I am Amazing Content!
                                  • Feb 2004
                                  • 39861

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by sandman!
                                  sorry but only an idiot would use apache to stream vids.

                                  everyone uses wowza / flashmedia player / red5 / light http

                                  apache sucks ass for content delivery its only good for scripts and low traffic sites.
                                  then i am probably an idiot, remind me next time when i buy a link from you

                                  although i doubt there will be a next time after my last experience
                                  Last edited by MaDalton; 06-19-2010, 05:20 AM.
                                  AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
                                  Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
                                  Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
                                  Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

                                  Comment

                                  Working...