WTF? spamarrest charging to have emails sent to their customers!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • webmasterchecks
    Confirmed User
    • Oct 2006
    • 1685

    #1

    WTF? spamarrest charging to have emails sent to their customers!

    i sent like 10 emails to spamarrest customers before i got this message. really pisses me off, im not going to fuckin pay it and the last 5 guys are not going to get their email

    be warned if you use spamarrest, the burden is on you



    Webmasterchecks Affiliate Payments - fully compatible with nats/mpa3
  • polish_aristocrat
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Jul 2002
    • 40377

    #2
    .bmp file?
    I don't use ICQ anymore.

    Comment

    • webmasterchecks
      Confirmed User
      • Oct 2006
      • 1685

      #3
      Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
      .bmp file?
      lol you geek

      did screenshot, put into ms paint, edited and cropped, saved, uploaded

      im not a designer
      Webmasterchecks Affiliate Payments - fully compatible with nats/mpa3

      Comment

      • webmasterchecks
        Confirmed User
        • Oct 2006
        • 1685

        #4
        Originally posted by pornopete
        wtf? Is that what YOU get when you try to send an email to one of their customers?

        yes, that is correct
        Webmasterchecks Affiliate Payments - fully compatible with nats/mpa3

        Comment

        • rowan
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Mar 2002
          • 17393

          #5
          Do they disclose that they require this extra charge/step, to the customers who are using the spamarrest service to protect their mails?

          Comment

          • Tat2Jr
            Confirmed User
            • Feb 2001
            • 4882

            #6
            Wow.... lots of people ain't getting my emails if I hit my limit. Fuck 'em. Thunderbird works just fine.
            NICHE MONEY >> Ass Worship • Panties • Solo Teen • Pantyhose
            Serving up exclusive fetish sites since 1997!

            Comment

            • webmasterchecks
              Confirmed User
              • Oct 2006
              • 1685

              #7
              increase the awareness bump
              Webmasterchecks Affiliate Payments - fully compatible with nats/mpa3

              Comment

              • RawAlex
                So Fucking Banned
                • Oct 2003
                • 9465

                #8
                Here's the thing. You shouldn't be performing a high number of verifications. That is a sign that you are sending unwanted emails. Programs I sign up for I approve as they come into the spamarrest system, and they never have an issue.

                The only one that would have an issue would be someone trying to spam an email list with a new program, or otherwise make contact with people on a bulk basis that they haven't had contact with before.

                Comment

                • webmasterchecks
                  Confirmed User
                  • Oct 2006
                  • 1685

                  #9
                  Originally posted by RawAlex
                  Here's the thing. You shouldn't be performing a high number of verifications. That is a sign that you are sending unwanted emails. Programs I sign up for I approve as they come into the spamarrest system, and they never have an issue.

                  The only one that would have an issue would be someone trying to spam an email list with a new program, or otherwise make contact with people on a bulk basis that they haven't had contact with before.
                  there are very legitimate reasons why i could want to do this, we are in the webmaster community so spamblockers are common and we are talking 10 or so before it blocked me.

                  but if i pay, i can send them through. so its not a protection issue, otherwise they simply wouldn't allow it, its a revenue issue
                  Webmasterchecks Affiliate Payments - fully compatible with nats/mpa3

                  Comment

                  • Quick Buck
                    Confirmed User
                    • Feb 2006
                    • 1026

                    #10
                    i think this kind of defeats the purpose of spamarrest.

                    you're not supposed to verify yourself if you're sending bulk e-mail... bulk e-mail is supposed to be approved by the spamarrest subscriber.
                    $50 FREE TRIALS! Every Day til 2008!!!
                    Only at QuickBuck

                    Comment

                    • webmasterchecks
                      Confirmed User
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 1685

                      #11
                      Originally posted by RawAlex
                      Here's the thing. You shouldn't be performing a high number of verifications. That is a sign that you are sending unwanted emails. Programs I sign up for I approve as they come into the spamarrest system, and they never have an issue.

                      The only one that would have an issue would be someone trying to spam an email list with a new program, or otherwise make contact with people on a bulk basis that they haven't had contact with before.
                      a very simple and basic example is any mailing list, do not make the mistake of associating all mailings as unwanted. i get emailed weekly newsletters from 2 associations and practice times from my softball league

                      who is spammarest to say that i should not get emails from people that choose not to pay spammarrest for the privilage of sending them to me?

                      why are they making any decisions on whether i get my mail or not other than the image verification?
                      Webmasterchecks Affiliate Payments - fully compatible with nats/mpa3

                      Comment

                      • RawAlex
                        So Fucking Banned
                        • Oct 2003
                        • 9465

                        #12
                        Just authorize them and don't worry about it.

                        They are trying to stop people who spam endlessly. Sending many emails in a row to protected accounts that aren't authorized is just a bad idea - basically, if people double opt in, you would already been authorized (they would have authorized you at the time of signup, so you would have been good to go) but apparently you weren't.

                        if you don't like the service, quit - or quit sending spam.

                        As a side note, it also stops certain types of reflected spam / DoS attacks.

                        Comment

                        Working...