Teh gays want breeders to start breeding.

**madawgz** · 02-13-2007, 09:18 PM

yeah i heard that on the colbert report i think

**Semi-Retired-Dave** · 02-13-2007, 09:19 PM

That's crazy!

**C_U_Next_Tuesday** · 02-13-2007, 09:34 PM

Its as ridiculous as not allowing same sex marriages. It will never fly.

**baddog** · 02-13-2007, 09:37 PM

Originally posted by C_U_Next_Tuesday

Its as ridiculous as not allowing same sex marriages. It will never fly.

Not even in the same ballpark.

**uno** · 02-13-2007, 10:08 PM

Originally posted by baddog

Not even in the same ballpark.

Sure it is. Of course it'll never pass.

**96ukssob** · 02-13-2007, 10:10 PM

Originally posted by baddog

So get it on folks.

OLYMPIA, Wash. - An initiative filed by proponents of same-sex marriage would require heterosexual couples to have kids within three years or else have their marriage annulled.

that is the stupist fucking thing i have ever heard in my life.

**baddog** · 02-13-2007, 10:11 PM

Originally posted by uno

Sure it is.

How so? Not even close.

**Semi-Retired-Dave** · 02-13-2007, 10:20 PM

Originally posted by baddog

How so? Not even close.

Send me your email, I sent you one to your avs email.

**Jace** · 02-13-2007, 10:24 PM

hahahahahahahah

omfg

um

last time I checked I got married because I loved my wife, not because we need to have kids

i gotta admit, that is some funny shit though

**96ukssob** · 02-13-2007, 10:34 PM

Originally posted by bossku69

that is the stupist fucking thing i have ever heard in my life.

i can not spell... ment to say

that is the stupidist fucking thing i have ever heard in my life.

**baddog** · 02-13-2007, 11:04 PM

Originally posted by bossku69

i can not spell... ment to say

that is the stupidist fucking thing i have ever heard in my life.

good catch

**baddog** · 02-13-2007, 11:07 PM

Originally posted by CyberAge-Dave

Send me your email, I sent you one to your avs email.

I responded to the one you sent to host address . . . missed the other I guess

**baddog** · 02-14-2007, 02:10 PM

Boy Alley? Any commentary?

**BoyAlley** · 02-14-2007, 02:14 PM

Originally posted by baddog

Boy Alley? Any commentary?

Sure.

The law has no chance of passing, and those that are pushing that know it (nor do they want it to pass).

The argument that the religious right uses time and time again about why there should be a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marrage is that the ideal environment to raise a child is a one man one woman household.

In fact, children and "protecting families" are pretty much the ONLY excuse that the religious right has been able to come up with for why gay marriage is bad.

So, using THEIR own logic, and THEIR own arguments, this law was proposed.

If marriage is only about having kids, then everyone that gets married should have kids.

Of course, we all know that marriage is about much more than that (and for many couples it's not about kids at all). Marriage is about love, commitment, and be able to protect and provide for your spouse, and having a legal support structure that allows for that.

This law was proposed to make that point.

**gimo33** · 02-14-2007, 02:14 PM

lol... funny shit... BA's on a roll today.. gonna wait for his/her comment.

*edit* already have his/her comment above...

JD · 02-14-2007, 02:21 PM

haha fucking heeeeeeeeeee-larry-us

D · 02-14-2007, 02:58 PM

That's frikkin awesome.

Maybe a few of the more enlightened peeps that stand against gay marriage will flip their position after thinking for awhile on this one.

**96ukssob** · 02-14-2007, 03:01 PM

Originally posted by baddog

good catch

need to have a built in spell check here

**CuriousToyBoy** · 02-14-2007, 04:26 PM

Alas John Paul, my pre-Christmas vasectomy precludes any further influence I may have on altering the genetic profiles of our society.

He he

;-)

**Phil** · 02-14-2007, 04:48 PM

Originally posted by BoyAlley

Sure.

The law has no chance of passing, and those that are pushing that know it (nor do they want it to pass).

The argument that the religious right uses time and time again about why there should be a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marrage is that the ideal environment to raise a child is a one man one woman household.

In fact, children and "protecting families" are pretty much the ONLY excuse that the religious right has been able to come up with for why gay marriage is bad.

So, using THEIR own logic, and THEIR own arguments, this law was proposed.

If marriage is only about having kids, then everyone that gets married should have kids.

Of course, we all know that marriage is about much more than that (and for many couples it's not about kids at all). Marriage is about love, commitment, and be able to protect and provide for your spouse, and having a legal support structure that allows for that.

This law was proposed to make that point.

A lot of people chose not to have kids because they can’t, can’t afford it or they have other priorities. I don’t care what religious freaks say but reproduction is one of the key parts in what heteros MARRIGE.. Gays can’t have it regardless..
BoyAlley, please tell me why do you guys want this “marriage” thing so badly. Pick a word other than “marriage” and here we go.. problem solved. You did give word “gay” different meaning from what it was back in 1900’s. Grape is a grape.. when you dry it it become raisin. Are you following me?

**Jman** · 02-14-2007, 04:51 PM

Soon on gfy... "The Battle of Teh Whores!"

Teh gays want breeders to start breeding.

Teh gays want breeders to start breeding.

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment