Quote:
Originally Posted by sortie
What you said makes sense for a person who can only process one nugget of logic
at a time.
The rest of us can see the whole story without taking one part of the story
and then burying our head in the sand about the rest of the story.
You think the "rest of the story" is an excuse; but it's just the "rest of the story".
Also, you should know that the US criminal law systems does allow for "mitigating circumstances" in determining the action on a crime.
His life events may or may not be a "mitigating circumstance".
But you can't deem it either way without hearing the WHOLE story first.
|
i am not sure why you had to make this personal. fact is, we are all free to interpret the author's opinion. i recall from college many heated debates while critiquing required reading in class discussion, thank god the instructor was present to keep it civil so i am familiar with how discussion like this can get personal quickly.
you are free to continue to make this about my *perceived* lack of ability to process information if you like, i should not of gotten hooked in and made my comment to you about your missing the conclusion, for that i apologize.
