Remember, it isn't the aids that kills ya, it's the common cold... But I can see his story working, at least until they inquire about a permit to shoot vid at that location... (Some places require it, some don't)
Try this. Get a HIV test, set up a camera in the bedroom, book a model and tell her it's voyeur content and she's to bang you like there's no tomorrow.
Better fuck, no time limit, no "I don't do that.", better attitude, younger, you can get to see a picture of the girl before she turns up and probably cheaper than a hooker.
Try this. Get a HIV test, set up a camera in the bedroom, book a model and tell her it's voyeur content and she's to bang you like there's no tomorrow.
Better fuck, no time limit, no "I don't do that.", better attitude, younger, you can get to see a picture of the girl before she turns up and probably cheaper than a hooker.
I know it works. LOL
And the best part, you will have the content to remember.
Seriously though, I was just thinking about this the other day. And no I haven't tried it!
If you had a camera and release on you, how could they dispute otherwise? If you and her got caught, just say she was modeling for you. Wonder if anyone has actually tried it and got out of getting busted
Try this. Get a HIV test, set up a camera in the bedroom, book a model and tell her it's voyeur content and she's to bang you like there's no tomorrow.
Better fuck, no time limit, no "I don't do that.", better attitude, younger, you can get to see a picture of the girl before she turns up and probably cheaper than a hooker.
the problem is that you won't get busted banging a prostitute. You'll get busted proposing a "business" to a prostitute who is in all reality a cop. Otherwise, once you're doing her in the room, nobody can prove that yo paid her or not.
the problem is that you won't get busted banging a prostitute. You'll get busted proposing a "business" to a prostitute who is in all reality a cop. Otherwise, once you're doing her in the room, nobody can prove that yo paid her or not.
the problem is that you won't get busted banging a prostitute. You'll get busted proposing a "business" to a prostitute who is in all reality a cop. Otherwise, once you're doing her in the room, nobody can prove that yo paid her or not.
Yes indeed which i why is probably nonsense when i see in tv series how is someone busted because of using prostitute.
Try this. Get a HIV test, set up a camera in the bedroom, book a model and tell her it's voyeur content and she's to bang you like there's no tomorrow.
Better fuck, no time limit, no "I don't do that.", better attitude, younger, you can get to see a picture of the girl before she turns up and probably cheaper than a hooker.
I know it works. LOL
I am taking notes
Looking for a KICK ASS TEEN SPONSOR? Check out ROYAL CASH - THE KING OF TEEN!
Incredible webmaster tools FHGs, Morphing Blog and RSS Feeds, Embedded FLV & WMV Videos. With TOP RATIO Sites like
If you had a camera and release on you, how could they dispute otherwise? If you and her got caught, just say she was modeling for you. Wonder if anyone has actually tried it and got out of getting busted
Here's the difference between porn and prostitution...
What makes porn legal to shoot in California and New Hampshire is the fact that porn involves a producer/director paying other people to have sex. The person paying is not receiving the direct sexual gratification from the model.
In Freeman, the California Supreme Court noted the lack of sexual gratification for the producer as the the deciding factor for the court finding porn production a protected First Amendment right. Even under Freeman, POV shoots in California are not protected if the director that is paying is also the male talent.
I regularly receive calls from newbies that say they have the next big thing in porn -- regular guys that will pay the costs of the production to fuck pornstars on camera.... sorry thats still prostitution.
Here's the difference between porn and prostitution...
What makes porn legal to shoot in California and New Hampshire is the fact that porn involves a producer/director paying other people to have sex. The person paying is not receiving the direct sexual gratification from the model.
In Freeman, the California Supreme Court noted the lack of sexual gratification for the producer as the the deciding factor for the court finding porn production a protected First Amendment right. Even under Freeman, POV shoots in California are not protected if the director that is paying is also the male talent.
I regularly receive calls from newbies that say they have the next big thing in porn -- regular guys that will pay the costs of the production to fuck pornstars on camera.... sorry thats still prostitution.
So you hire 2 hookers. One to be your producer , one to be your talent. Some kind of lawyer you are. You're supposed to advise us how to circumvent the law.
So you hire 2 hookers. One to be your producer , one to be your talent. Some kind of lawyer you are. You're supposed to advise us how to circumvent the law.
LOL... its easier if you get 2 producers together and hire each other as male talent and swap the content as well....
Comment