I say NO
-
-
NO! I dont want it -
YES. You sick people do not wish to protect innocent children from porn? Shame on all of you.
Ivanov - The Original Russian Board GuyComment
-
Ivanoff, are you totally mad, dude? What innocent children are talking about?
Looks like some pathetic BSI produce porn since 1999. Amateur hot teens.Teen gays, niches, etc...
Meet Harry. RED HARRY Adult Content Provider since 1999Comment
-
No - .XXX will not protect kids, will show exactly where to find porn
contact jambojack at gmailComment
-
It is very American thing to simplify everything.
.xxx tells these dullards that here is porn.
Next will be .gay, .anal, and .tits, Just so these sad, mindless people can be quite clear when visiting a site such as www,gayanaltitfuckingbitchesporn.tld Ivanov - The Original Russian Board GuyComment
-
No...............................Comment
-
no to .xxx
yes to .kidsComment
-
NO. Yes to educating parents and filtering.Comment
-
Exactly, .kids would allow parents to let their children view content that is for kids only.
.xxx would NOT help to keep kids away from porn, filtering or not, there are much worse things around than just porn, e.g. violence, death, racism, and so on.
Positive filtering works much better than blacklists, partner submissions accounts for TGPs are a good example from our industry: Almost everybody uses them, because blacklisting is useless.Comment
-
We don't need itComment
-
Under any and all circumstances... NOComment
-
ICANN's Board previously found the proposed .XXX agreement to be so deficient
in merit that is was rejected by a nearly 2-1 vote. In our view the proposed
"cure" of the RPA under consideration is substantially worse than the original
proposal and deserves unanimous rejection. It would implicate ICANN in areas
far outside its technical mandate and would set s series of terrible precedents
that would disfigure the fundamental purpose of the DNS.
For all of the reasons stated in this letter, the ICA strongly opposes adoption
of the Revised Proposed Agreement for .XXX and urges the Board to promptly
reject it and to do so with finality.
The ICA appreciates your consideration of our comments in this matter.
Sincerely,
Philip S. Corwin
Partner, Butera & Andrews; Washington, DC
Counsel, Internet Commerce Association
A girl once told me "Give me 8 inches and make it HURT".
So, I fucked her twice and hit her with a brick.Comment
-
Comment
-
of course I don't want kids getting hold of porn...but I don't think .xxx will be the best way to do that!
Comment
-
NO to .xxxComment
-
-
hell NO!Comment
-
Nope. I won't be buying any .xxx domains.
Fling.com doesn't steal your traffic and sales unlike some other dating companies. I promote them, and so should you!
Comment
-
What day is ICANN going to make the decision (again) ?Comment
-
NO at 99.9%Help me Help youComment
-
No.
Segregation has proven, time and time again, to be the wrong way to go about things.-D.
ICQ: 202-96-31Comment
-
No.
Segregation has proven, time and time again, to be the wrong way to go about things.-D.
ICQ: 202-96-31Comment
-
I say ISP's should be forced to do Cable Television has done.. Provide the filters for the parents since the parents can't filter the kids.
A simple login screen to the Internet (or inactive time) would do the trick. Each parent/kid has a unique login, the parent can set the controls at the ISP level of how strong they want the filters - just like cable companies provide for us now.
~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguation
Comment
-
Not NO, but hell no.Comment
-
no 8charComment
Comment