Quote:
Originally Posted by onwebcam
You mean the falsified scientific material which was the very foundation of all others in support of the fraud? Get with the program.. Why don't you read and assess what the people behind it said themselves YEARS ago. That they were going to create a FALSE environmental problem to sell the World on a global tax and form a World Government. It's not a conspiracy theory.. It's FACT. You were conned. Get over it..
|
No, you were conned, but are unable and profoundly unlikely to realize it.
Read the science itself, not the political commentary funded by the oil and carbon corporations.
But, I know you never will. Science intimidates you, as well it should.
Science, unlike politics, never provides absolute answers, and recognizes that climate is a complex system which we cannot model without errors, and our models can't be used for micro-predictions like wether or not we might have a cool wet may after a warmer than average april.
So saying that a cool may, or a snowy winter, disproves the global warming model is only something a dimwit might do, and a dimwit can say anything, and many do.
I understand that it's pointless to attempt to argue science with anti-science, pro-corporate politicals. Still, if you did read the science, you might at least be able to avoid saying stupid things like a cool may disproves the theories. You could spout less patently dimwitted political commentary from the corporations you are defending.
Not that it matters - we humans will not stop burning the fossil carbon until it is all gone, and nothing can stop that.