Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
you obviously failed to either read the conclusion, or comprehend it.
i said the editorial is fucked and i stand by that. people can wonder all they want but the fact is he murdered that person, not the porn bidness, not his mama, not the way he was raised, not his fucking 3rd grade teacher.
|
What you said makes sense for a person who can only process one nugget of logic
at a time.
The rest of us can see the whole story without taking one part of the story
and then burying our head in the sand about the rest of the story.
You think the "rest of the story" is an excuse; but it's just the "rest of the story".
Also, you should know that the US criminal law systems does allow for "mitigating circumstances" in determining the action on a crime.
His life events may or may not be a "mitigating circumstance".
But you can't deem it either way without hearing the
WHOLE story first.