Anybody use the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Validus
    Confirmed User
    • Jul 2001
    • 4012

    #1

    Anybody use the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM?

    I am thinking about getting the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM for my Canon 20D, looks like one sweet lens. Had it for a weekend and really liked it. Any thoughts on the lens?
  • tony299
    lurker
    • Aug 2002
    • 57021

    #2
    to me alittle too expensive for something thats L glass.

    Comment

    • Validus
      Confirmed User
      • Jul 2001
      • 4012

      #3
      Originally posted by tony404
      to me alittle too expensive for something thats L glass.
      I sure like that lens though Really sharp and great with low light...

      Comment

      • Validus
        Confirmed User
        • Jul 2001
        • 4012

        #4
        any more comments? feedback?

        Comment

        • Star 69
          Confirmed User
          • Nov 2005
          • 8602

          #5
          Get better Canon EF 24-70mm f/2,8 L USM, the same price but it's quality of L lense.
          e-mail star69

          Comment

          • rowan
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Mar 2002
            • 17393

            #6
            Originally posted by Star 69
            Get better Canon EF 24-70mm f/2,8 L USM, the same price but it's quality of L lense.
            That lens lacks IS (which may or may not matter?), but on a 20D 24mm isn't really wide angle...

            I'd do the speil about not buying overpriced EF-S lenses because they're incompatible with other bodies, but I can't really think of an EF lens with a similar range

            Comment

            • Validus
              Confirmed User
              • Jul 2001
              • 4012

              #7
              Hm, I don't hear many people that are excited about this lens

              Comment

              • rowan
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Mar 2002
                • 17393

                #8
                If 24mm is wide enough for you then have a look at the EF 24-105mm f4L IS USM. It's a stop slower in wide open aperture but you'll gain an extra 2 or 3 stops from the IS. (If you are shooting something fast moving like sports then f4 may still be too slow; IS just stops camera shake, it doesn't freeze the action.)

                The 24-105mm is showing the same RRP as the 17-55mm lens on the Canon AU site.

                Comment

                • xenilk
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jan 2006
                  • 921

                  #9
                  It's a pretty good lense IMHO. I own the 50mm EF 1.8 (really cheap and worth it for portraits) and that one you talked about. Great for shooting.
                  40$/Page PSD->XHTML/CSS Transformations

                  Comment

                  • Evil E
                    Confirmed User
                    • Apr 2005
                    • 3201

                    #10
                    I wish, I don't have that kind of money right now. I also have the 50mm EF 1.8 and it's great for the price.


                    A girl once told me "Give me 8 inches and make it HURT".

                    So, I fucked her twice and hit her with a brick.

                    Comment

                    Working...