GFY Improvement Suggestion: rate this post

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • borked
    Totally Borked
    • Feb 2005
    • 6284
    #1

    GFY Improvement Suggestion: rate this post

    I know I suggested this in some old thread by Eric and was "taken on board", but really, can we just have a "rate this post" system, so I can automatically ignore people with an average rating of minus-something rating?

    Works both ways cos then I don't waste people's time who are not seeing my posts cos I have a "useless poster" rating, but hey.....

    Allez, Eric, whatcha think? Would make your job a helluva lot easier to be able to see at-a-glance the most worthless posters on the board?

    1 vote per person per day per nic seems reasonable to prevent abuse of the system?

    For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com
    (consider figuring out the email as test #1)


    All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202
    Tags: None
    • ottopottomouse
      She is ugly, bad luck.
      • Jan 2010
      • 13177
      #2
      Won't people just have an argument about something and then vote each other down rather than it being about post quality?
      ↑ see post ↑
      13101

        Comment

        • mikeyddddd
          Viva la vulva!
          • Mar 2003
          • 16557
          #3
          Originally posted by borked
          GFY Improvement Suggestion: rate this post


            Comment

            • candyflip
              Carpe Visio
              • Jul 2002
              • 43069
              #4
              Too easy to abuse that. People might vote up if the like something. People will definitely vote down just because they don't like someone.

              Spend you some brain.
              Email Me

                Comment

                • seeandsee
                  Check SIG!
                  • Mar 2006
                  • 50945
                  #5
                  some members will abuse that to hide some people posts that way
                  BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year

                  Contact here

                    Comment

                    • borked
                      Totally Borked
                      • Feb 2005
                      • 6284
                      #6
                      Originally posted by borked
                      1 vote per person per day per nic seems reasonable to prevent abuse of the system?
                      like I said - wouldn't this help?

                      And mikeyyyy, stop with yer gifs, cos your turnaround to produce them is sick. And it humours me a lot

                      For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com
                      (consider figuring out the email as test #1)


                      All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202

                        Comment

                        • Cyber Fucker
                          Hmm
                          • Sep 2005
                          • 12642
                          #7
                          interesting idea

                            Comment

                            • scarlettcontent
                              www.scarlettcontent.net
                              • Mar 2006
                              • 6031
                              #8
                              interesting but abusable


                              Scarlett Content - Adult Content Provider - High Quality Adult Stock Content for your Websites, Mobile Media and Print.

                              Over 3 Million Images (14,000 photo sets) over 5000 Videos - Many Niches, US-2257, Awesome Prices.
                              Over 40 years in the adult industry.

                              [email protected] Follow us on twitter.

                                Comment

                                • $5 submissions
                                  I help you SUCCEED
                                  • Nov 2003
                                  • 32189
                                  #9
                                  I like the interest it seeks to promote--quality posts. However, the definition of "quality" varies from person to person. Also, there's the very real possibility of "mob" mentalities and abuse.

                                    Comment

                                    • CaptainHowdy
                                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                                      • Dec 2004
                                      • 94044
                                      #10
                                      You guys seem to care too much about a message board, I'm lonely too.

                                        Comment

                                        • fatfoo
                                          ICQ:649699063
                                          • Mar 2003
                                          • 27763
                                          #11
                                          I suggest not to ignore people. What if someone says something useful rarely?
                                          Send me an email: [email protected]

                                            Comment

                                            • CunningStunt
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Aug 2006
                                              • 5594
                                              #12
                                              If a user has been put on more than 50 people's ignore list, ban them. A reason has to be stated why they were placed on ignore in the first place together with proof to stop abuse.

                                              Sig whores are disallowed having sigs. See how much they post then.

                                              As a board owner, I hate the thought of having to implement any of the systems suggested by anyone including myself, and know that there's a 99% likelihood that nothing at all will change here.

                                                Comment

                                                • J. Falcon
                                                  www.AdultCopywriters.com
                                                  • May 2006
                                                  • 31587
                                                  #13
                                                  Originally posted by fatfoo
                                                  I suggest not to ignore people. What if someone says something useful rarely?
                                                  Or in your case, once in a blue moon.
                                                  Adult Copywriters



                                                  SEO Content for Porn Sites
                                                  sales at adultcopywriters dot com

                                                    Comment

                                                    • PenisFace
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Oct 2003
                                                      • 3774
                                                      #14
                                                      Post rating systems work amazingly well on another board I post on. Basically, if a thread is retarded, and people rate it as such, it gets shitcanned. Well, not really, but it gets moved to another subforum where the worst threads go. Basically, all the threads in that forum are terrible and no one should be subjected to them.

                                                      If a thread is rated as a five (the highest possible) by enough people, mods have the power to move it to the sub forum which is opposite of the shitty one, the place where all the best threads go to spend their elder years.

                                                      Basically, if you want to laugh your balls off and waste an entire day, read the best threads in the "best threads" sub forum.

                                                      If you want to become enraged and murder a kitten/puppy/schoolbus full of cute kindergarteners, read the shitty sub forum.

                                                      The same system should work here, the downside is that 99.9% of all the threads would get shitcanned into the shitty sub forum. Because 99.9% of the threads here are stupid and have nothing to do with anything.
                                                      Need custom blog posts or articles? Hit me up: Blog And Article Writer

                                                      Yes, I can do any kind of custom orders, too!

                                                      ICQ: 641204000

                                                        Comment

                                                        • DateDoc
                                                          Outside looking in.
                                                          • Feb 2005
                                                          • 14243
                                                          #15
                                                          It could work. You would need to weight votes based on a person's voting tendencies. That way you will get some semblance of balance and cut out the abuse of the rating system.

                                                          Basically, if someone alway votes a thread 1/5 and the average of the threads he has voted on by the members as a whole is a 3.5 his vote would be weighted higher by +2.5. His rating of 1 would be bumped to a 3.5.

                                                            Comment

                                                            • LickMyBalls
                                                              So Fucking Banned
                                                              • Oct 2009
                                                              • 756
                                                              #16
                                                              More Megan Fox

                                                                Comment

                                                                • Jakez
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • Jan 2004
                                                                  • 5656
                                                                  #17
                                                                  Getting rid of, or at least decreasing the amount of useless posters is very very simple. We could spend a day or even an hour tackling this problem and come up with a million perfect solutions. Obviously those in charge here do not give a damn. The end.
                                                                  Last edited by Jakez; 05-30-2010, 09:05 PM.
                                                                  [email protected] - jakezdumb - 573689400

                                                                  Killuminati

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • ottopottomouse
                                                                      She is ugly, bad luck.
                                                                      • Jan 2010
                                                                      • 13177
                                                                      #18
                                                                      Originally posted by PenisFace
                                                                      Post rating systems work amazingly well on another board I post on. Basically, if a thread is retarded, and people rate it as such, it gets shitcanned. Well, not really, but it gets moved to another subforum where the worst threads go. Basically, all the threads in that forum are terrible and no one should be subjected to them.
                                                                      sickipedia auto deletes jokes that get enough bad votes.

                                                                      Trouble with doing that to threads is you would get people crying that they keep losing their precious post-count because they posted in a retarded thread that got deleted

                                                                      I've seen a couple of other discussion forums work better by just not displaying Posts: on the page. People tend to then only post to add to the topic rather than up their number. Wouldn't work here though with people wanting sig views.
                                                                      ↑ see post ↑
                                                                      13101

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        Previous template Next
                                                                        Working...