Sick Fuckers... who takes their children to nude beaches ?

LOL i just remembered, any chance your ICQ friends are also DH's spyware friends ? I remember them, don't worry they ignored me 4 months ago. I remember now, it was funny, DH was making post after post passing on the information his spyware buddies were telling him on icq to post on GFY.

Fuck tell them all to ignore me, everyone here can ignore me if they like. I am not here to impress anyone or make friends. If i really piss some people off i will just buy them drinks at the next show.

So you still think AFF and Sex Search had nothing to do with zango or did anything wrong ? Nevermind don't answer that, best you take your own advice and ignore me too.

Still waiting StuartD .......

why is this 8 pages?

i think this is romantic

I would further refine that and say that there is no need for a stranger to be able to "view" naked children, unless they were both in a safe and sanctioned environment such as a nudist resort. Parents and immediate family are the exception outside of this environment.

That's not to say that you can't let your 4 year old daughter run around topless or naked at the beach if you're comfortable as a parent with that, but a third party taking and publishing photos is another, completely fucked up, matter entirely. I bet many of those people, or their parents, would be absolutely livid if they knew they were on a paysite.

I am a thread killer

Not your fault man, if anyone killed it, it was me. It was 2 topics to start with when it should have been 1 from the start. It also got side tracked way too many times, and in the end StaurtD was exposed for way he feels towards me, which explained why he always replies in opposition to everything i post. That pretty much killed the thread as it had ran it's course for the most part anyway.


hope that makes you feel better

heres a bump o save the nudey thread

You are an idiot, you are bumping a thread that you posted pictures of nude children in. and then you call it a " nudey thread ".

Enough of this bickering already -
this site is a porn site, nomatter what content is posted here. There are plenty of images of porn all over the site to warrent the 'porn' tag, let alone the fact that it is a meeting place for porn webmasters.

The only problem I had with this whole shebang has been dealt with

idiot...

I don't agree with the site nor the content, but I would like to know how You come across this site? and what the hell were you searching for at the time? I have nothing against nudists, but I do have a problem with people with cameras taking pics of naked kids and building sites with them

There are a number of studies (mostly done in the 60s and 70s) that looked at children raised in nudist communities over time, and examined their social adjustment, deviance, sexual behaviors, etc.

The findings were that children raised around nudists were generally better adjusted than their raised-in-clothed-environment cohorts. They also typically had healthier attitudes about sex, typically had sex *later* (meaning later teen years) than their clothed cohorts, and in every way were well adjusted socially.

Generally, nudist environments are safe, nonsexual places and people who behave otherwise, act voyeuristic, or are sexual in their behavior are removed. At one clothing-optional hot springs I go to fairly often, the policy is very clear, and people learn quickly that anyone who hits on someone else or makes unwanted advances or touches in an inappropriate way is warned once and then ejected.

As someone who used to teach therapeutic massage, one of the earliest processes in teaching massage is helping people to separate nudity from sex and touch from sex... we in the adult industry tend to lump it all together, but once you are clear in your own mind, then being at a nude beach with people from 8 to 80 is totally not a big deal.

Now... a website glorifying pics of people at a nude beach is NOT at all the same thing, and is essentially an adult site that is taking the innocent activities of well adjusted people and presenting them in a sexual way. That is absolutely wrong. But it's important to differentiate between the two.

The site was listed on freehostedgalleries.com The affiliate program name is Innocent TV, http://www.innocent.tv/webmasters/ . It looks like it hasn't been updated on FHG's site since 02 which at that time they indicated that ccbill was doing their processing.

I am signing up to a lot of affiliate companies for a project I am working on this happened to be one of the ones on their list. Thankfully I looked around the site before signing up, I would never send traffic to a site like that.

Ok, after a couple of clicks I found something totally fucked up on that site... a page which gives EXAMPLES of ch*ld p*rn. Thankfully, the images themselves are 404.

I'm not going to copy the text here, or link to it. I'm sure GFY doesn't need this crap indexed.



110% fucked up.

I almost wish he did have the pics so it could be reported.

I guess no one cares

Its been reported but will someone do something about it....


probably not the govt is too busy protecting kids by doing 2257 investigations and don't have time to worry about sites like this

Do you mean the site was reported, or that specific page? If the pics were there then there would be no ifs, no buts, it is pure CP. Even the text on the page admits it.

I wonder if his lawyers advised him to create that page.

The site, i wasn't familar with that page.