Quote:
Originally Posted by Sagi_AFF
You have a right to meet lethal force with lethal force. The robber needs to take that into account when he points a weapon at someone.
If a robber points a gun at a police officer what do you think happens? Why should it be any different when he points it at a store owner?
|
You didn't answer my question. I wasn't debating the idea of lethal force meeting lethal force. In fact, I was streamlining it.
But you didn't answer my question. How is a wild west style shootout any better for the "innocent bystanders" than the possibility of being fatally impaled?
If you want to be able to legally kill, and that IS what this is about, then do it in the most economical foolproof way possible. Not some half baked dream of being Dirty Harry. There are much more effective ways of killing people.